The ups and downs of social participation: experiences of wheelchair users in Norway

References

• Bricout JC, Gray DB. Community receptivity: the ecology of disabled persons' participation in the physical, political and social environments. Scand J Disabil Res 2006;8:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall A. Unpacking “Participation”: models, meanings and practices. Community Dev J 2008;43:269–283.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J. Participation and occupation. Can J Occup Ther 2005;72:195–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ebersold S. Affiliating participation for active citizenship. Scand J Disabil Res 2007;9:237–253.
   Google Scholar
• Law MC. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther 2002; 56:640–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosial- og helsedirektoratet. Fra bruker til borger. En strategi for nedbygging av funksjonshemmende barrierer [[From client to citizens: strategies for reducing disabling barriers]]. Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste, Informasjonsforvaltning2001. p 22.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations. Internet. 2006. Electronic Citation. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml. Last accessed April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Molin M. Delaktighet inom handikappområdet - en begreppsanalys [[Participation and disability – an analysis of concept]]. Delaktighetens språkIn: Gustavsson AR, editor. Lund: Studentlitteratur2004.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Internet. World Health Organisation; 2001. Electronic Citation. http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/. Last accessed 26 April 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Björck-Åkesson E, Granlund M. Delaktighet - ett centralt begrepp i WHO:s klassifikation av funktionstillstånd, funktionshinder och hãlsa (ICF) [[Participation – an important concept in WHO's classification of functioning, disability and health]]. Deltaktighetens språkIn: Gustavsson AR, editor. Lund: Studentlitteratur2004. pp 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Cardol M, De Jong BA, Ward CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:970–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høyem A, editor. ICF i rehabilitering - forståelse og bruk [[ICF in rehabilitation – understanding and use]]. Tønsberg: Forlaget Aldring og Helse2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:569–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høyem A, Thornquist E. Et kritisk blikk på ICF-måleverktøy og forståelsesmodell [[A critical view of ICF – measurement and model of understanding]]. Sykepleien Forskning 2010; 1:46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for? Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:596–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggström A, Lund ML. The complexity of participation in daily life: a qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, Whiteneck G, Bogner J, Rodriguez E. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borell L, Asaba E, Rosenberg L, Schult ML, Townsend E. Exploring experiences of “participation” among individuals living with chronic pain. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:76–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vik K, Nygård L, Borell L, Josephsson S. Agency and engagement: older adults' experiences of participation in occupation during home-based rehabilitation. Can J Occup Ther 2008;75:262–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King G, Law M, King S, Rosenbaum P, Kertoy MK, Young NL. A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of children with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2003;23:63–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbour RS, Kitzinger J, editors. Developing focus group research. Politics, theory and practiceLondon: Sage1999.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. Moderating focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage2006.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ, editor. Qualitative research & evaluation method. 3rd edThousand Oaks, CA: Sage2002.
   Google Scholar
• Barne- og likestillingsdepartementet. Om lov om forbud mot diskriminering på grunn av nedsatt funksjonsevne (diskriminerings- og tilgjengelighetsloven) [[The Norwegian anti-discrimination and accessibility act]]. Oslo: Barne- og likestillingsdepartementet, Ot.prp2007.
   Google Scholar
• Vik K, Lilja M, Nygård L. The influence of the environment on participation subsequent to rehabilitation as experienced by elderly people in Norway. Scand J Occup Ther 2007;14:86–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cornwall A, Gaventa J. From users and choosers to makers and shapers: repositioning participation in social policy. Brighton, England: Institute of development studies, Brighton, Susses BN1 9RE England2001. pp 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall A. Democratising engagement: what the UK can learn from international experience. London: Demos2008.
   Google Scholar
• Amdam R, Bergem R. Kriterium for evaluering av partnerskap og planlegging i kommunalt folkehelsearbeid [[Criteria for evaluating partnerships and planning in municipal public health work]]. Volda 2008 Report No.: 222.
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage2003.
   Google Scholar