Using intermittent self-catheters: experiences of people with neurological damage to their spinal cord

References

• The National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. Birmingham (AL): The National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Spinal Injuries Association (Internet). Milton Keynes, United Kingdom, 2013. Available from: http://www.spinal.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• NHS Clinical Advisory Group. Management of people with spinal cord injury. England: National Spinal Cord Injury Strategy Board; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Multiple Sclerosis Society (Internet). London, United Kingdom 2013. Available from: http://www.mssociety.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Fulford S, Coggrave M, Wright L. Bladder and bowel management for people with spinal cord injuries. Milton Keynes: Spinal Injuries Association; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Bloemen-Vrencken JHA, Post MWM, Hendriks JMS, et al. Health problems of persons with spinal cord injury living in the Netherlands. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1381–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan F, Pallant JF, Shea TL, Whishaw M. Multiple sclerosis: prevalence and factors impacting bladder and bowel function in an Australian community cohort. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1567–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalley Hammell KR. Perspectives in rehabilitation. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation research: patient priorities, current deficiencies and potential directions. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1209–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron AP, Wallner LP, Forchheimer MB, et al. Medical and psychosocial complications associated with method of bladder management after traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:449–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardenas DD, Hooton TM. Urinary tract infection in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:272–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman DK, Willson MM. Review of intermittent catheterization and current best practices. [Review] Urol Nurs 2011;31:12–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Logan K, Shaw C, Webber I, et al. Patients’ experiences of learning clean intermittent self-catheterization: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs 2007;62:32–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramm D, Kane R. A qualitative study exploring the emotional responses of female patients learning to perform clean intermittent self-catheterisation. J Clin Nurs 2011;20:3152–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward S, Rew M. Patients’ quality of life and clean intermittent self-catheterization. Br J Nurs 2003;12:1066–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodbury MG, Hayes KC, Askes HK. Intermittent catheterisation practices following spinal cord injury: a national survey. Can J Urol 2008;15:4065–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartier-Kastler E, Denys P. Intermittent catheterization with hydrophilic catheters as a treatment of chronic neurogenic urinary retention [Review]. Neurourol Urodyn 2011;30:21–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindig DA, Booske BC, Remington PL. Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health (MATCH): metrics, incentives, and partnerships for population health. Prevent Chron Dis 2010;7:A68. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2010/jul/10_0019.htm [last accessed 7 January 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36 health survey in Medicare managed care. Health Care Fin Rev 2004;25:5–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney C. Health status assessment methods for adults: past accomplishments and future directions. Annu Rev Publ Health 1999;20:309–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:622–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominick KL, Ahern FM, Gold CH, Heller DA. Relationship of health-related quality of life to health care utilization and mortality among older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 2002;14:499–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascoe G, Clovis S. Evaluation of two coated catheters in intermittent self-catheterization. Br J Nurs 2001;10:325–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koenen JH, Hoogendoorn P, eds. User evaluation of SpeediCath, the ready to use catheter. International Continence Society Annual Meeting; 2002 Aug 28–30; Heidelberg. Available from: http://www.icsoffice.org/
   Google Scholar
• Koenen JH, Van Kuppevelt D, eds. Comparative randomised cross-over evaluation of a modern catheter SpeediCath® with conventional catheters LoFric® and EasiCath®. International Continence Society Annual Meeting; 2005 28 Aug–2 Sept; Montreal. Available from: http://www.icsoffice.org/
   Google Scholar
• Leriche A, Charvier K, Bonniaud V, et al. Comparative study of the acceptability of the SpeediCath Set and Actreen Set catheterization sets in patients performing self-catheterization. Prog Urol 2006;16:347–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litherland AT, Schiotz HA. Patient-perceived discomfort with two coated urinary catheters. Br J Nurs 2007;16:284–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore KN, Fader M, Getliffe KL. Long-term bladder management by intermittent catheterisation in adults and children (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. The Cochrane Collaboration: Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Hallin P, Sullivan A, Kreuter M. Spinal cord injury and quality of life measures: a review of instrument psychometric quality. Spinal Cord 2000;38:509–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr, Dewey J. Health status and outcome assessment tools. Int Electron J Health Educ 2000;3:138–48
   Google Scholar
• Costa P, Perrouin-Verbe B, Colvez A, et al. Quality of life in spinal cord injury patients with urinary difficulties: development and validation of Qualiveen. Eur Urol 2001;39:107–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry patient reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labelling claims; 2009
   Google Scholar
• European Medicines Agency Pre-authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use. Reflection paper on the regulatory guidance for the use of health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures in the evaluation of medicinal products; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality of life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002;11:193–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConville A. Patients’ experiences of clean intermittent catheterisation. Nurs Times Plus 2002;98:55–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morse JM. Determining sample size. Qual Health Res 2000;10:3–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, eds. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994:173–94
   Google Scholar
• Wyndaele JJ. Complications of intermittent catheterization: their prevention and treatment. Spinal Cord 2002;40:536–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardener N, Arnold E, Tophill P, et al. Quality of life issues for patients with spinal cord injuries requiring bladder management devices – the patients’ perspective. International Continence Society Annual Meeting; 2007 20–24 Aug, Rotterdam. Available from: http://www.icsoffice.org/
   Google Scholar
• Jaquet A, Eiskjaer J, Steffensen K, Laursen BS. Coping with clean intermittent catherization – experiences from a patient perspective. Scand J Caring Sci 2009;23:660–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde MH, Brasch J, Zhang Y. A qualitative descriptive study of self-management issues in people with long-term intermittent urinary catheters. J Adv Nurs 2011;67:1254–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw C, Logan CK, Webber I, et al. Effect of clean intermittent self-catheterization on quality of life: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs 2008;61:641–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taskinen S, Fagerholm R, Ruutu M. Patient experience with hydrophilic catheters used in clean intermittent catheterization. J Pediatr Urol 2008;4:367–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar