Functioning and disability in traumatic brain injury: the Italian patient perspective in developing ICF Core Sets

References

• Jaracz K, Kozubski W. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2008;42:525–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:932–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagulayan KF, Temkin NR, Machamer J, Dikmen SS. A longitudinal study of health related quality of life after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:611–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:622–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, Üstün TB, Stucki G. Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:205–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Üstün B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Steinbuechel N, Petersen C, Bullinger M. Assessment of health-related quality of life in persons after traumatic brain Injury – development of the Qolibri, a specific measure. Acta Neurochir Supp 2005;93:43–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bilbao A, Kennedy C, Chatterrji S, Ustun B, Barquero JL, Barth JT. The ICF: applications of the WHO model of functioning, disability and health to brain injury rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation 2003;18:239–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce CA, Hanks RA. Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury and the World Health Organization model of disability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006;85:889–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temkin NR, Corrigan JD, Dikmen SS, Machamer J. Social functioning after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2009;24:460–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrona RM. Disability and return to work outcomes after traumatic brain injury: results from the Washington State Industrial Insurance Fund. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:650–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamee S, Walker W, Cifu DX, Wehman PH. Minimizing the effect of TBI-related physical sequelae on vocational return. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009;46:893–908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varjabićć M, Bakran Z, Tusek S, Bujisićć G. Assessment of long-term activity limitations and participation restrictions of persons with traumatic brain injury using the disability rating scale. Coll Antropol 2010;34 (Suppl 1):157–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andelic N, Sigurdardottir S, Schanke AK, Sandvik L, Sveen U, Roe C. Disability, physical health and mental health 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1122–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO2001.
   Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Üstün TB. Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:281–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiachini B, Pisoni C, Cieza A, Cazzulani B, Giustini A, Pistarini C. Developing ICF core set for subjects with traumatic brain injury: an Italian clinical perspective. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010;46:27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernabeu M, Laxe S, Lopez R, Stucki G, Ward A, Barnes M, Kostanjsek N, Reed G, Tate R, Whyte J, Zasler N, Cieza A. Developing core sets for persons with traumatic brain injury based on the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:464–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. Br Med J 2000;320:50–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 2000;284:357–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 1998;2:1–272.
   Google Scholar
• Sim J. Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. J Adv Nurs 1998;28:345–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. Qualitative research methods series, Vol. 16. 2nd edThousand Oaks: Sage1997.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn S, Schumm JS, Sinagub J. Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage1996.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: Sage2000.
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage1994.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DL, Krueger RA. When to use focus groups and why. Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the artIn: Morgan DL. Newbury Park: Sage1993. pp 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. Br Med J 1995;311:299–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell RA, Single HM, Lloyd KR. Focus groups in mental health research: enhancing the validity of user and provider questionnaires. Int J Soc Psychiatry 1996;42:193–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen M, Cieza A, Stamm TA, Amann E, Kollerits B, Stucki G. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groups. Arthrit Res Ther 2006;8:R84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragnarsson KJ. Results of the NIH consensus Conference on “Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury”. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2002;20:103–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levels of cognitive function scale (Original scale Co-authored by Hagen et al.,). Communication disorders service. Ranchos Los Amigos Hospital1972. Rev 1997 by Hagen C, 225 Winterhawk Lane, Encintas California 92024.
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Neurology: assessment and management of persons in the persistent vegetative state. Summary Statement. Neurology 1995;45:1015–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes MP, Ward AB. Oxford handbook of rehabilitation medicine. Oxford: Oxford University press2005.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage1990.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchberger I, Sinnott A, Charlifue S, Kovindha A, Lüthi H, Campbell R, Zwecker M, Scheuringer M, Cieza A. Functioning and disability in spinal cord injury from the consumer perspective: an international qualitative study using focus groups and the ICF. Spinal Cord 2010;48:603–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen M, Stamm TA, Stucki G, Cieza A. Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of two qualitative methods. Qual Life Res.
   Google Scholar
• Jennett B, Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage: a syndrome in search of a name. Lancet 1972;1:734–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S. Interviews – an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. California: Sage1996.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson G. Psychological qualitative research from a phenomenological perspective. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiskell International1995.
   Google Scholar
• Ewert T, Fuessl M, Cieza A, Andresen C, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Identification of the most common patients problems in patients with chronic conditions using ICF checklist. J Rehabil Med 2004;36 (Suppl)44;5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Grill E, Lipp B, Boldt C, Stucki G, Koenig E. Identification of relevant ICF categories by patients with neurological conditions in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:459–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas AIR, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain Injury in adults. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:728–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovasik D, Kerr ME, Alexander S. Traumatic brain injury research. A review of clinical studies. Crit Care Nurs Q 2001;23:24–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobsson LJ, Westerberg M. Health-related quality-of-life and life satisfaction 6–15 years after traumatic brain injuries in northern Sweden. Brain Inj 2010;24:1075–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi M, Sattin D, Raggi A, Frosi G, Pisoni C, Pistarini C, Compostini A, Manera M, Croci M, Guizzetti GB. Functioning and disability in the vegetative state: results from a pilot study in Italy. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31 (Suppl 1): S128–S133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson G, Mohr R, Redman A. Cultural variations in the understanding of traumatic brain injury and brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Inj\ 2000;14(2):125–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis S, Gesler W, Smith G, Washburn S. Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: examples in the geography of health. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:1001–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knodel J. The design and analysis of focus group studies. Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the artIn: Morgan DL, editor. Newbury Park: Sage1993. pp 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. The future of focus groups. Qual Health Res 1995;5:524–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey AM. The group effect in focus groups: planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group research. Critical issues in qualitative research methodsIn: Morse JM, editor. Thousand Oaks: Sage1994. pp 225–241.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin NK. The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill1978.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour R. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? Br Med J 2001;322:1115–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. Br Med J 2000;320:114–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar