Group modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) in a clinical setting

References

• Parker VM, Wade DT, Langton Hewer R. Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. Int Rehabil Med 1986;8:69–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Upper extremity interventions (Module 10). [Internet]; August 2010 [cited 2012 01/28]. Available from: http://www.ebrsr.com/reviews_details.php?Upper-Extremity-Interventions-31
   Google Scholar
• Barker RN, Gill TJ, Brauer SG. Factors contributing to upper limb recovery after stroke: a survey of stroke survivors in Queensland Australia. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:981–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peurala SH, Kantanen MP, Sjögren T, Paltamaa J, Karhula M, Heinonen A. Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy on activity and participation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 2012;26:209–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys 2006;42:257–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf SL. Revisiting constraint-induced movement therapy: are we too smitten with the mitten? Is all nonuse “learnedâ? and other quandaries. Phys Ther 2007;87:1212–1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettmers C, Teske U, Hamzei F, Uswatte G, Taub E, Weiller C. Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:204–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P, McGrath RE. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:14–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, Kölbel S, Rockstroh B, Taub E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1374–1377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Wu CY, Liu JS, Chen YT, Hsu CJ. Constraint-induced therapy versus dose-matched control intervention to improve motor ability, basic/extended daily functions, and quality of life in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:160–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson T, Thalman L. A modified constraint-induced movement therapy regimen for individuals with upper extremity hemiplegia. Can J Occup Ther 2007;74:115–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sterr A, Saunders A. CI therapy distribution: theory, evidence and practice. NeuroRehabilitation 2006;21:97–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coding interpretations: group therapy coding scenarios. [Internet]; February 2011 [cited 2012 01/28]. Available from: http://www.apta.org/Payment/Coding/GroupTherapyScenarios/
   Google Scholar
• Brogårdh C, Sjölund BH. Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:218–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijntjes M, Hobbeling V, Hamzei F, Dohse S, Ketels G, Liepert J, Weiller C. Individual factors in constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005;19:238–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Devillé WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999;30:2369–2375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung DP, Ng AK, Fong KN. Effect of small group treatment of the modified constraint induced movement therapy for clients with chronic stroke in a community setting. Hum Mov Sci 2009;28:798–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, Van Hullenaar S, Sanford J, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993;24:58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 2006;67:1189–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motor and sensory impairment remediation post acquired brain injury (Module 4). [Internet]; c2011 [cited 2012 01/28]. London, Ontario, Canada: ABIEBR. Available from: http://www.abiebr.com/module/4-motor-sensory-impairment-remediation-post-acquired-brain-injury.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw SE, Morris DM, Uswatte G, McKay S, Meythaler JM, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy for recovery of upper-limb function following traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42:769–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Portney, LG, Watkins, MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001;32:1635–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW 3rd, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:750–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, Rose DK, Winstein CJ, Taub E, Giuliani C, Pearson SL. The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005;19:194–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf Motor Function Test. [Internet]; c2011 [cited 2012 01/28]. Available from: www.medicine.mcgill.ca/strokengine-assess/module_wmft)intro-en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:407–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin KC, Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Chen CL, Jang Y, Liu JS. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:429–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, DM. UAB training for CI therapy manual. Received May, 2007 during CI Therapy Training Course, Birmingham, Alabama>.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1990;57:82–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar