Walking speed and distance in different environments of subjects in the later stage post-stroke

REFERENCES

• Aniansson A, Rundgren A, Sperling L 1980 Evaluation of functional capacity in activities of daily living in 70-year-old men and women. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 12: 145–154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ATS (American Thoracic Society) 2002 ATS statement: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 166: 111–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI, Holliday PJ, Wood-Dauphinee SL 1992 Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 73: 1073–1080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B 1992 Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument. Canadian Journal of Public Health 83(Suppl 2):S7–S11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman MG, Jonides J, Kaplan S 2008 The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science 19: 1207–1212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr J, Shepherd R 2003 Stroke rehabilitation: Guidelines for exercise and training to optimize motor skill. London, Butterworth-Heineman
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho C, Willen C, Sunnerhagen KS 2008 Relationship between walking function and 1-legged bicycling test in subjects in the later stage post-stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 40: 721–726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F 2001 Walking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 15: 415–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan K, Lord SE, McNaughton HK, Weatherall M 2008 Mobility beyond the clinic: The effect of environment on gait and its measurement in community-ambulant stroke survivors. Clinical Rehabilitation 22: 556–563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG 1983 Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Physical Therapy 63: 1606–1610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng JJ, Chu KS, Dawson AS, Kim CM, Hepburn KE 2002 Functional walk tests in individuals with stroke: Relation to perceived exertion and myocardial exertion. Stroke 33: 756–761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enright PL, Sherrill DL 1998 Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 158: 1384–1387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J 2005 Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 37: 75–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman PJ 1990 Gait recovery after hemiplegic stroke. International Disability Studies 12: 119–122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S 1975 The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 7: 13–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE 2002 The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 16: 232–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ, Fallen EL, Pugsley SO, Taylor DW, Berman LB 1985 The 6-minute walk: A new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Canadian Medical Association Journal 132: 919–923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harada ND, Chiu V, Stewart AL 1999 Mobility-related function in older adults: Assessment with a 6-minute walk test. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 80: 837–841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill K, Ellis P, Bernhardt J, Maggs P, Hull S 1997 Balance and mobility outcomes for stroke patients: A comprehensive audit. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 43: 173–180
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lord SE, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, Rochester L, Weatherall M 2004 Community ambulation after stroke: How important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 85: 234–239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord SE, Rochester L, Weatherall M, McPherson KM, McNaughton HK 2006 The effect of environment and task on gait parameters after stroke: A randomized comparison of measurement conditions. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 87: 967–973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren-Lindquist B, Aniansson A, Rundgren A 1983 Functional studies in 79-year-olds. III. Walking performance and climbing capacity. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 15: 125–131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mao HF, Hsueh IP, Tang PF, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL 2002 Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke 33: 1022–1027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patla A, Shumway-Cook A 1999 Dimensions of mobility: Defining the complexity and difficulty associated with community mobility. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity 7: 7–19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ 1995 Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 26: 982–989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl P, Duncan P, Perera S, Liu W, Siu M, Studenski S, Long J 2002 Influence of stroke-related impairments on performance in 6-minute walk test. Journal of Rehabilation Research and Development 39: 439–445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riks-stroke 2006 Analyserande rapport från Riks-Stroke för helåret 2006 (in Swedish), The National Stroke Register in Sweden; 2006, http://www.riks-stroke.org (accessed 15 August 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Patla AE, Stewart A, Ferrucci L, Ciol MA, Guralnik JM 2002 Environmental demands associated with community mobility in older adults with and without mobility disabilities. Physical Therapy 82: 670–681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunnerhagen KS, Hedberg M, Henning GB, Cider A, Svantesson U 2000 Muscle performance in an urban population sample of 40- to 79-year-old men and women. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 32: 159–167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor D, Stretton CM, Mudge S, Garrett N 2006 Does clinic-measured gait speed differ from gait speed measured in the community in people with stroke? Clinical Rehabilitation 20: 438–444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Port IG, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E 2008 Community ambulation in patients with chronic stroke: How is it related to gait speed? Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 40: 23–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyck D, Deforche B, Cardon GDe, Bourdeaudhuij I 2009 Neighbourhood walkability and its particular importance for adults with a preference for passive transport. Health Place 15: 496–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Wood VA, Heller A, Maggs J, Langton Hewer R 1987 Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 19: 25–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Witte US, Carlsson JY 1997 Self-selected walking speed in patients with hemiparesis after stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 29: 161–165
   PubMedGoogle Scholar