Work-related self-report measures and assessment tools in cancer survivorship: A systematic literature review

References

• Torp S, Gudbergsson SB, Dahl AA, Fosså SD, Fløtten T. Social support at work and work changes among cancer survivors in Norway. Scand J Public Health 2011;39:33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peteet JR. Cancer and the meaning of work. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000;22:200–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen DM, Elverdam B. The meaning of work and working life after cancer: an interview study. Psychooncology 2008;17:1232–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerstein M, Harrington CB. Recommendations for the U.S. National Occupational Research Agenda: research on cancer survivorship and musculoskeletal disorders and work disability. J Occup Rehabil 2006;16:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahar KK, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Shields JJ. The impact of changes in employment status on psychosocial well-being: a study of breast cancer survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol 2008;26:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehnert A. Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2011;77:109–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short PF, Vasey JJ, Tunceli K. Employment pathways in a large cohort of adult cancer survivors. Cancer 2005;103:1292–1301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi KS, Kim EJ, Lim JH, Kim SG, Lim MK, Park JG, Park EC. Job loss and reemployment after a cancer diagnosis in Koreans - a prospective cohort study. Psychooncology 2007;16:205–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer AGEM de, Taskila T, Ojajärvi A, van Dijk FJH, Verbeek JHAM. Cancer survivors and unemployment: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA 2009, 301:753–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudbergsson SB, Fosså SD, Lindbohm ML, Dahl AA. Received and needed social support at the workplace in Norwegian and Finnish stage 1 breast cancer survivors: a study from the Nordic Study Group of Cancer and Work (NOCWO). Acta Oncol 2009;48:67–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehnert A, Koch U. Predictors of employment among cancer survivors after medical rehabilitation - a prospective study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaarschmidt U, Fischer A. AVEM - Arbeitsbezogenes Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster (Manual). Frankfurt/M: Swets Testservices. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Schaarschmidt U, Fischer A. AVEM – Arbeitsbezogenes Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster. Handanweisung. Frankfurt/M: Swets&Zeitlinger. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Schaarschmidt U, Fischer A. AVEM – Arbeitsbezogene Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster: Verfahrenskonzeption. 3rd edition. Frankfurt/M: Harcourt Test Services 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Heitzmann B, Schaarschmidt U, Kieschke U. Diagnostik beruflichen Bewältigungsverhaltens bei Rehapatienten – die Leistungsmöglichkeiten des Verfahrens AVEM im Bereich medizinischer Rehabilitation. Prax Klein Verhaltensmedizin Rehabilitation 2005, 70:269–280.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler R, Ranft A, Greitemann B, Heuft G. Arbeitsmotivation - Diagnostikinstrumente und ihre Relevanz in der Patientenversorgung. Zum Stand arbeitsbezogener Motivationsdiagnostik. Psychother Psych Med 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Voltmer E, Schwappach DL, Frank E, Wirsching M, Spahn C. Work-related behavior and experience patterns and predictors of mental health in German physicians in medical practice. Fam Med 2010;42:433–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pejtersen JH, Kristensen TS, Borg V, Bjorner JB. The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scand J Public Health 2010;38:8–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Høgh A, Borg V. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire–a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005;31:438–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nübling M, Vomstein M, Schmidt SG, Gregersen S, Dulon M, Nienhaus A. Psychosocial work load and stress in the geriatric care. BMC Public Health 2010;10:428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsen SV, Bjorner JB. Reliability of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scand J Public Health 2010;38:25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen NR, Stahlberg C, Strandberg-Larsen K, Kristensen TS, Zhang ZF, Hundrup YA, Grønbaek M. Are work-related stressors associated with diagnosis of more advanced stages of incident breast cancers? Cancer Causes Control 2008;19:297–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler R. Diagnostik von Arbeitsmotivation bei Rehabilitationspatienten: Unveröffentlichte Dissertation der Westfälischen Wilhelms−Universität. Münster 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ranft A, Fiedler R, Greitemann B, Heuft G. Optimierung und Konstruktvalidierung des Diagnostikinstruments für Arbeitsmotivation (DIAMO). Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2009, 59:21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinbeck U. Arbeitsmotivation. Weinheim: Juventa Verlag; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kehr HM. Integrating Implicit Motives, Explicit Motives, And Perceived Abilities: The Compensatory Model Of Work Motivation And Volition. 