Self-management: a systematic review of outcome measures adopted in self-management interventions for stroke

References

• Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Barker-Collo SL, Parag V. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:355–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAO, National Audit Office. Reducing brain damage: faster access to better stroke care. London: Stationary Office, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Ellis-Hill C, Payne S, Ward C. Using stroke to explore the life thread model: an alternative approach to understanding rehabilitation following an acquired disability. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:150–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan NF, O’Regan M, Cunningham CJ, Finn AM. Recovery after stroke: a 1-year profile. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:831–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKevitt C, Redfern J, Mold F, Wolfe C. Qualitative studies of stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2004;35:1499–1505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young J, Murray J, Forster A. Review of longer-term problems after disabling stroke. Rev Clin Gerontol 2003;13:55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Ch’ng A, French D, McLean N. Coping with the challenges of recovery from stroke: long term perspectives of stroke support group members. J Health Psychol 2008;13:1136–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee D, Levin RL, Heller W. The cognitive, emotional, and social sequelae of stroke: psychological and ethical concerns in post-stroke adaptation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006;13:26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowswell G, Lawler J, Dowswell T, Young J, Forster A, Hearn J. Investigating recovery from stroke: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs 2000;9:507–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis-Hill CS, Payne S, Ward C. Self-body split: issues of identity in physical recovery following a stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22:725–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhook P. The domains of stroke recovery: a synopsis of the literature. J Neurosci Nurs 2009;41:6–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Ridder D, Geenen R, Kuijer R, van Middendorp H. Psychological adjustment to chronic disease. Lancet 2008;372:246–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battersby M, Lawn S, Pols R. Conceptualisation of self-management. In: Kralik D, Paterson B, Coates V (eds). Translating chronic illness research into practice. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kralik D, Koch T, Price K, Howard N. Chronic illness self-management: taking action to create order. J Clin Nurs 2004;13:259–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoH. White paper ‘Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS’. Health, Do. (ed). London: Department of Health, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• DoH. White paper. healthy lives, healthy people: our strategy for public health in England. London: The Stationary Office, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• DoH. The health and social care bill. Health, Do. (ed). London: Department of Health, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Imison C. et al. Transforming our health care system: Top ten priorities for commissioners. London: The King’s Fund, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Foundation H. Evidence: helping people help themselves. A review of the evidence considering whether it is worthwhile to support self-management. London: The Health Foundation, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lorig KR, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med 2003;26:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 2002;288:2469–2475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow RE, Funnell MM, Bonomi AE, Davis C, Beckham V, Wagner EH. Self-management aspects of the improving chronic illness care breakthrough series: implementation with diabetes and heart failure teams. Ann Behav Med 2002;24:80–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers A, Bury M, Kennedy A. Rationality, rhetoric, and religiosity in health care: the case of England’s Expert Patients Programme. Int J Health Serv 2009;39:725–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson-Smith G. Self-efficacy and quality of life after stroke. J Neuroscience Nursing 2002;34:91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Western H. Altered living: coping, hope and quality of life after stroke. Br J Nurs 2007;16:1266–1270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Du S, Yuan C. Evaluation of patient self-management outcomes in health care: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev 2010;57:159–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MRC. A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Medical Research Council, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW Jr, Bandura A, Ritter P, Gonzalez VM, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care 1999;37:5–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Fishbein M. The influence of attitude on behaviour. In: The Handbook of Attidues. Albarracín D, Johnson B, Zanna M (eds.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ltd., 2005, 173–221.
   Google Scholar
• Hardeman W et al. Application of the theory of planned behaviour in behaviour change interventions: a systematic review. Psychology & Health 2002;17:123–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsche RC, Williams B, Jones A, Manns P. Chronic disease self-management for individuals with stroke, multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1136–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio RH, Olson MA. Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. Annu Rev Psychol 2003;54:297–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim A. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. 2nd edn., 2000, London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, Burnam MA, Patrick DL, Perrin EB, Roberts JS. Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther 1996;18:979–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valderas JM, Ferrer M, Mendívil J, Garin O, Rajmil L, Herdman M, Alonso J; Scientific Committee on “Patient-Reported Outcomes” of the IRYSS Network. Development of EMPRO: a tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures. Value Health 2008;11:700–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Riphagen I, Knol DL, et al. Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Qual Life Res 2009;18:313–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010;19:539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Gibbons E, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Knol DL, et al. Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbers RG, Rietberg MB, van Wegen EE, Verhoef J, Kramer SF, Terwee CB, Kwakkel G. Self-report fatigue questionnaires in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and stroke: a systematic review of measurement properties. Qual Life Res 2012;21:925–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellingerhout JM, Heymans MW, Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, Koes BW, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of translated versions of neck-specific questionnaires: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit S, Lamping D, Maclaine G. Measuring health-related quality of life in diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Practice, 2012;96:261–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 2012;21:651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis R. Scale development. Theory and applications. Bickman L, Rog D (eds.). Applied social research methods series. Vol. 26. 2nd edn., 2003, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden D, Quinn R, Pond N, Golledge R, Neilson C, White J, McElduff P, Pollack M. A multidisciplinary group programme in rural settings for community-dwelling chronic stroke survivors and their carers: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:328–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Mandy A, Partridge C. Changing self-efficacy in individuals following a first time stroke: preliminary study of a novel self-management intervention. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:522–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackley C, Wade DT, Mant D, Atkinson JC, Yudkin P, Cardoso K, Levin S, et al. Cluster randomized pilot controlled trial of an occupational therapy intervention for residents with stroke in UK care homes. Stroke 2006;37:2336–2341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadilhac DA, Hoffmann S, Kilkenny M, Lindley R, Lalor E, Osborne RH, Batterbsy M. A phase II multicentered, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of the stroke self-management program. Stroke 2011;42:1673–1679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen K, et al. Improving stroke outcomes: implementation of a postdischarge care management model. J Clin Outcomes Manag 2004;11:707–714.
   Google Scholar
• Frank G, et al. Perceived control and recovery from functional limitations: Preliminary evaluation of a workbook-based intervention for discharged stroke patients. British J Health Psychol 2000;5:413–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M, Bonetti D, Joice S, Pollard B, Morrison V, Francis JJ, Macwalter R. Recovery from disability after stroke as a target for a behavioural intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1117–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljungberg C, Hanson E, Lovgren M. A home rehabilitation program for stroke patients: a pilot study. Scandinavian J Caring Sciences 2001;15:44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sit JW, Yip VY, Ko SK, Gun AP, Lee JS. A quasi-experimental study on a community-based stroke prevention programme for clients with minor stroke. J Clin Nurs 2007;16:272–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau JP, Thompson DR, Twinn S, Chang AM, Woo J. Determinants of participation restriction among community dwelling stroke survivors: a path analysis. BMC Neurol 2009;9:49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena SK, Ng TP, Koh G, Yong D, Fong NP. Is improvement in impaired cognition and depressive symptoms in post-stroke patients associated with recovery in activities of daily living? Acta Neurol Scand 2007;115:339–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte EM, Mulsant BH, Vanderbilt J, Dodge HH, Ganguli M. Depression after stroke: a prospective epidemiological study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:774–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn T, Langhorne P, Stott D. Barthel index for stroke trials: development, properties, and application. Stroke 2011;42:1146–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott C, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1566–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerant A, von Friederichs-Fitzwater M, Moore M. Patients’ percieved barriers to active self-management of chronic conditions. Patient Education and Counseling 2005;57:300–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. The nature and structure of self-efficacy. In: Bandura A (ed). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, New York: WH Freeman and Company, 1997, pp 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P, Lee V, Middleton E, Richardson G, Gardner C, et al. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:254–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling A. What things are important in people’s lives? A survey of the public’s judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1447–1462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bury M, Newbould J, Taylor D. A rapid review of the current state of knowledge regarding lay-led self-management of chronic illness. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt D, King D, King L. Focus groups in psychological assessment: enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population. Psychol Assess, 2004;16:231–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd edn, New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Switzer GE, Wisniewski SR, Belle SH, Dew MA, Schultz R. Selecting, developing, and evaluating research instruments. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999;34:399–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis GL, Moore C, Armstrong SM. Breaking away from dopamine deficiency: an essential new direction for Parkinson’s disease. Rev Neurosci 2012;23:403–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck SL, Towsley GL, Berry PH, Brant JM, Smith EM. Measuring the quality of care related to pain management: a multiple-method approach to instrument development. Nurs Res 2010;59:85–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosal M, Carbone E, Goins K. Use of cognitive interviewing to adapt measurement instruments for low-literate Hispanics. Diabetes Educ 2003;29:1006–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall M, Lockwood A, Bradley C, Adams C, Joy C, Fenton M. Unpublished rating scales: a major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 2000;176:249–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raykov T, Marcoulides GA. Introduction to psychometric theory. Taylor & Francis, New York, USA, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R, et al. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998;2:1–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Donnell AB, Lutfey KE, Marceau LD, McKinlay JB. Using focus groups to improve the validity of cross-national survey research: a study of physician decision making. Qual Health Res 2007;17:971–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, Wright JG. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:1204–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang MH, Lew RA, Stucki G, Fortin PR, Daltroy L. Measuring clinically important changes with patient-oriented questionnaires. Med Care 2002;40:II45–II51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall E, Catalano T, Kuipers P, Posner N, Buys N, Charker J. Recovery following stroke: the role of self-management education. Soc Sci Med 2007;64:735–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Soc Sci Med 2005;60:833–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzi A. Our NHS our future: High quality care for all in NHS next stage review final report. London: Department of Health, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkinson C, Gibbons E, Fitzpatrick R. A structured review of patient-reported outcome measures in relation to stroke. Oxford: Department of Public Health University of Oxford: P.-r.O.M. Group, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000;321:694–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redfern J, McKevitt C, Wolfe CD. Development of complex interventions in stroke care: a systematic review. Stroke 2006;37:2410–2419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warsi A, Wang PS, LaValley MP, Avorn J, Solomon DH. Self-management education programs in chronic disease: a systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1641–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasch KE, Marquis P, Vigneux M, Abetz L, Arnould B, Bayliss M, Crawford B, Rosa K. PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation. Qual Life Res 2010;19:1087–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakeman T, Bower P, Reeves D, Chew-Graham C. Bringing self-management into clinical view: a qualitative study of long-term condition management in primary care consultations. Chronic Illn 2010;6:136–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bury M, Pink D. The HSJ debate. Self-management of chronic disease doesn’t work. Health Serv J 2005;115:18–9, 1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones F, Riazi A. Self-efficacy and self-management after stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:797–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano SJ, Hobart JC. The problem with health measurement. Patient Prefer Adherence 2011;5:279–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner E. Care of older people with chronic illness. In: Calkins E et al. (eds). New ways to care for older people: building systems based on evidence. Springer: New York, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr 1966;80:1–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviours: Theoretical approaches and a new model. In: Schwarzer R (ed). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Hemisphere: London, 1992, pp. 217–243.
   Google Scholar
• Guidetti S, Ytterberg C. A randomised controlled trial of a client-centred self-care intervention after stroke: a longitudinal pilot study. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:494–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijbregts MP, Myers AM, Streiner D, Teasell R. Implementation, process, and preliminary outcome evaluation of two community programs for persons with stroke and their care partners. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008;15:503–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijbregts M, McEwen S, Taylor D. Exploring the Feasibility and Efficacy of a Telehealth Stroke Self-Management Programme: A Pilot Study. Physiotherapy Canada 2009;61:210–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orem D. Nursing: concepts of practice. St Louis, USA: Mosby, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Carr J, Sheppard R. A motor relearning programme for stroke. 2nd edn. London: Heinemann, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995;50A:M28–M34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botner E, Miller W, Eng J. Measurement properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale among individuals with stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:156–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R. The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1999;8:209–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm JW, Osborne RH, Dewey HM, Donnan GA, Macdonell RA, Thrift AG. Brief comprehensive quality of life assessment after stroke: the assessment of quality of life instrument in the north East melbourne stroke incidence study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2002;33:2888–2894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green J, Forster A, Young J. A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 2001;23:670–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob-Lloyd H. et al., Effective measurement of the functional progress of stroke clients. British J Occupat Ther 2005;68:253–259.
   Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Wang CH, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. Comparison of psychometric properties of three mobility measures for patients with stroke. Stroke 2003;34:1741–1745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Samsa GP, Weinberger M, Goldstein LB, Bonito A, Witter DM, Enarson C, Matchar D. Health status of individuals with mild stroke. Stroke 1997;28:740–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hartingsveld F, Lucas C, Kwakkel G, Lindeboom R. Improved interpretation of stroke trial results using empirical Barthel item weights. Stroke 2006;37:162–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:61–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsueh I, Lee M, Hsieh C. Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc 2001;100:526–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada 1989;41:304–311.
   Google Scholar
• Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 1992;83 Suppl 2:S7–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 1995;27:27–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• English CK, Hillier SL, Stiller K, Warden-Flood A. The sensitivity of three commonly used outcome measures to detect change amongst patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation following stroke. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:52–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson TJ. Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale. Aust J Physiother 2001;47:29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Hanley JA, Richards CL, Wood-Dauphinee S. Psychometric evaluation of the original and Canadian French version of the activities-specific balance confidence scale among people with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1597–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radloff L. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1:385–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrell B, Dehlin O. Comparison of six depression rating scales in geriatric stroke patients. Stroke 1989;20:1190–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinar D, Gross CR, Price TR, Banko M, Bolduc PL, Robinson RG. Screening for depression in stroke patients: the reliability and validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Stroke 1986;17:241–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Park EY. Rasch analysis of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale used for the assessment of community-residing patients with stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:2075–2083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde B. Quality of care: models, instruments and empirical results among elderly. In: Department of Geriatric Medicine. University of Gothernburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, Van Hullenaar S, Sanford J, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993;24:58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijbregts M, Gowland C, Gruber R. Measuring clinically important change with the Activity Inventory of the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Physiotherapy Canada, 2000;52:295–304.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1983;12:166–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D, Legh-Smith J, Langton Hewer R. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med 1985;7:176–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piercy M, Carter J, Mant J, Wade DT. Inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay activities index in patients with stroke and their careers. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:433–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepers VP, Ketelaar M, Visser-Meily JM, Dekker J, Lindeman E. Responsiveness of functional health status measures frequently used in stroke research. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1035–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen PM, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:161–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuling J, de Haan R, Limburg M, Groenier KH. The Frenchay Activities Index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke 1993;24:1173–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Lin JH, Jeng JS, Hsieh CL. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2002;73:188–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:531–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh SJ, Hogan K, Gordon V, Fairfax J. Stroke-specific FIM models in an urban population. J Neurosci Nurs 2000;32:17–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daving Y, Andrén E, Nordholm L, Grimby G. Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:301–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal ME, Schall RR. Determining functional/health status and its relation to disability in stroke survivors. Stroke 1994;25:2391–2397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock K, Goldie P, Greenwood K. Evaluating the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation: choosing a discriminative measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:92–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1226–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh, J, Yesavage J. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontologist, 1986;5:165–172.
   Google Scholar
• Wancata J, Alexandrowicz R, Marquart B, Weiss M, Friedrich F. The criterion validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale: a systematic review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2006;114:398–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aben I, Verhey F, Lousberg R, Lodder J, Honig A. Validity of the beck depression inventory, hospital anxiety and depression scale, SCL-90, and hamilton depression rating scale as screening instruments for depression in stroke patients. Psychosomatics 2002;43:386–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M, Pollard B, Hennessey P. Construct validation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale with clinical populations. J Psychosom Res 2000;48:579–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon S, Johnson L. The modified rivermead mobility index: validity and reliability. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22:833–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L, Selfe J. Measurement of mobility following stroke: a comparison of the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index and the Motor Assessment Scale. Physiotherapy, 2004;90:132–138.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh C, Hsueh I, Mao M. Validity and responsiveness of the Rivermead Mobility Index in stroke patients. Scand J Rehab Med, 2000;32:140–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Partridge C, Johnston M. Perceived control of recovery from physical disability: measurement and prediction. Br J Clin Psychol 1989;28 (Pt 1):53–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M et al., Perceived control, coping and recovery from disability following stroke. Psychology & Health, 1999;14:181–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Dauphinee SL, Opzoomer MA, Williams JI, Marchand B, Spitzer WO. Assessment of global function: The Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneski K, Coshall C, Tilling K, Wolfe CD. Reliability and validity of a postal version of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index, modified for use with stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:835–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark SL, Edwards DF, Hollingsworth H, Gray DB. Validation of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index in a population of community-dwelling people with mobility limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:344–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting, S, Lincoln N. An ADL assessment for stroke patients. British J Occup Ther 1980;43:44–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln NB, Edmans JA. A re-validation of the Rivermead ADL scale for elderly patients with stroke. Age Ageing 1990;19:19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri, F, Lincoln N. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1987;1:301–305.
   Google Scholar
• Rossier P, Wade DT, Murphy M. An initial investigation of the reliability of the Rivermead Extended ADL index in patients presenting with neurological impairment. J Rehabil Med 2001;33:61–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Straten A, de Haan RJ, Limburg M, Schuling J, Bossuyt PM, van den Bos GA. A stroke-adapted 30-item version of the Sickness Impact Profile to assess quality of life (SA-SIP30). Stroke 1997;28:2155–2161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Port I et al., Monitoring the functional health status of stroke patients: the value of the Stroke-Adapted Sickness Impact Profile-30. Disability & Rehabilitation, 2004;26:635–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Straten A, de Haan RJ, Limburg M, van den Bos GA. Clinical meaning of the Stroke-Adapted Sickness Impact Profile-30 and the Sickness Impact Profile-136. Stroke 2000;31:2610–2615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999;30:2131–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S; Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection Americans Investigators. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:950–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Fu T, Wu CY, Wang YH, Liu JS, Hsieh CJ, Lin SF. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24:486–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigg R, Wood VA. The Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO): a new measure for use with stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:288–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigg R, Wood VA. The validation of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO). Clin Rehabil 2003;17:283–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten P, Ashburn A, George S, Low J. The subjective index for physical and social outcome (SIPSO) in stroke: investigation of its subscale structure. BMC Neurol 2010;10:26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Partridge C, Reid F. The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: measuring individual confidence in functional performance after stroke. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:244–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke 1999;30:1362–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Biller J. Measuring quality of life in a way that is meaningful to stroke patients. Neurology 1999;53:1839–1843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar