Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain

References

• Bogduk N. The neck. Best Prac Res Clin Rheumatol 1999;13:261–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen I, Harms-Ringdahl K. Neck pain. Best Prac Res Clin Rheumatol 2007;21:93–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Nicholson LL, Adams RD. Cervical range of motion associations with subclinical neck pain. Spine 2004;29:33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans RL, Bouter LM. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Spine J 2004;4:335–356.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• David J, Modi S, Aluko AA, Robertshaw C, Farebrother J. Chronic neck pain: a comparison of acupuncture treatment and physiotherapy. Br J Rheumatol 1998;37:1118–1122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross AR, Goldsmith C, Hoving JL, Haines T, Peloso P, Aker P, Santaguida P, Myers C. Conservative management of mechanical neck disorders: a systematic review. J Rheumatol 2007;34:1083–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNair PJ, Portero P, Chiquet C, Mawston G, Lavaste F. Acute neck pain: cervical spine range of motion and position sense prior to and after joint mobilization. Man Ther 2007;12:390–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitland GD, Hengeveld E, Banks K, English K, editors. Maitland's vertebral manipulation. 7th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann; 2005. p499.
   Google Scholar
• Chiradejnant A, Maher CG, Latimer J, Stepkovitch N. Efficacy of ‘therapist-selected’ versus ‘randomly selected’ mobilisation techniques for the treatment of low back pain: a randomised controlled trial. Aus J Physiother 2003;49:233–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definition of pain terms. 2nd ed. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn NU, Ahn UM, Ipsen B, An HS. Mechanical neck pain and cervicogenic headache. Neurosurgery 2007;60:S21–S27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fejer R, Jordan A, Hartvigsen J. Categorising the severity of neck pain: establishment of cut-points for use in clinical and epidemiological research. Pain 2005;119:176–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostelo RW, de Vet HC. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Prac Res Clin Rheumatol 2005;19:593–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J 2001;18:205–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 2005;14:798–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the Visual Analog Scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:1153–1157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant M, de Bellefeuille L, O'Donoughue S, Grahovac S. Criterion validity of the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) goniometer for cervical flexion and extension. Spine 2000;25:324–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant M, Duclos E, Laflèche S, Mayer A, Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Brosseau L, O'Sullivan JP. Validity study for the cervical range of motion device used for lateral flexion in patients with neck pain. Spine 2002;27:812–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant M, Smeeters C, Breton AM, Breton E, Corriveau H. Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults. J Ortho Sports Phys Ther 2006;36:242–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capuano-Pucci D, Rheault W, Aukai J, Bracke M, Day R, Pastrick M. Intratester and intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1991;72:338–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion – comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 1991;71:98–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ. A Comparison of a Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther 2001;81:776–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckumnueporn T. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Thai version of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck pain [Master thesis]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University; 2007. 104.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research. Applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Health; 2000. pp 435–436.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling M, Jull G, Wright A. Cervical mobilisation: concurrent effects on pain, sympathetic nervous system activity and motor activity. Man Ther 2001;6:72–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicenzino B, Collins D, Wright A. The initial effects of a cervical spine manipulative physiotherapy treatment on the pain and dysfunction of lateral epicondylalgia. Pain 1996;68:69–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright A. Hypoalgesia post-manipulative therapy: a review of a potential neurophysiological mechanism. Man Ther 1995;1:11–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiu TW, Wright A. To compare the effects of different rates of application of a cervical mobilisation technique on sympathetic outflow to the upper limb in normal subjects. Man Ther 1996;1:198–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bombardier C. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine 2000;25:3100–3103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:869–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:407–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar