How to assess postsurgical scars: A review of outcome measures

References

• Mustoe TA, Cooter RD, Gold MH, Hobbs FD, Ramelet AA, Shakespeare PG, Stella M, Téot L, Wood FM, Ziegler UE. International clinical recommendations on scar management. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:560–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayat A, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MWJ. Skin scarring. BMJ 2003;326:88–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roques C, Téot L. A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2007;6:249–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atiyeh BS. Nonsurgical management of hypertrophic scars: evidence-based therapies, standard practices, and emerging methods. Aesth Plast Surg 2007;31:468–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Téot L. Scar evaluation and management: recommendations. Eur Tissue Repair Soc Bull 2005;12:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Truong PT, Lee JC, Soer B, Gaul CA, Olivotto IA. Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:487–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers PS, Sarkar S, Goldgof DB, Cruse CW, Tsap LV. Scar assessment: current problems and future solutions. J Burn Care Rehabil 1999;20:54–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bock O, Schmid-Ott G, Malewski P, Mrowietz U. Quality of life of patients with keloid and hypertrophic scarring. Arch Dermatol Res 2006;297:433–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary C, Sanders AK, Nick TG. Reliability of the skin compliance device in the assessment of scar pliability. J Hand Ther 2007;20:232–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseborough IE, Grevious MA, Lee RC. Prevention and treatment of excessive dermal scarring. J Natl Med Assoc 2004;96:108–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McOwan CG, MacDermid JC, Wilton J. Outcome measures for evaluation of scar: a literature review. J Hand Ther 2001;14:77–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van de Kar AL, Corion LUM, Smeulders MJC, Draaijers LJ, van der Horst CM, van Zuijlen PP. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the patient and observer scar assessment scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116: 514–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zuijlen PPM, Angeles AP, Kreis RW, Bos KE, Middelkoop E. Scar assessment tools: implication for current research. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:1108–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du YC, Lin CM, Chen CL, Chen T. Implementation of a burn scar assessment system by ultrasound techniques. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006;1:2328–2331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crowe JM, Simpson K, Johnson W, Allen J. Reliability of photographic analysis in determining change in scar appearance. J Burn Care Rehabil 1998;19:183–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith GM, Tompkins DM, Bigelow E, Antoon AY. Burn-induced cosmetic disfigurement: can it be measured reliably? J Burn Care Rehabil 1988;9:371–375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cua AB, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI. Elastic properties of human skin: relation to age, sex, and anatomical region. Arch Dermatol Res 1990;282:283–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer AJ, Church AL, Forrestal K, Werblud M, ValentineSM, Hollander JE. Comparison of patient satisfaction and practitioner satisfaction with wound appearance after traumatic wound repair. Acad Emerg Med 1997;4:133–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Téot L. Clinical evaluation of scars. Wound Repair Regen 2002;10:93–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YAM, Kreis RW, Middelkoop E, van Zuijlen PP. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation. Burns 2004;30:103–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong PT, Abnousi F, Yong CM, Hayashi A, Runkel JA, Phillips T, Olivotto A. Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the Vancouver Scar Scale, Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and patients' perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116:1291–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Loey NE, Bremer M, Faber AW, Middelkoop E, Nieuwenhuis MK. Itching following burns: epidemiology and predictors. Br J Dermatol 2007;158:95–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan JA, Bond JS, Mason T, Ludlow A, Cridland P, O'Kane S, Ferguson MW. Visual analogue scale scoring and ranking: a suitable and sensitive method for assessing scar quality? Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:909–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen DQA, Potokar T, Price P. A review of current objective and subjective scar assessment tools. J Wound Care 2008;17:101–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan T, Smith J, Kermode J, Mclver E, Courtemanche DJ. Rating the burn scar. J Burn Care Rehabil 1990;11:256–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baryza MJ, Baryza GA. The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995;16:535–538.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nedelec B, Shankowsky HA, Tredget EE. Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: comparison of the Vancouver Scar Scale and scar volume. J Burn Care Rehabil 2000;21:205–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Draaijers JL, Tempelman FR, Botman YAM, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004. 113:1960–1965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beausang E, Floyd H, Dunn KW, Orton CI, Ferguson MW. A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1954–1961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeboom JA, Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet ES, Kuijper EJ, Polsbrook RM, Horsthuis RB, Prins JM, Lindeboom R. Interpretation and precision of the Observer Scar Assessment Scale improved by a revised scoring. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;9:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Singer AJ, Arora B, Dagum A, Valentine S, Hollander JE. Development and validation of a novel scar evaluation scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:1892–1897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kobesova A, Morris CE, Lewit K, Safarova M. Twenty-year-old pathogenic ‘active’ postsurgical scar: a case study of a patient with persistent right lower quadrant pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30:234–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor ME, Perez CA, Halverson KJ, Kuske RR, Philpott GW, Garcia DM, Mortimer JE, Myerson RJ, Radford D, Rush C. Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;31:753–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson MP, Pezner RD, Hill LR, Vora NL, Desai KR, Lipsett JA. Patient self-evaluation of cosmetic outcome of breast-preserving cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985;11:1849–1852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocchiarella L, Andersson GBJ. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 5th edChicago: American Medical Association; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ 1997. 314:572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar