Instruments used to assess functional limitations in workers applying for disability benefit: a systematic review

References

• Spanjer J. The reproducibility in disability assessment: a literature search. Tijdschrift voor Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde 2001;9:195–198.
   Google Scholar
• Söderberg E, Alexanderson K. Sickness certification practices of physicians: a review of the literature. Scand J Public Health 2003;31:460–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organisation2001.
   Google Scholar
• Innes E, Straker L. Reliability of work-related assessments. Work 1999;13:107–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Innes E, Straker L. Validity of work-related assessments. Work 1999;13:125–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matheson LN, Kaskutas V, McCowan S, Shaw H, Webb C. Development of a database of functional assessment measures related to work disability. J Occup Rehabil 2001;11:177–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores L, Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB. Objectification of functional improvement after nonoperative care. Spine 1997;22:1622–1633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine 2005;30:130–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RM, Schmuck G, Allwood S, Sanchez M, Shea R, Wark G. Psychometric evaluation of health-related work outcome measures for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:504–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PP, Frings-Dresen MHW. Assessment of functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system in the context of work, daily living, and sport: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:253–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes E. Reliability and validity of functional capacity evaluations: an update. Int J Disabil Manage Res 2006;1:135–148.
   Google Scholar
• Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PP, Frings-Dresen MH. Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2004;77:527–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz IZ, Crook J, Berkowitz J, Milner R, Meloche GR. Predicting return to work after low back injury using the Psychosocial Risk for Occupational Disability Instrument: a validation study. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:365–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd edUpper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc2000.
   Google Scholar
• Menard MR, Hoens AM. Objective evaluation of functional capacity: medical, occupational, and legal settings. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994;19:249–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreider B. Latent work disability and reporting bias. J Hum Resour 1999;34:734–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer J, Mooney V, Matheson L, Leggett S, Verna J, Balourdas G, DeFilippo G. Reliability and validity of a new computer-administered pictorial activity and task sort. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:203–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DlAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LA, de Vet HCW.Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JA, Fulton-Kehoe D, Franklin G, Wickizer TM, Wu R. Comparison of the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and generic health status measures: a population-based study of workers' compensation back injury claimants. Spine 2003;28:1061–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin ML, Butler RJ, Johnson WG, Cote P. Self-reported severity measures as predictors of return-to-work outcomes in occupational back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:683–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Battie MC, Asante AK. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: validity in workers' compensation claimants. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:1294–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Battie MC. Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker's compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil 2003;13:287–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Battie MC, Cassidy JD. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. Part 1: timely return to work. Spine 2004;29:914–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Battie MC. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. Part 2: sustained recovery. Spine 2004;29:920–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Battie MC. Factors influencing results of functional capacity evaluations in workers' compensation claimants with low back pain. Phys Ther 2005;85:315–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Battie MC, Asante A. Development and validation of a short-form functional capacity evaluation for use in claimants with low back disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2006;16:53–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Battie MC. Does functional capacity evaluation predict recovery in workers' compensation claimants with upper extremity disorders? Occup Environ Med 2006;63:404–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucker KS, Metzler HM. Predicting subsequent employment status of SSA disability applicants with chronic pain. Clin J Pain 1995;11:22–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. I. Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 1983;8:141–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M, Binkley J. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can 1995;47:258–263.
   Google Scholar
• Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL, Matheson LM. Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical Functional Capacity Evaluation. Work 1999;12:145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Statline, Dutch Bureau for Statistics [Internet]. The Hague, Netherlands. Electronic Citation. http://statline.cbs.nl. Last accessed 12 February\ 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 2002;82:8–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998;27:331–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine 2006;31:598–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolles BM, Buchbinder R, Beaton DE. A study compared nine patient-specific indices for musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:791–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucker KS, Metzler HM, Kregel J. Standardization of chronic pain assessment: a multiperspective approach. Clin J Pain 1996;12:94–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbain DA, Rosomoff HL, Goldberg M, Cutler R, Abdel-Moty E, Khalil TM, Rosomoff RS. The prediction of return to the workplace after Multidisciplinary Pain Center treatment. Clin J Pain 1993;9:3–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pransky GS, Dempsey PG. Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluations. J Occup Rehabil 2004;14:217–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer WEL, Besseling JJM, Willems JHBM. Organisation of disability evaluation in 15 countries. Pratiques et Organisations de Soins 2007;38:205–217.
   Google Scholar
• Spanjer J, Krol B, Brouwer S, Popping R, Groothoff JW, Klink JJL van der. Reliability and validity of the Disability Assessment Structured Interview (DASI): a tool for assessing functional limitations in claimants. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar