A systematic review on how to conduct evaluations in community-based rehabilitation

References

• WHO and World Bank. World report on disability. Geneva: WHO Press; 2011
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), International Labour Organization (ILO), International Disability and Development Consortium (IDDC). [Internet]. Community-based rehabilitation: CBR Guidelines. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/cbr/en/ [last accessed 12 Apr 2013]
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), World Health Organization (WHO). [Internet] Joint position paper. CBR: a strategy for rehabilitation, equalization of opportunities, poverty reduction and social inclusion of people with disabilities. Geneva: WHO Press; 2004. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/cbr/en/ [last accessed 12 Apr 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Finkenflugel H, Wolffers I, Huijsman R. The evidence base for community-based rehabilitation: a literature review. Int J Rehabil Res 2005;28:187–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce W, Ballantyne S. Developing CBR through evaluation. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2000;2:69–83
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers P, Harknett S. Guest editorial. Considerations in the quest for evidence in community based rehabilitation. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2008;19:3–14
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell R. The research base of community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:459–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) [Internet]. Qualitative research: appraisal tool. 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research. Oxford: Public Health Resource Unit, 2006:1–4. Available from: http://www.casp-uk.net [last accessed 12 Apr 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Shea B, Grimshaw AM, Wells GA. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elm EV, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61: 344–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwers M, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. Can Med Assoc J 2010;51:421–4
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR 1999;48:1–40
   Google Scholar
• Cornielje H, Velema JP, Finkenflügel H. Community based rehabilitation programmes: monitoring and evaluation in order to measure results. Leprosy Rev 2008;79:36–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price P, Kuipers P. CBR action research: current status and future trends. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2000;2:55–68
   Google Scholar
• Thomas M. Reflections on community-based rehabilitation. Psychol Dev Soc 2011;23:277–91
   Google Scholar
• Velema J, Finkenflugel H, Cornielje H. Gains and losses of structured information collection in the evaluation of ‘rehabilitation in the community’ programmes: ten lessons learnt during actual evaluations. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:396–404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO and IDC [Internet]. Guidelines for conducting, monitoring and self-assessment of community-based rehabilitation programmes: using evaluation information to improve programmes Geneva: WHO Press; 1996. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/cbr/en/ [last accessed 12 Apr 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Zhao T, Kwok J. Evaluating community based rehabilitation: guidelines for accountable practice. 1999. Available from: http://unipd-centrodirittiumani.it/public/docs/34011_planning.pdf [last accessed 12 Apr 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Adeoye A, Seeley J, Hartley S. Developing a tool for evaluating community-based rehabilitation in Uganda. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1110–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung EY, Packer TL, Yau M. A framework for evaluating community-based rehabilitation programmes in Chinese communities. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1668–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornielje H, Nicholls P, Velema J. Making sense of rehabilitation projects: classification by objectives. Leprosy Rev 2000;71:472--85
   Google Scholar
• Evans PJ, Zinkin P, Harpham T, et al. Evaluation of medical rehabilitation in community based rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med 2001;53:333–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannan H, Turnbull AP. A review of community based rehabilitation evaluations: quality of life as an outcome measure for future evaluations. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2007;18:29–45
   Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Paterson J. A descriptive framework for community-based rehabilitation. Can J Rehabil 1997;10:297–306
   Google Scholar
• Pal DK, Chaudhury G. Preliminary validation of a parental adjustment measure for use with families of disabled children in rural india. Child: Care Health Dev 1998;24:315–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M. Evaluation in community based rehabilitation programmes: a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2007;18:46–62
   Google Scholar
• Wirz S, Thomas M. Evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes: a search for appropriate indicators. Int J Rehabil Res 2002;25:163–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkenflugel H, Cornielje H, Velema J. The use of classification models in the evaluation of CBR programmes. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:348–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M. Viable methods for evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:326–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M. Using focus groups in community based rehabilitation. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2005;16:41–50
   Google Scholar
• Fetterman DM, Wandersman A, eds. Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Evaluation: a systematic approach. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2004
   Google Scholar