2004, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Sanne B, Torp S, Mykletun A, Dahl AA. The Swedish Demand-Control-Support Questionnaire (DCSQ): factor structure, item analyses, and internal consistency in a large population. Scand J Public Health 2005;33:166–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasek R, Theorell T. Healthy Work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 1998;3:322–355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gudbergsson SB, Fosså SD, Sanne B, Dahl AA. A controlled study of job strain in primary-treated cancer patients without metastases. Acta Oncol 2007;46:534–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudbergsson SB, Fosså SD, Dahl AA. NOCWO. A study of work changes due to cancer in tumor-free primary-treated cancer patients. A NOCWO study. Support Care Cancer 2008;16:1163–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R. The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 2004;58:1483–1499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1996;1:27–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rödel A, Siegrist J, Hessel A, Brähler E. Fragebogen zur Messung beruflicher Gratifikationskrisen. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 2004, 25:227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Neumann M, Wirtz M, Ernstmann N, Staratschek-Jox A, Stoelben E, Wolf J, Pfaff H. The influence of occupational stress factors on the nicotine dependence: a cross sectional study. Tob Induc Dis 2010;8:6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohr G, Rigotti T, Müller A. Irritations-Skala zur Erfassung arbeitsbezogener Beanspruchungsfolgen. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr GMA, Rigotti T. Normwerte der Skala Irritation: Zwei Dimensionen psychischer Beanspruchung. Diagnostica 2005, 51:12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopec JA, Esdaile JM. Occupational role performance in persons with back pain. Disabil Rehabil 1998;20:373–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopec JA. Measuring functional outcomes in persons with back pain: a review of back-specific questionnaires. Spine 2000;25:3110–3114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner JF, Cavender TA, Nowels CT, Beaty BL, Bradley CJ, Fairclough DL, Main DS. The impact of physical and psychosocial factors on work characteristics after cancer. Psychooncology 2008;17:138–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallner A, Elo A-L Gambrele F, Hottinen V, Knardahl S, Linstrom K, Skogstad A, Orhede E. Validation of the General Nordic Questionnaire for Psychological and Social Factors at Work. Nord: Nordic Council of Ministers Copenhagen, DK. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wännström I, Peterson U, Asberg M, Nygren A, Gustavsson JP. Psychometric properties of scales in the General Nordic Questionnaire for Psychological and Social Factors at Work (QPS): confirmatory factor analysis and prediction of certified long-term sickness absence. Scand J Psychol 2009;50:231–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström K, Elo AL Skogstad A, Dallner M, Gamberale F, Hottinen V, Kardahl S, Ørhede E. User`s Guide for the QPSNordic. General Nordic Questionnaire for psychological and social factors at work. TemaNord 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wännström I, Peterson U, Asberg M, Nygren A, Gustavsson JP. Can scales assessing psychological and social factors at work be used across different occupations? Work 2009;34:3–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuvesson H, Wann-Hansson C, Eklund M. The ward atmosphere important for the psychosocial work environment of nursing staff in psychiatric in-patient care. BMC Nurs 2011;10:12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taskila T, Martikainen R, Hietanen P, Lindbohm ML. Comparative study of work ability between cancer survivors and their referents. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:914–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudbergsson SB, Fosså SD, Dahl AA. Are there sex differences in the work ability of cancer survivors? Norwegian experiences from the NOCWO study. Support Care Cancer 2011;19:323–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehto-Järnstedt US, Ojanen M, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P. Cancer-specific social support received by newly diagnosed cancer patients: validating the new Structural-Functional Social Support Scale (SFSS) measurement tool. Support Care Cancer 2004;12:326–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Martikainen R, Lehto US, Hakanen J, Hietanen P. Cancer survivors’ received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer 2006;14:427–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittag O, Meyer T, Glaser-Möller N, Matthis C, Raspe H. Vorhersage der Erwerbstätigkeit in einer Bevölkerungsstichprobe von 4225 Versicherten der LVA über einen Prognosezeitraum von fünf Jahren mittels einer kurzen Skala (SPE-Skala). Gesundheitswesen 2006, 68:294–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittag O, Raspe H. Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der subjektiven Prognose der Erwerbstätigkeit: Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung an 4279 Mitgliedern der gesetzlichen Arbeiterrentenversicherung zu Reliabilität (Guttman-Skalierung) und Validität der Skala. Rehabilitation 2003, 42:169–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mittag O, Glaser-Möller N, Ekkernkamp M, Matthis C, Héon-Klin V, Raspe A, Raspe H: Prädiktive Validität einer kurzen Skala zur subjektiven Prognose der Erwerbstätigkeit (SPE-Skala) in einer Kohorte von LVA-Versicherten mit schweren Rückenschmerzen oder funktionellen Beschwerden der inneren Medizin. SozPraventivmed 2003, 48:361–369.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaufeli W, Salanova M, González-romá V, Bakker A. The Measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic. J Happiness Stud 2002, 3:71–92.
   Google Scholar
• Nerstad CG, Richardsen AM, Martinussen M. Factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) across occupational groups in Norway. Scand J Psychol 2010;51:326–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakanen JJ, Lindbohm ML. Work engagement among breast cancer survivors and the referents: the importance of optimism and social resources at work. J Cancer Surviv 2008;2:283–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuomi K, Huuhtanen P, Nykyri E, Ilmarinen J. Promotion of work ability, the quality of work and retirement. Occup Med (Lond) 2001;51:318–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselhorn H, Freude G. Der Work Ability Index - ein Leitfaden. 1st edition. Bremerhaven: Wirtschaftsverlag NW Verlag für neue Wissenschaft GmbH. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart BCH de. Test-retestreliabilityof the Work Ability Index questionnaire. Occup Med 2002, 52:177–181.
   Google Scholar
• Boer AGEM de, Verbeek JHAM, Spelten ER, Uitterhoeve ALJ, Ansink AC, de Reijke TM, Kammeijer M, Sprangers MAG, van Dijk FJH. Work ability and return-to-work in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2008, 98:1342–1347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamminga SJ, de Boer AG, Verbeek JH, Taskila T, Frings-Dresen MH. Enhancing return-to-work in cancer patients, development of an intervention and design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2010;10:345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner D, Amick BC 3rd, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cynn D. The Work Limitations Questionnaire. Med Care 2001;39:72–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner D, Amick BC 3rd., Lee JC, Rooney T, Rogers WH, Chang H, Berndt ER. Relationship of employee-reported work limitations to work productivity. Med Care 2003;41:649–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munir F. The Work Limitation Questionnaire. 36. Occup Med (Lond) 2008; Occup Med 2008, 58:310–311.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerstein M, Hansen JA, Calvio LC, Johnson L, Ronquillo JG. Work productivity in brain tumor survivors. J Occup Environ Med 2007;49:803–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen JA, Feuerstein M, Calvio LC, Olsen CH. Breast cancer survivors at work. J Occup Environ Med 2008;50:777–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg Gudbergsson S, Fosså SD, Dahl AA. Is cancer survivorship associated with reduced work engagement? A NOCWO Study. J Cancer Surviv 2008;2:159–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO): ICF – International Classification of Function-ing, Disability and Health. Genf; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Marnetoft SU, Selander J. Long-term effects of early versus delayed vocational rehabilitation–a four-year follow-up. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:741–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaguchi T, Okamura H, Nakaya N, Abe K, Abe Y, Umezawa S, Kurihara M, et al. Survey of the current status of cancer rehabilitation in Japan. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:559–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoving JL, Broekhuizen ML, Frings-Dresen MH. Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies. BMC Cancer 2009;9:117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. Health, Stress, and Coping. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Becker P: Theoretischer Rahmen. In Psychologie der seelischen Gesundheit, Band II. Persönlichkeitspsychologische Grundlagen, Bedingungsanalysen und Fördermöglichkeiten. Edited by Becker P, Minsel B. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1986:1–90.
   Google Scholar
• Udris I. Organisationale und personale Ressourcen der Salutogenese – Gesund bleiben trotz oder wegen Belastung? Zeitschrift für die gesamte Hygiene 1990, 36:453–455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Transactionaltheoryand research on emotionsand coping. Eur J Personality 1987:141–169.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson JV, Hall EM. Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health 1988;78:1336–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr G, Rigotti T, Müller A. Irritation – ein Instrument zur Erfassung psychischer Beanspruchung im Arbeitskontext. Skalen- und Itemparameter aus 15 Studien. Z Arb Organ 2005, 49:4–48.
   Google Scholar
• Seppälä P, Mauno S, Feldt T, Hakanen J, Kinnunen U, Tolvanen A, Schaufeli W. The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence. J Happiness Stud 2009, 10:459–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A. Work Ability Index. Helsinki 1994.
   Google Scholar