References
- Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:64–7
- Ashford S, Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment for spasticity management using botulinum toxin. Physiother Res Int 2006;11:24–34
- Sheean GL. Botulinum treatment of spasticity: why is it difficult to show a functional benefit? Curr Opin Neurol 2001;14:771–6
- Shaw L, Rodgers H, Price C, et al. BoTULS: a multicentre randomised-controlled trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin A. Health Technol Assess 2010;14:iii–iv
- Ashford S, Slade M, Malaprade F, et al. Evaluation of functional outcome measures for the hemiparetic upper limb: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:787–95
- Bhakta BB, Cozens J, Chamberlain M, et al. Impact of botulinum toxin type A on disability and carer burden due to arm spasticity after stroke: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:217–21
- Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, et al. The Motor Activity Log-28 assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 2006;67:1189–94
- Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, et al. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real world arm use. Stroke 2005;36:2493–6
- van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, et al. Clinimetric properties of the Motor Activity Log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 2004;35:1–5
- Penta M, Tesio L, Arnould C, et al. The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients – Rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke 2001;32:1627–34
- Penta M, Thonnard J-L, Tesio L. ABILHAND: a Rasch-built measure of manual ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1038–42
- Burns SP, Rivara FP, Johansen JM, et al. Rehabilitation of traumatic injuries: use of the Delphi method to identify topics for evidence-based review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:410–14
- Finger M, Cieza A, Stoll J, et al. Identification of intervention categories for physical therapy, based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a Delphi exercise. Phys Ther 2006;86:1203–20
- Reid N. The Delphi technique: its contribution to the evaluation of professional practice. In: Ellis R, ed. Professional competence and quality assurance in the caring professions. London: Chapman Hall; 1988:230–63
- Raine S. Defining the Bobath concept using the Delphi technique. Physiother Res Int 2006;11:4–11
- Massof RW. Application of stochastic measurement models to visual function rating scale questionnaires. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2005;12:103–24
- Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Meas Trans 1994;7:328
- Martin M, Liu H, Spritze K, et al. Item response theory methods can improve the measurement of physical function by combining the modified health assessment questionnaire and the SF-36 physical function scale. Qual Life Res 2007;16:647–60
- Wismeijer AAJ, Sijtsma K, van Assen MA, et al. A comparative study of the dimensionality of the self-concealment scale using principal component analysis and Mokken scale analysis. J Pers Assess 2008;90:323–34
- Deane KHO, Ellis-Hill C, Dekker K, et al. A Delphi survey of best practice occupational therapy for Parkinson’s disease in the United Kingdom. Br J Occup Ther 2003;66:247–54