Measurement properties of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool: a systematic review

References

• Rudman DL, Tooke J, Eimantas TG, Hall M, Maloney KB. Preliminary investigation of the content validity and clinical utility of the Predischarge Assessment Tool. Can J Occup Ther 1998;65:3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Aminzadeh F, Dalziel WB. Older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review of patterns of use, adverse outcomes, and effectiveness of interventions. Ann Emerg Med 2002;39:238–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan GA, Williams AJ, Daly B, Abraham K. A randomized, controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary intervention after discharge of elderly from the emergency department–the DEED II study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:1417–1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963;185:914–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969;9:179–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Uniform Data Systems. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Adult FIM). Version 5.0. Buffalo (NY): State University of New York; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darzins P. PC-PART: Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool user’s manual. Melbourne: PART Group; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Vertesi A, Darzins P, Lowe S, McEvoy E, Edwards M. Development of the Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool (HART). Can J Occup Ther 2000;67:120–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: ICIDH. Geneva: WHO; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Darzins P. Personal Communication about translation of HART to PC-PART. Melbourne; June 8, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2009; Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010;19:539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement INstruments. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM. COSMIN checklist manual. [Written document] 2009 [cited 2010 July 10]; Written manual]. Available at: http://www.cosmin.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M. Outcome measures rating form guidelines. 2004 [cited 2010 July 10]. Available at: http://canchild.ca/en/canchildresources/resources/measguid.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett AL. Principles of assessment and outcome measurement for occupational therapists and physiotherapists: theory, skills and application. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Letts L, Wilkins S, Law M, Stewart D, Bosch J, Westmorland M.Guidelines for critical review form: qualitative studies (version 2.0). Evidence Based Practice Research Group, School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University. 2007 [cited 2010 July 10]. Available at: http://srsmcmaster.ca/Portals/20/pdf/ebp/qualguidelines_version2.0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin M, Fossey E. Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists. Aust Occup Ther J 2007;54:88–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzins P, McEvoy E, Lowe S, Vertesi A, Brock C, Edwards M, Patterson C. Reliability and Validity of the Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool (HART). In: The Canadian Association on Gerontology (CAG) Conference. Quebec, Canada; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor J, Clarnette R, Darzins P. Reliability of the Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool (HART) in an aged care department. In: Australian Society for Geriatric Medicine Conference. Melbourne, Australia; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Turner C, Fricke J, Darzins P. Interrater reliability of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART) in a rehabilitation setting. Aust Occup Ther J 2009;56:132–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzins P, Bremner F, Smith R. Outcome measures in rehabilitation: Phase 2 Project. [Written report] 2002 [cited 2010 August 12]; 1-102]. Available at: http://www.health.vic.gov.au/subacute/outcomefinal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barbara A, Whiteford G. Clinical utility of the Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool: An investigation of its use with the aged people in hospital. Aust Occup Ther J 2005;52:17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Smith R, Darzins P, Steel C, Murray K, Osborne D, Gilsenan B. Outcome Measures in Rehabilitation Project Report. [Written Report] 2001 Jun 18 [cited 2010 August 12]; [1-156]. Available at: http://www.health.vic.gov.au/subacute/outcome_phase1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, King G, Russell D. Guiding therapist decisions about measuring outcomes in occupational therapy. In: Law M, Baum C, Dunn W, editors. Measuring occupational performance: supporting best practice in occupational therapy. Thorofare: SLACK Incorporated; 2005. pp 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, Ustün TB, Stucki G. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:205–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar