2,393
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Engaging the hearts and minds of clinicians in outcome measurement – the UK rehabilitation outcomes collaborative approach

, , , , &
Pages 1871-1879 | Accepted 01 Feb 2012, Published online: 16 Apr 2012

References

  • Garland AF, Kruse M, Aarons GA. Clinicians and outcome measurement: what’s the use? J Behav Health Serv Res 2003;30:393–405.
  • Hatfield DR, Ogles BM. Why some clinicians use outcome measures and others do not. Adm Policy Ment Health 2007;34:283–291.
  • Jensen-Doss A, Hawley KM. Understanding barriers to evidence-based assessment: clinician attitudes toward standardized assessment tools. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2010;39:885–896.
  • Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C, Miceli E, Shah P. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Phys Ther 2009;89:125–135.
  • Hillier S, Comans T, Sutton M, Amsters D, Kendall M. Development of a participatory process to address fragmented application of outcome measurement for rehabilitation in community settings. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:511–520.
  • Skinner A, Turner-Stokes L. The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:609–615.
  • Michener LA. Patient- and clinician-rated outcome measures for clinical decision making in rehabilitation. J Sport Rehabil 2011;20:37–45.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Sutch S, Dredge R. Healthcare tariffs for specialist inpatient neurorehabilitation services: Rationale and development of a UK casemix and costing methodology. Clin Rehabil 2012;26:264–279.
  • Feinstein AR. Clinimetric perspectives. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:635–640.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34–42.
  • Green J, Gordon R. The development of Version 2 of the AN-SNAP casemix classification system. Aust Health Rev 2007;31 Suppl 1:S68–S78.
  • Victoria Public Hospitals Policy and Funding Guidelines. Melbourne: Department of Human Services, 1999-2000; Victoria, Australia.
  • Disler PB, Roy CW, Smith BP. Predicting hours of care needed. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:139–143.
  • Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke 1997;28:1550–1556.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Disler PB, Nair A, Wade DT. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 CD004170.
  • Cost-efficient service provision in neurorehabilitation: Defining needs, costs and outcomes for people with long-term neurological conditions (RP-PG-0407-10185). Lead applicant: Professor Lynne Turner-Stokes. Northwick Park Hospital. London: National Institute for Health Research Programme Grant for Applied Research. 2008.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Williams H, Siegert RJ. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale version 2: a clinimetric evaluation in patients with severe complex neurodisability. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2010;81:146–153.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Tonge P, Nyein K, Hunter M, Nielson S, Robinson I. The Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS): a measure of nursing dependency in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1998;12:304–318.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Nyein K, Halliwell D. The Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment (NPCNA): a directly costable outcome measure in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:253–267.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Shaw A, Law J, Rose H. Development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:922–937.
  • Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:64–67.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Nyein K, Turner-Stokes T, Gatehouse C. The UK FIM+FAM: development and evaluation. Functional Assessment Measure. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:277–287.
  • National Definition Set for Specialised Services No 7: “Complex specialised rehabilitation for brain injury and complex disability (Adult)”. Third Edition. London: Department of Health. 2009.
  • Skinner A, Turner-Stokes L. The use of standardised outcome measures for rehabilitation in the UK. Clin Rehabil 2005;20:609–615.
  • Nyein K, McMichael L, Turner-Stokes L. Can a Barthel score be derived from the FIM? Clin Rehabil 1999;13:56–63.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Paul S, Williams H. Efficiency of specialist rehabilitation in reducing dependency and costs of continuing care for adults with complex acquired brain injuries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2006;77:634–639.
  • Turner-Stokes L. Cost-efficiency of longer-stay rehabilitation programmes: can they provide value for money? Brain Inj 2007;21:1015–1021.
  • Nyein K, Thu A, Turner-Stokes L. Complex specialized rehabilitation following severe brain injury: a UK perspective. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2007;22:239–247.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Disler R, Williams H. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale: a simple, practical tool to identify ‘complex specialised’ services in neurological rehabilitation. Clin Med 2007;7:593–599.
  • Turner-Stokes L; British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. Clinical governance in rehabilitation medicine. The state of the art in 2002. A British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine report. Clin Rehabil 2002;16 Suppl 1:1–60.
  • Turner-Stokes L. Outcome measures for in-patient neurorehabilitation settings – a commentary. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1999;9:329–343.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Williams H, Johnson J. Goal attainment scaling: does it provide added value as a person-centred measure for evaluation of outcome in neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury? J Rehabil Med 2009;41:528–535.
  • Kiresuk T, Sherman R. Goal attainment scaling: A general method of evaluating comprehensive mental health programmes. Community Ment Health J 1968;4:443–453.
  • Hurn J, Kneebone I, Cropley M. Goal setting as an outcome measure: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:756–772.
  • Kiresuk T, Smith A, Cardillo J. Goal attainment scaling: Application, theory and measurement. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994.
  • Steenbeek D, Ketelaar M, Galama K, Gorter JW. Goal attainment scaling in paediatric rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007;49:550–556.
  • Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:362–370.
  • Schlosser RW. Goal attainment scaling as a clinical measurement technique in communication disorders: a critical review. J Commun Disord 2004;37:217–239.
  • Levine B, Robertson IH, Clare L, Carter G, Hong J, Wilson BA, Duncan J, Stuss DT. Rehabilitation of executive functioning: an experimental-clinical validation of goal management training. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2000;6:299–312.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Poppleton R, Williams H, et al. Using the UKROC dataset to make the case for resources to improve cost-efficiency in neurological rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil (In Press).