Problem-solving in physiotherapy – physiotherapists’ talk about encounters with patients with non-specific low back pain

References

• Deyo RA, Phillips WR. Low back pain. A primary care challenge. Spine 1996;21:2826–2832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent PM, Keating JL, Buchbinder R. Searching for a conceptual framework for nonspecific low back pain. Man Ther 2009;14:387–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephson I, Bülow P, Hedberg B. Physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning about patients with non-specific low back pain, as described by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:2217–2228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson D. “Problem” patients as experienced by senior physiotherapists in the context of their working lives. Adv Physiother 2000;2:2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Daykin AR, Richardson B. Physiotherapists’ pain beliefs and their influence on the management of patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 2004;29:783–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macneela P, Gibbons A, McGuire B, Murphy A. “We need to get you focused”: general practitioners’ representations of chronic low back pain patients. Qual Health Res 2010;20:977–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter M, Gordon S, Hamer P. The difficult patient in private practice physiotherapy: a qualitative study. Aust J Physiother 2003;49:53–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May CR, Rose MJ, Johnstone FC. Dealing with doubt. How patients account for non-specific chronic low back pain. J Psychosom Res 2000;49:223–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillrank A. Back pain and the resolution of diagnostic uncertainty in illness narratives. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:1045–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade SC, Molloy E, Keating JL. Stigma experienced by people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a qualitative study. Pain Med 2009;10:143–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway I, Sofaer-Bennett B, Walker J. The stigmatisation of people with chronic back pain. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1456–1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben RM, Gijsen A, Peterson J, de Jong PJ, Vlaeyen JW. Do health care providers’ attitudes towards back pain predict their treatment recommendations? Differential predictive validity of implicit and explicit attitude measures. Pain 2005;114:491–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones MA, Jensen G, Edwards I. Clinical reasoning in physiotherapy.. In: Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. London: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier; 2008. pp 245–256.
   Google Scholar
• Smith M, Higgs J, Ellis E. Factors influencing clinical decision making. 3rd ed. In: Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. London: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier; 2008. pp 89–100.
   Google Scholar
• Potter J. Discourse analysis as a way of analyzing naturally occurring talk.. In: Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. 2nd ed. London: Sage. 2004. pp 200–221.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995;311:299–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markova I, Linell P, Grossen M, Salazar Orvig A. Dialoguism: interaction, social knowledge and dialogue.. In: Markova I, Linell P, Grossen M, Salazar Orvig A, editors. Dialogue in focus groups, exploring socially shared knowledge. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd; 2007. pp 7–29.
   Google Scholar
• Riktlinjer för etisk värdering av medicinsk humanforskning. Forskningsetisk policy och organisation i Sverige. (Guidelines for Ethical Evaluation of Medical Research. Research ethics policy and organization in Sweden). Vetenskapsrådet. (The Swedish Research Council). Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell; 2003. pp 116.
   Google Scholar
• Potter J. Discourse analysis.. In: Hardy MA, Bryman A, editors. Handbook of Data analysis. London: Sage; 2004. pp 607–621.
   Google Scholar
• Potter J, Wetherell M. Discourse and social psychology. Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage; 1987. pp 216.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts C, Sarangi S. Theme-oriented discourse analysis of medical encounters. Med Educ 2005;39:632–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row; 1974. pp 586.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell; 1981. pp 335.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson ME, Nordholm LA. Responsibility for managing musculoskeletal disorders–a cross-sectional postal survey of attitudes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincus T, Woodcock A, Vogel S. Returning back pain patients to work: how private musculoskeletal practitioners outside the national health service perceive their role (an interview study). J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:322–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean SG, Smith JA, Payne S, Weinman J. Managing time: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of patients’ and physiotherapists’ perceptions of adherence to therapeutic exercise for low back pain. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:625–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low back pain: guidelines for its management. European Commission Research Directorate General. Hosted by UNIFOB Health, University of Bergen, Norway. Available at: www.backpaineurope.org. Accessed on: 04 December 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ont i ryggen, ont i nacken: En evidensbaserad kunskapssammanställning. SBU Rapport 145/1&2. (Back Pain, Neck Pain: An Evidence Based Review. Report no.145 1&2). Stockholm: Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care); 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Liddle SD, Baxter GD, Gracey JH. Chronic low back pain: patients’ experiences, opinions and expectations for clinical management. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1899–1909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeston S, Simons H. Physiotherapy practice: Practitioners’ perspectives. Physiother Theor Pract 1996;12:231–242.
   Google Scholar
• Payton OD, Nelson CE. A preliminary study of patients’ perceptions of certain aspects of their physical therapy experience. Physiother Theor Pract 1996;12:27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards I, Jones MA, Higgs J, Trede F, Jensen G. What is collaborative reasoning? Adv Physiother 2004;6:70–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hydén L-C, Bülow PH. Who’s talking: drawing conclusions from focus groups – some methodological considerations. Int J Soc Res Meth 2003;6:305–323.
   Google Scholar