Enhancing the conceptual clarity and utility of the international classification of functioning, disability & health: the potential of a new graphic representation

References

• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, Ustün TB. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:1173–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barile M. Globalization and the ICF eugenics: Historical coincidence or connection? The more things change the more they stay the same. Disabil Studies Q 2003; 23:208–223.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie R. Demystifying disability: a review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Sociol Health Illn 2004;26:287–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for? Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:596–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G. Conceptual models of disability: past, present, and future. In: Workshop on disability in America: A new look. Washington: National Academy of Sciences 2006; Appendix B, 50–66.
   Google Scholar
• Huber JG, Sillick J, Skarakis-Doyle E. Personal perception and personal factors: incorporating health-related quality of life into the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1955–1965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall J, Wright V, Rosenbaum P. The ICF model of functioning and disability: incorporating quality of life and human development. Dev Neurorehabil 2010;13:204–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyère SM, Van Looy SA, Peterson DB. The International classification of functioning, disability and health: contemporary literature overview. Rehabil Psychol 2005; 50:113–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelsma J. Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a literature survey. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerniauskaite M, Quintas R, Boldt C, Raggi A, Cieza A, Bickenbach JE, Leonardi M. Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2009: its use, implementation and operationalisation. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:281–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs E. Transcription as theory. In: Ochs E, Schieffelin BB, editors. Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press 1979; 43–72.
   Google Scholar
• Von Bertalanffy L. An outline of general systems theory. Br J Philos Sci 1950; 1:134–165.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss PA. The system of nature and the nature of systems: empirical holism and practical reductionism harmonized. In: Schaefer KE, Hensel H, Brady R, editors. Toward a man-centered medical science. New York: Futura Publishing Company 1977; 17–63.
   Google Scholar
• Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977;196:129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel GL. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry 1980;137:535–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zola IK. Toward the necessary universalizing of a disability policy. Milbank Q 1989;67 Suppl 2 Pt 2:401–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Stucki G. The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health: its development process and content validity. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2008;44:303–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Basic Documents: Forty-seventh Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization 2009 http://apps.who.int/gb/bd/.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHOQOL: measuring quality of life. Geneva: World Health Organization 1997 http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/68.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews JR. Theory and practice in speech-language pathology: a review of systemic principles. Semin Speech Lang 1996;17:97–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beckman JF, Fernandez CE, Coulter ID. A systems model of health care: a proposal. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1996;19:208–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gould SJ. The hedgehog, the fox, and the magister’s pox: mending the gap between science and the humanities. New York: Harmony Books 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd LJ. Lifting the veil: the feminine face of science. Boston: Shambhala Publications 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Suppes P. The plurality of science. Philos Sci Assoc 1978; 2:3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett DJ, Macnab J, Macarthur C, Mandich A, Magill-Evans J, Young NL, Beal D, et al. Advancing rehabilitation research: an interactionist perspective to guide question and design. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1169–1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rook KS, Charles ST, Heckhausen J. Aging and health. In: Friedman HS, Silver RC, editors. Foundations of health psychology. New York: Oxford University Press 2007; 234–262.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Cooper B, Strong S et al. The Person-Environment-Occupational Model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian J Occup Ther 1996; 63:9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Engel GL. From biomedical to biopsychosocial. Being scientific in the human domain. Psychosomatics 1997;38:521–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar