Conceptualizing participation in context for children and youth with disabilities: an activity setting perspective

References

• World Health Organization. ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Rehabilitation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Eccles JS. The present and future of research on activity settings as developmental contexts. In: Mahoney JL, Larson RW, Eccles JS, eds. Organized activities as contexts of development: extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:353–71
   Google Scholar
• Rivera HH, Tharp RG, Youpa D, et al. Activity setting observation system rule book. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California at Santa Cruz; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Heft H, Chawla L. Children as agents in sustainable development: the ecology of competence. In: Spencer C, Blades M, eds. Children and their environments: learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006:199–216
   Google Scholar
• Spencer C, Blades M, eds. Children and their environments: learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Clark C, Uzzell DL. The affordances of the home, neighborhood, school and town centre for adolescents. J Educ Psychol 2002;22:95–108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horelli L. Environmental human-friendliness as a contextual determinant for quality of life. Rev Eur Psychol Appl 2006;56:15–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla L. Toward better cities for children and youth. In: Chawla L, ed. Growing up in an urbanising world. London: Earthscan; 2002:219–42
   Google Scholar
• Palisano RJ, Chiarello LA, King GA, et al. Participation-based therapy for children with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2011;34:1041–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimerson SR, Campos E, Greif JL. Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. Calif Sch Psychol 2003;8:7–27
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res 2004;74:59–109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Currie M, Petersen P. Child and parent engagement in the mental health intervention process: a motivational framework. Child Adolesc Mental Health 2012
   Google Scholar
• Almqvist L. Patterns of engagement in young children with and without developmental delay. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil 2006;3:65–75
   Google Scholar
• Bohnert A, Fredricks J, Randall E. Capturing unique dimensions of youth organized activity involvement. Rev Educ Res 2010;80:576–610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shernoff DJ, Vandell DL. Engagement in after-school program activities: quality of experience from the perspective of participants. J Youth Adolesc 2007;36:891–903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M, Rathunde K. The measurement of flow in everyday life: toward a theory of emergent motivation. In: Jacobs JE, ed. Developmental perspectives on motivation: volume 40 of the Nebraska Symposium on motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press; 1993:57–97
   Google Scholar
• Raab M. Interest-based child participation in everyday learning activities. CASEinPoint 2005;1:1–5
   Google Scholar
• Petrenchik TM, King GA. Pathways to positive development: childhood participation in everyday places and activities. In: Bazyk S, ed. Mental health promotion, prevention, and intervention in children and youth: a guiding framework for occupational therapy. Bethesda, MD: The American Occupational Therapy Association; 2011:71–94
   Google Scholar
• Gallimore R, Goldenberg CN, Weisner TS. The social construction and subjective reality of activity settings: implications for community psychology. Am J Community Psychol 1993;21:537–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swindle R, Moos R. Life domains in stressors, coping, and adjustment. In: Walsh WB, Craik K, Price R, eds. Person-environment psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1992:1–34
   Google Scholar
• Polatajko HJ, Davis J, Stewart S, et al. Specifying the domain of concern: occupation as core. In: Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ, eds. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2007:13–36
   Google Scholar
• Rigby P, Trentham B, Letts L. Modifying performance context. In: Schell B, Gillen G, Scaffa M, eds. Willard & Spackman’s occupational therapy. 12th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; in press
   Google Scholar
• Mallinson T, Hammel J. Measurement of participation: intersecting person, task, and environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S29–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noreau L, Boschen K. Intersection of participation and environmental factors: a complex interactive process. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S44–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandell DL, Shernoff DJ, Pierce KM, et al. Activities, engagement, and emotion in after-school programs (and elsewhere). New Dir Youth Dev 2005;105:121–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rueda R, Gallego MA, Moll LC. The least restrictive environment. Remedial Special Educ 2000;21:70–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunst CJ, Bruder MB, Trivette CM, et al. Everyday activity settings, natural learning environments, and early intervention practices. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil 2006;3:3–10
   Google Scholar
• Almqvist L, Uys CJE, Sandberg J. The concepts of participation, engagement and flow: a matter of creating optimal play experiences. S Afr J Occup Ther 2007;37:8–13
   Google Scholar
• Trickett EJ. Community psychology: individuals and interventions in community context. Annu Rev Psychol 2009;60:395–419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounin JS, Sherman LW. School environments as behavior settings. Theory Pract 1979;18:145–51
   Google Scholar
• Lerner RM, Benson PI, eds. Developmental assets and asset-building communities. New York: Kluwer Academic; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Dunst CJ, Trivette CM, Humphries T, et al. Contrasting approaches to natural learning environment interventions. Infants Young Children 2001;14:48–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell CR, Tharp RG, Wilson K. Activity settings as the unit of analysis: a theoretical basis for community intervention and development. Am J Community Psychol 1993;21:501–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner U. Making human beings human: bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Endler NS, Magnusson D. Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychol Bull 1976;83:956–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker RG. Ecological psychology: concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1968
   Google Scholar
• Horelli L. Constructing a theoretical framework for environmental child-friendliness. Children Youth Environ 2007;17:267–92
   Google Scholar
• Dunn W, Brown C, McGuigan A. The ecology of human performance: a framework for considering the effect of context. Am J Occup Ther 1994;48:595–607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell CR. Environmental design and the prevention of psychological problems. In: Feldman MR, Orford J, eds. Psychological problems: the social context. New York: Wiley; 1980:279–309
   Google Scholar
• Childress DC. Special instruction and natural environments: best practices in early intervention. Infants Young Children 2004;17:162–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphry R. Young children’s occupations: explicating the dynamics of developmental processes. Am J Occup Ther 2002;56:171–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal R, Hinojosa J. The activity setting of homework: an analysis of three cases and implications for occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther 2006;60:50–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell CR, Tharp RG. Community intervention guided by theoretical development. In: Bellack AS, Hersen M, Kazdin AE, eds. International handbook of behavior modification and therapy. 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press; 1990:251–66
   Google Scholar
• Riger S. Transforming community psychology. Am J Community Psychol 2001;29:69–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison CM, Hawe P. School engagement among Aboriginal students in Northern Canada: perspectives from activity settings theory. J Sch Health 2012;82:65–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duerden MD, Taniguchi S, Widmer M. Antecedents of identity development in a structured recreation setting: a qualitative inquiry. J Adolesc Res 2012;2:183–202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartko WT, Eccles JS. Adolescent participation in structured and unstructured activities: a person-oriented analysis. J Youth Adolesc 2003;32:233–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escorpizo R, Graf S, Marti A, et al. Domain sets and measurement instruments on participation and environmental factors in spinal cord injury research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011;90:S66–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coster W, Khetani MA. Measuring participation of children with disabilities: issues and challenges. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:639–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselkus BR. The meaning of everyday occupation. Thorofare: Slack Incorporated; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Henry AD. Development of a measure of adolescent leisure interests. Am J Occup Ther 1998;52:531–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan D, Ramey S, Ramey C, et al. Modeling intraindividual changes in children’s social skills at home and at school: a multivariate latent growth approach to understanding between-settings differences in children’s social skill development. Multivariate Behav Res 2000;35:365–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor AF, Kuo FE. Is contact with nature important for healthy child development? State of the evidence. In: Spencer C, Blades M, eds. Children and their environments: learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006:124–40
   Google Scholar
• Harding J, Harding K, Jamieson P, et al. Children with disabilities’ perceptions of activity participation and environments: a pilot study. Can J Occup Ther 2009;76:133–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedell GM, Khetani MA, Cousins MA, et al. Parent perspectives to inform development of measures of children’s participation and environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:765–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth R, Jarvis S. Participation in childhood. Child Care Health Dev 2002;28:277–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConachie H, Colver AF, Forsyth RJ, et al. Participation of disabled children: how should it be characterised and measured? Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1157–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Rigby P, Batorowicz B, et al. Development of a direct observation Measure of Environmental Qualities of Activity Settings (MEQAS). 2012
   Google Scholar
• King G, Batorowicz B, Rigby P, et al. Development of a measure to assess youth Self-reported Experiences of Activity Settings (SEAS). 2012
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt JD, Miller J, Stucki G, et al. Measuring impact of environmental factors on human functioning and disability: a review of various scientific approaches. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:2151–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:S22–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin SH. The classroom environment and children’s performance-is there a relationship? In: Spencer C, Blades M, eds. Children and their environments: learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006:91–107
   Google Scholar
• Kytta M. Environmental child-friendliness in the light of the Bullerby model. In: Spencer C, Blades M, eds. Children and their environments: learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006:141–58
   Google Scholar
• Harvey OJ, Hunt DE, Schroder HM. Situational and dispositional determinants: their measurement and effect. In: Harvey OJ, Hunt DE, Schroder HM, eds. Conceptual systems and personality organization. New York: Wiley; 1961:244–71
   Google Scholar
• Clark C, Uzzell DL. The socio-environmental affordances of adolescents’ environments. In: Spencer C, Blades M, eds. Children and their environments: learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006:176–95
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg D, Ding D, Sallis JF, et al. Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale for Youth (NEWS-Y): reliability and relationship with physical activity. Prev Med 2009;49:213–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway S, Valentine G, eds. Children’s geographies: playing, living, learning. London: Routledge; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Luke D. Getting the big picture in community science: methods that capture context. Am J Community Psychol 2005;35:185–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saary MJ. Radar plots: a useful way for presenting multivariate health care data. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:311–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Petrenchik T, DeWit D, et al. Out-of-school time activity participation profiles of children with physical disabilities: a cluster analysis. Child Care Health Dev 2010;36:726–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar