Responsiveness and sensitivity of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale Danish version

References

• Anderson CS, Carter KN, Wallace JB, Hackett ML, Broad JB, Bonita R. Very long-term outcome after stroke in Auckland, New Zealand. Stroke 2004;35:1920–1924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carod-Artal J, Egido JA, Gonzàlez JL, de Seijas EV. Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke, experience of a stroke-unit. Stroke 2000;31:2995–3000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaracz K, Kozubski W. Quality of life in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand 2003;107:324–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong KH, Yang SY. Health-related quality of life among chronic stroke survivors attending a rehabilitation clinic. Singapore Med J 2006;47(3):213–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphine S, Côté R, Durcan L, Carlton J. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1035–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm JW, Donnan GA, Dewey HM, Macdonell RAL, Gilligan AK, Srikanth V, Thrift AG. Quality of life after stroke: the north east Melbourne stroke incidence study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2004;35(10):2340–2345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CS, Laubscher S, Burns R. Validation of the short form 36 (sf-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke 1996;27:1812–1816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart JC, Williams LS, Moran K, Thompson AJ. Quality of life measurement after stroke: uses and abuses of the sf-36. Stroke 2002;33:1176–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranciukaite D, Rastenyte D. Measurement of quality of life in stroke patients. Medicina (Kaunas) 2006;42(9):709–716.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams LS. Health-related quality of life outcomes in stroke. Neuroepidemiology 1998;17:116–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke 1999;30:1362–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muus I, Ringsberg KC. Stroke specific quality of life scale (SS-QoL) Danish adaptation and a pilot study for testing psychometric properties. Scand J Caring Sci 2005;19:140–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muus I, Williams LS, Ringsberg KC. Validation of the stroke specific quality of life scale, SS-QoL ©, test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QoL-DK). Clin Rehabil 2006;21(7):620–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scientific Advisory Committee. Instrument review criteria. Medical Outcomes Trust Bulletin 1995; (September):I–IV.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46: 1417–1432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life – assessment, analysis and interpretation. New York: Wiley & Sons; 2000. p 404.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth HB, Horner RD, Edwards LJ, Matchar DB. Depression and other determinants of values placed on current health state by stroke patients: evidence from the VA Acute Stroke (VASt) study. Stroke 2000;31:2603–2609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suenkeler IH, Nowak M, Misselwitz B, Kugler C, Schreiber W, Oertel WH. Timecourse of health-related quality of life as determined 3, 6 and 12 months after stroke. Relationship to neurological deficit, disability and depression. J Neurol 2002;249:1160–1167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muus I, Christensen D, Johnsen SP, Harder I, Kirkevold M, Andersen G, Ringsberg KC. Fatigue and health related quality of life after stroke [[abstract]]. Cape Town, South Africa; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Liang MH, Lew RA, Stucki G, Fortin PR, Daltroy L. Measuring clinically important changes with patient-oriented questionnaires. Med Care 2002;40(suppl):II-45–II-51.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. p 231.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen D, Johnson SP, Wade DT, Harder I, Kirkevold M, Andersen G. Dimensions of post-stroke fatigue: a two-year follow-up study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;26(2):134–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets EMA, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JCJM. The multidimensional fatigue inventory. J Psychosom Res 1995;39:315–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentile JS, Delarozière C, Favre F, Sambuc R, San Marco JL. Validation of the French “Mulitidimensional Fatigue Inventory” (MFI-20). Eur J Cancer Care 2003;12(1):58–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bech P, Rasmussen NA, Raabaek Olsen L, Noerholm V, Abildgaard W. The sensitivity and specificity of the major depression inventory using the present state examination as the index of diagnostic validity. J Affect Disord 2001;66:159–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen LR, Jensen DV, Noerholm V, Martiny K, Bech P. The internal and external validity of the major depression inventory in measuring severity of depressive states. Psychol Med 2003;33(2):351–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scandinavian Stroke Study Group. Multicenter trial of hemodilution in ischemic stroke – background and study protocol. Stroke 1985;16(5):885–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Husted JA, Cook JR, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace D, Duncan PW, Lai SM. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the motor component of the functional independence measure in stroke. The impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:922–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juniper E, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R. How to develop and validate a new health-related quality-of-life instrument. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trialsIn: Spilker B, editor. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996. pp 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989;27(3 suppl):S178–S189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health related quality of life. The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003; 41(5):582–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76(5):406–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkevold M. The unfolding illness trajectory of stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:887–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz CE, Andresen EM, Nosek MA, Krahn GL. Response shift theory: important implications for measuring quality of life in people with disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:529–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar