A note on the theoretical framework of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II

References

• World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Federici S, Meloni F, Brogioni A, Lo Presti A. The disability models in the perspective of parents, teachers, and special needs educators: a qualitative data analysis. Open Educat J 2008;1:37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Federici S, Meloni F. Making decisions and judgments on disability: the disability representation of parents, teachers, and special needs educators. JEIC 2009;1:20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Schlote A, Richter M, Wunderlich MT, Poppendick U, Moller C, Schwelm K, Wallesch CW. WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives. Disabil Rehabil 2009. 31:855–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici S, Meloni F, Lo Presti A. International literature review on WHODAS II (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II). Life Span and Disability 2009;12:83–110.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). WHODAS-II – Disability Assessment Schedule Training Manual: a guide to administration. Geneva: WHO; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Sen A. Health: perception versus observation. BMJ 2002;324:860–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:628–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: WHO; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977;196:129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, Üstün TB. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:1173–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, McArdle R, Wilson RH, Doyle PJ. The WHO-DAS II: psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss. Trends Amplif 2005;9:111–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoon JS, Kim JM, Shin IS, Yang SJ, Zheng TJ, Lee HY. Development of Korean version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II-K) in community dwelling elders. J Korean Neuropsychiatric Assoc 2004;43:86–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ulug B, Ertugrul A, Gögüs A, Kabakçi E. Yetiyitimi Degerlendirme Çizelgesinin (WHO-DAS-II) sizofreni hastalarinda geçerlilik ve güvenilirligi. [Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-II (WHO-DAS-II) in schizophrenia]. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2001;12:121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Barquero JL, Vázquez Bourgón ME, Herrera Castanedo S, Saiz J, Uriarte M, Morales F, Gaite L, Herrán A, Üstün TB, Grupo Cantabria en Discapacidades. Versión en lengua española de un nuevo cuestionario de evaluación de discapacidades de la OMS (WHO-DAS-II): Fase initial de desarrollo y estudio piloto. / Spanish version of the new World Health Organization Disablement Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS-II): initial phase of development and pilot study. Actas Españolas De Psiquiatría 2000;28:77–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron M, Hudson M, Taillefer S. Preliminary study of the validity of the World Health Organization Disease [sic.] Assessment Schedule (WHODAS II) in patients with scleroderma (ssc). Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64(Suppl 3):948.
   Google Scholar
• Buist-Bouwman M, Ormel J, De Graaf R, Vilagut G, Alonso J, Van Sonderen E, Vollebergh W. The ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 Investigators. Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule used in the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2008;17:185–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Korff M, Crane P, Alonso J, Vilagut G, Angermeyer M, Bruffaerts R, de Girolamo G, Gureje O, de Graaf R, Huang Y, Iwata N, Karam EG, Kovess V, Lara C, Levinson D, Posada-Villa J, Scott KM, Ormel J. Modified WHODAS-II provides valid measure of global disability but filter items increased skewness. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:1132–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici S, Meloni F, Mancini A, Lauriola M, Belardinelli OM. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II: a contribution to the Italian validation. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:553–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto L, Epping-Jordan JE, Doyle P, Chatterji S, Üstün TB. The factor structure of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS II). Qual Life Res 2000;9:320.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle P, Prieto L, Epping-Jordan JE, Chatterji S, Üstün TB. Measurement properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS II) in stroke survivors. Qual Life Res 2000;9:321.
   Google Scholar
• Pösl M, Cieza A, Stucki G. Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients. Qual Life Res 2007;16:1521–1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). WHODAS II [Web Page] Available from: http://www.who.int/icidh/whodas/index. html. Last accessed July 2009.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Decade of disabled persons 1983–1992. World programme of action concerning disabled persons. New York, USA: United Nations; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York, USA: United Nations; 2006.
   Google Scholar