Employment maintenance and the factors that impact it after vocational rehabilitation and return to work

References

• Subramanian A, Desai A, Prakash L, Mital A. Changing trends in US injury profiles: revisiting non-fatal occupational injury statistics. J Occup Rehabil 2006;16:123–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marisol Concha-Barrientos DIN, Fingerhut M, Driscoll T, Leigh J. The global burden due to occupational injury. Am J Ind Med 2005;48:470–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ. Research and practice directions in risk for disability prediction and early intervention. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, editors. Handbook of complex occupational disability claims. NY: Pringer; 2005. pp 523–551.
   Google Scholar
• Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MNM, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occupat Rehab 2005;15:557–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasiak R, Kim J, Pransky G. Work disability and costs caused by recurrence of low back pain: longer and more costly than in first episodes. Spine 2006;31:219–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossignol M, Suissa S, Abenhaim L. The evolution of compensated occupational spinal injuries. A three-year follow-up study. Spine 1992;17:1043–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Battie MC. Work-related recovery expectations and the prognosis of chronic low back pain within a workers' compensation setting. J Occupat Environ Med 2005;47:428–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole DC, Mondloch MV, Hogg-Johnson S. Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes – a prospective study. Can Med Assoc J 2002;166:749–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonherr MC, Groothoff JW, Mulder GA, Schoppen T, Eisma WH. Vocational reintegration following spinal cord injury: expectations, participation and interventions. Spinal Cord 2004;42:177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abenhaim L, Suissa S, Rossignol M. Risk of recurrence of occupational back pain over three year follow up. Br J Ind Med 1988;45:829–833.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wasiak R, Verma S, Pransky G, Webster B. Risk factors for recurrent episodes of care and work disability: case of low back pain. J Occupat Environ Med 2004;46:68–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotters F, Hogg-Johnson S, Burdorf A. Health status, its perceptions, and effect on return to work and recurrent sick leave. Spine 2005;30:1086–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdorf A, Jansen JP. Predicting the long term course of low back pain and its consequences for sickness absence and associated work disability. Occup Environ Med 2006;63:522–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Battie MC. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 2: sustained recovery. Spine 2004;29:920–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy G, Young A. Return to work following spinal cord injury: interruptions the continuity of employment gained post-injury; 2001, 30 May–1 June. Surfers Paradise, Australia: Australian Society of Rehabilitation Counsellors.
   Google Scholar
• Vercillo A. Job retention success for individuals receiving vocational services after a work-related injury. Boston: Boston University; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Young AE. Return-to-work experiences: Prior to receiving vocational services. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:2013–2022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Lenexa, Kansas: AAPOR; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Stamm T, Machold K. The international classification of functioning, disability and health in practice in rheumatological care and research. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2007;19:184–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan CH, Albright KJ, Lequerica A. Using the ICF to code and analyse women's disability narratives. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:978–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar V, Daumen ME, Conley DJ, Stone JH. The use of ICF codes for information retrieval in rehabilitation research: an empirical study. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:955–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw WS, Robertson MM, Pransky G, McLellan RK. Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. J Occup Rehabil 2003;13:129–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotters F, Meerding WJ, Burdorf A. Reduced productivity after sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders and its relation to health outcomes. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005;31:367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JH, de Boer AG, Blonk RW, van Dijk FJ. Supervisory behaviour as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work due to mental health problems. Occup Environ Med 2004;61:817–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysaght RM, Larmour-Trode S. An exploration of social support as a factor in the return-to-work process. Work 2008;30:255–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2101–2114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasiak R, Young AE, Roessler RT, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR. Measuring return to work. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:766–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaousides T, Ashman T, Seter C. The psychological effects of employment after traumatic brain injury: objective and subjective indicators. Rehabil Psychol 2008;53:456–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack W, McPherson K, McNaughton H. Success in the workplace following traumatic brain injury: are we evaluating what is most important? Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:290–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young AE, Murphy GC. A social psychology approach to measuring vocational rehabilitation intervention effectiveness. J Occup Rehab 2002;12:175–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny D. The role of rehabiliation providers in occupational rehabilitation: providing for whom? Part 1: Self-perception. Aust J Rehab Counsel 1998;4:97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell Research and Consulting. National return-to-work monitor 1999/2000. Melbourne: Campbell; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Westmorland MG, Buys N. A comparison of disability management practices in Australian and Canadian workplaces. Work 2004;23:31–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. Standard occupational classification 2000. London: The Stationery Office; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Management and Budget. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Manual. Washington, DC: Government Print Office; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational injury and illness classification manual. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• United States. BLS handbook of methods. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1997.
   Google Scholar