Pragmatism in practice: Mixed methods research for physiotherapy

REFERENCES

• American Physical Therapy Association 2001 Guide to Physical Therapist Practice 2nd Edition. Physical Therapy 81: 9–746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett D, Macnab J, MacArthur C, Mandich A, Magill-Evans J, Young N, Beal D, Conti-Becker A, Polatajko H 2006 Advancing rehabilitation research: An interactionist perspective to guide question and design. Disability and Rehabilitation 28: 1169–1176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bithell C 2000 Evidence-based physiotherapy: Some thoughts on best evidence. Physiotherapy 80: 58–60
   Google Scholar
• Bryman A 2007 Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 8–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell R, Quilty B, Dieppe P 2003 Discrepancies between patients' assessments of outcome: Qualitative study nested within a randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal 326: 252–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Physiotherapy Association 2006 Position statement: Evidence-based and best practice in physiotherapy. Toronto, Canadian Physical Therapy Association
   Google Scholar
• Caracelli V, Greene J 1993 Data analysis strategies for mixed-methods evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15: 195–207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherryholmes C 1992 Notes on pragmatism and scientific realism. Educational Researcher 21: 13–17
   Google Scholar
• Creswell J, Plano Clark V 2007 Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
   Google Scholar
• Crotty M 2005 Foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sydney, Sage
   Google Scholar
• Dean E 2008 Evidence-based practice within the context of evidence-informed practice. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 25: 354–368
   Google Scholar
• Eakin J, Mykhalovskiy E 2003 Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: Reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9: 187–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards I, Richardson B 2008 Clinical reasoning and population health: Decision making for an emerging paradigm of health care. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 24: 183–193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson B, Martin D 2003 Qualitative research and evidence based physiotherapy practice. Physiotherapy 89: 350–358
   Google Scholar
• Giddings L, Grant B 2007 A Trojan Horse for positivism? A critique of mixed methods research. Advances in Nursing Research 30: 52–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene J 2008 Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2: 7–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba E, Lincoln Y 2004 Competing paradigms in qualitative research: Theories and issues. In: Hesse-Biber S, Leavy P (eds) Approaches to qualitative research: A reader on theory and practice, pp 17–38. New York, Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Herbert R, Higgs J 2004 Complementary research paradigms. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 50: 63–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herbert R, Sherrington C, Maher C, Moseley A 2001 Evidence-based practice: Imperfect but necessary. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 17: 201–211
   Google Scholar
• Higgs J, Titchen A 1995 The nature, generation, and verification of knowledge. Physiotherapy 81: 521–530
   Google Scholar
• Higgs J, Titchen A 1998 Research and knowledge. Physiotherapy 84: 72–80
   Google Scholar
• Holloway I, Todres L 2003 The status of method: Flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research 3: 345–357
   Google Scholar
• Huber J 1986 Symbolic interaction as a pragmatic perspective: The bias of emergent theory. American Sociological Review 38: 274–284
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson J 2004 Health, health education, and physiotherapy practice. In: French S, Sim J (eds) Physiotherapy: A psychosocial approach, 3rd edn., pp 25–43. London, Butterworth-Heinemann
   Google Scholar
• James W 1907/2007 Pragmatism. Sioux Falls, NuVision, p 35
   Google Scholar
• Jensen G, Gwyer J, Shepard K, Hack L 2000 Expert practice in physical therapy. Physical Therapy 80: 28–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone P 2004 Mixed methods, mixed methodology: Health services research in practice. Qualitative Health Research 14: 259–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen P 2000 Concepts of body and health in physiotherapy: The meaning of the social/cultural aspects of life. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 16: 105–115
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn T 1970 The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist I, Engardt M, Garnham L, Poland F, Richardson B 2006 Physiotherapy students' professional identity on the edge of working life. Medical Teacher 28: 270–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipscomb M 2008 Mixed method nursing studies: A critical realist critique. Nursing Philosophy 9: 32–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitland M 2004 A comparison of two approaches used to gather evidence to support clinical decision making: An editorial. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 20: 211–218
   Google Scholar
• Mead GH 1964 The philosophical basis of ethics. In: Reck A (ed), Selected writings, pp 82–94. New York, Bobbs-Merrill
   Google Scholar
• Medves J, Paterson M, Chapman C, Young J, Tata E, Bowes D, Hobbes N, McAndrews B, O'Riordan A 2008 A new interprofessional course preparing learners for life in rural communities. Rural and Remote Health 8: 1–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan D 1998 Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research 8: 362–376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan D 2007 Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 48–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow S 2005 Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology 52: 250–260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse J 1991 Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research 40: 120–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J 2007 Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: A mixed methods study. BMC Health Services Research 7: 85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Shea S, Taylor N, Paratz J 2007 Qualitative outcomes of progressive resistance exercise for people with COPD. Chronic Respiratory Disease 4: 135–142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parry A 1997 New paradigms for old: Musings on the shape of clouds. Physiotherapy 83: 423–433
   Google Scholar
• Pincus T, Vogel S, Breen A, Foster N, Underwood F 2006 Persistent back pain—Why do physical therapy clinicians continue treatment? A mixed methods study of chiropractors, osteopaths, and physiotherapists. European Journal of Pain 10: 67–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plack M 2005 Human nature and research paradigms: Theory meets physical therapy practice. The Qualitative Report 10: 223–245
   Google Scholar
• Rauscher L, Greenfield B 2009 Advancements in contemporary physical therapy research: Use of mixed methods designs. Physical Therapy 89: 91–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick L, Jensen G 2003 Using clinical outcomes to explore the theory of expert practice in physical therapy. Physical Therapy 83: 1090–1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskell C, Hewison A, Wildman S 1998 The theory-practice gap and physiotherapy in the UK: Insights from the nursing experience. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 14: 223–233
   Google Scholar
• Shepard K, Jensen G, Schmoll B, Hack L, Gwyer J, Mattingly C 1993 Alternative approaches to research in physical therapy: Positivism and phenomenology. Physical Therapy 73: 88–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinkels A, Albarran J, Means R, Mitchell T, Stewart M 2002 Evidence-based practice in health and social care: Where are we now? Journal of Interprofessional Care 16: 335–347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tashakkori A, Teddlie C 1998Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
   Google Scholar
• Thornquist E 2001 Diagnostic in physiotherapy—Processes, patterns, and perspectives. Part 2. Advances in Physiotherapy 3: 151–162
   Google Scholar
• Williams M 2007 Guest editorial—Evolution: A useful philosophy for physiotherapy research. Physiotherapy Research International 12: 197–200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Confederation of Physical Therapy 2002 Evidence based practice—An international perspective. London, World Confederation of Physical Therapy
   Google Scholar