Facilitators and hindrances in the experiences of Ugandans with and without disabilities when seeking access to microcredit schemes

References

• Cramm JM, Finkenflügel H. Exclusion of disabled people from microcredit in Africa and Asia: a literature study. Asia Pac Disabil Rehab J 2008;19:15–33.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo R, Moore K. Including disabled people in poverty reduction work: “nothing about us, without us”. World Dev 2003;31:571–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis C. Microfinance from the point of view of women with disabilities: lessons from Zambia and Zimbabwe. Gend Dev 2004;12:28–39.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas M. Feasibility of integrating PWD in savings and credit programmes in Bangladesh. Asia Pac Disabil Rehab J 2000;11:27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Mersland R. Microcredit for self-employed disabled persons in developing countries. Munich Personal RePEc: PMRA paper No. 2069; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas M, Thomas MJ. Micro-credit schemes for rehabilitation of disabled persons Associate Publication of Asia Pac Disabil Rehab J 1999; 1. Available t: http://www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/english/asia/resource/apdrj/z13fm0200/z13fm0213.htm. Retrieved May 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Handicap International. Good practices for the economic inclusion of PWD in developing countries. Funding mechanisms for self-employment. Handicap International. 2006. Available at: www.handicap-international.org. Retrieved March 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Coleridge P. Disabled people and economic empowerment. Zeitschrift Behinderung und Dritte Welt 2006;17:4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer S. The inclusion of disabled people in mainstream micro finance programmes, disability and MF. Leonard Cheshire International. 2003. Available at: http://www.chronicpoverty.org/uploads/publication_files/CP_2003_Dyer.pdf. Retrieved May 2007.
   Google Scholar
• ILO. Disability and poverty reduction strategies - how to ensure that access of persons with disabilities to decent and productive work is part of the PRSP process; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Elwan A. Poverty and disability: a survey of the literature. Discussion paper No. 9932. Social Protection Department. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Despouy L. Human rights and disabled persons. In Study series 6. Geneva and New York: Centre for Human Rights and United Nations; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Uganda Bureau of Statistics. Uganda Population and Housing Census. 2002. Available at: http://www.ubos.org/onlinefiles/uploads/ubos/pdf%20documents/2002%20Census%20Final%20Reportdoc.pdf. Accessed on June 2007.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Statistics Division. 2007. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/default.htm. Accessed on June 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bwire FN, Mukasa G, Mersland R. Access to mainstream microfinance services by persons with disabilities – lessons learned from Uganda. Disability Studies Quarterly 2009;29. Available at: http://www.dsq-sds.org/article/view/168/168. Accessed on September 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Neufeldt AH, Albright A, editors. Disability and self-directed employment: business development models. York, ON: Captus University Publications, International Development Research Centre; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Simanowitz A. Microfinance for the poorest: a review of issues and ideas for contribution of Impact. CGAP Microfinance Gateway. 2001. Available at: www.microfiancegateway.or/files/3395Anton.com. Accessed on June 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mukibi SN, Mulya D. Study on the involvement of entrepreneurs with disabilities in the IYB Uganda programme. 1997. Available atwww.ilo.org/public/english/employment/ent/papers/sed24.htm. Accessed on May 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks S. In combating social exclusion how are interventions on the “excluded” related to interventions on the “excluding society”? A comparative analysis of leprosy rehabilitation and prevention in Bangladesh. Presented at the conference Staying Poor: Poverty and Development Policy. 2003. Available at: www.chronicpoverty.org. Retrieved June 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg R. Does microcredit really help poor people? CGAP Focus Note, No. 59; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler P, Levine DI, Moretti E. Do microfinance programmes help families insure consumption against illness? Health Econ 2009;18:257–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SR. Political subjectivity: applications of Q-methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Cross RM. Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology. Health Educ Res 2005;20:206–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown Steven, R. (1991/1992). A Q Methodological tutorial. Eight postings to QUALRS-L@UGA.
   Google Scholar
• Donner JC. Using q-sorts in participatory processes: an introduction to the methodology. In Social Analysis: Selected Tools and Techniques (Social Development Papers No. 36, pp. 24–59). Washington, DC: The World Bank, Social Development Department; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cramm JM, van Exel J, Møller V, Finkenflügel H. Patient views on determinants of compliance with tuberculosis treatment in the eastern cape, South Africa: an application of q-methodology. Patient 2010;3:159–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Exel NJ, de Graaf G, Brouwer WB. “Everyone dies, so you might as well have fun!” Attitudes of Dutch youths about their health lifestyle. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:2628–2639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Exel J, de Graaf G, Brouwer W. Care for a break? An investigation of informal caregivers’ attitudes toward respite care using Q-methodology. Health Policy 2007;83:332–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risdon A, Eccleston C, Crombez G, McCracken L. How can we learn to live with pain? A Q-methodological analysis of the diverse understandings of acceptance of chronic pain. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:375–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tielen M, van Staa AL, Jedeloo S, van Exel NJ, Weimar W. Q-methodology to identify young adult renal transplant recipients at risk for nonadherence. Transplantation 2008;85:700–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenner PH, Dancey CP, Watts S. The understanding of their illness amongst people with irritable bowel syndrome: a Q methodological study. Soc Sci Med 2000;51:439–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant LD, Green JM, Hewison J. Understandings of Down’s syndrome: a Q methodological investigation. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:1188–1200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramm JM, van Exel J, Kuijsten R, Finkenflügel H. Use of the Q-methodology to study effects of supported employment on social integration according to people with mild intellectual disabilities. J Intell Disabil Res 2009;53:512–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuger L, van Exel NJA, Nieboer A. Needs of Persons with Severe Intellectual Disabilities: a Q-Methodological Study of clients with severe behavioural disorders and severe intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2008;21:466–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Exel NJA, de Graaf G.. Q-methodology: a sneak preview. 2005. Available at: http://www.qmethodology.net/PDF/Qmethodology% 20-%20A%20sneak%20preview.pdf. Accessed on May 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Schmolk P.. PQ Method version 2.11. 2002.. Available at: http://www.lrzmuenchen. de/~schmolk/qmethod. Accessed on May 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme D. Is microcredit good for poor people? A note on the dark side of microfinance. Small Enterprise Dev 2000;11:26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Social Development Division (SDD). Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Hidden sisters: women and girls with disabilities in the Asian and Pacific region. (ST/ESCAP/1548). New York: United Nations; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Murray C. Losing ground: American social policy 1950–80. New York: Basic Books; 1984.
   Google Scholar