Usefulness of the Trendelenburg test for identification of patients with hip joint osteoarthritis

REFERENCES

• Altman R, Alarcón G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Brown C, Cooke TD, Daniel W, Feldman D, et al 1991 The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis & Rheumatism 34:505–514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews AW, Thomas MW, Bohannon RW 1996 Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with handheld dynamometers. Physical Therapy 76:248–259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arokoski MH, Arokoski JP, Haara M, Kankaanpää, Vesterinen M, Niemitukia LH, Helminen HJ 2002 Hip muscle strength and muscle cross sectional area in men with and without hip osteoarthritis. Journal of Rheumatology 29:2185–2195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arokoski MH, Haara M, Helminen HJ, Aroskoski JP 2004 Physical function in men with and without osteoarthritis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 85:574–581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asayama I, Naito M, Fujisawa M, Kambe T 2002 Relationship between radiographic measurements of reconstructed hip joint position and the Trendelenburg sign. Journal of Arthroplasty 17:747–751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker AS, Bitounis VC 1989 Abductor function after total hip replacement. An elecreomyographic and clinical review. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery [American] 71:47–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber TC, Roger DJ, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ 1996 Early outcome of total hip arthroplasty using the direct lateral versus the posterior surgical approach. Orthopedics 19:873–875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW 1997 Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 78:26–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson M 2002 The interpretation of diagnostic tests: A primer for physiotherapists. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 48:227–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denegar CR, Ball DW 1993 Assessing reliability and precision of measurement: An introduction to intraclass correlation and standard error of measurement. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 2:35–42
   Google Scholar
• Downing ND, Clark DI, Hutchinson JW, Colclough K, Howard PW 2001 Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty. A prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavia 72:215–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dujardin B, Van den Ends J, Van Gompel A, Unger JP, Van der Stuyft P 1994 Likelihood ratios: A real improvement for clinical decision making?. Europaean Journal of Physiotherapy 10:29–36
   Google Scholar
• Hardcastle P, Nade S 1985 The significance of the Trendelenburg test. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery [British] 67:741–746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert R, Jamtvedt G, Mead J, Berger Hagen K 2005 Practical Evidence-Based Physiotherapy. Philadelphia, Elsevier Butter-worth Heinemann
   Google Scholar
• Hoaglund FT, Steinbach LS 2001 Primary osteoarthritis of the hip: Etiology and epidemiology. Journal of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery 29:320–327
   Google Scholar
• Inan M, Alkan A, Harma A, Ertem K 2005 Evaluation of the gluteus medius muscle after a pelvic support osteotomy to treat congenital dislocation of the hip. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery [American] 87:2246–2252
   Google Scholar
• Johnston RC, Smidt GL 1970 Hip motion measurements for selected activities of daily living. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research 72:205–221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS 1957 Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Annals of Rheumatic Disease 16:494–502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee DJ 2006 Orthopedic Physical Assessment Enhanced Edition 4th ed. Philadelphia, Saunders
   Google Scholar
• Neumann DA 2002 Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System. Mosby, Foundations for Physical Rehabilitation, St. Louis
   Google Scholar
• Pai VS 1996 Significance of the Trendelenburg test in total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 11:174–179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh M, O'Byrne JM, McCarthy N, Jarvis A, Mahalingham K, Cashman WF 1996 Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after the Hardinge approach to the hip. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery [British] 78:903–906
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rasch A, Dalén N, Berg HE 2005 Test methods to detect hip and knee muscle weakness and gait disturbance in patients with osteoarthritis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86:2371–2376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reikeraas O, Lereim P, Gabor I, Gunderson R, Bjerkreim I 1996 Femoral shortening in total hip arthroplasty for completely dislocated hips. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavia 67:33–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt JS, Difabio RP 2004 Reliable change and minimum important difference (MIP) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57:1008–1018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL 1979 Intraclass correlations; uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 86:420–428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford PN, Binkley JM, Riddle DL, Guyatt GH 1998 Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire. Part 1. Physical Therapy 78:1186–1196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JG, Young NL 1997 The patient-specific index: asking patients what they want. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery [American] 79:974–983
   Google Scholar