References
- Månsson E, Lexell J. Performance of activities of daily living in multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:576–85
- Doble SE, Fisk JD, Fisher AG, et al. Functional competence of community-dwelling persons with multiple sclerosis using the assessment of motor and process skills. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:843–51
- Freeman JA, Langdon DW, Hobart JC, Thompson AJ. The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1997;42:236–44
- Kidd D, Howard RS, Losseff NA, Thompson AJ. The benefit of inpatient neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil 1995;9:198–203
- Solari A, Filippini G, Gasco P, et al. Physical rehabilitation has a positive effect on disability in multiple sclerosis patients. Neurology 1999;52:57–62
- Khan F, Turner-Stokes L, Ng L, Kilpatrick T. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD006036
- Thompson AJ. The effectiveness of neurological rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000;37:455–61
- World, Health, Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001
- Finlayson M, Impey MW, Nicolle C, Edwards J. Self-care, productivity and leisure limitations of people with multiple sclerosis in Manitoba. Can J Occup Ther 1998;65:299–308
- Lexell EM, Iwarsson S, Lexell J. The complexity of daily occupations in multiple sclerosis. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:241–8
- Körner M. Interprofessional teamwork in medical rehabilitation: a comparison of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team approach. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:745–55
- Khan F, Pallant JF, Turner-Stokes L. Use of goal attainment scaling in inpatient rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:652–9
- Turner-Stokes L, Williams H, Johnson J. Goal attainment scaling: does it provide added value as a person-centred measure for evaluation of outcome in neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury? J Rehabil Med 2009;41:528–35
- Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 4th ed. Ottawa, Ontario: CAOT Publications; 2005
- Bodiam C. The use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for the assessment of outcome on a neurorehabilitation unit. Br J Occup Ther 1999;62:123–6
- Chen Y-H, Rodger S, Polatajko H. Experiences with the COPM and client-centred practice in adult neurorehabilitation in Taiwan. Occup Ther Int 2002;9:167–84
- Trombly CA, Radomski MV, Trexel C, Burnet-Smith SE. Occupational therapy and achievement of self-identified goals by adults with acquired brain injury: phase II. Am J Occup Ther 2002;56:489–98
- Trombly CA, Radomski MV, Trexel C, Burnet-Smith SE. Achievement of self-identified goals by adults with traumatic brain infjury: phase I. Am J Occup Ther 1998;52:810–18
- Phipps S, Richardson P. Occupational therapy outcomes for clients with traumatic brain injury and stroke using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Am J Occup Ther 2007;61:328–34
- Eng JJ, Chu KS, Kim CM, et al. A community-based group exercise program for persons with chronic stroke. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:1271–8
- Donnelly C, Eng JJ, Hall J, et al. Client-centred assessment and the identification of meaningful treatment goals for individuals with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2004;42:302–7
- Esnouf JE, Taylor PN, Mann GE, Barrett CL. Impact on activities of daily living using a functional electrical stimulation device to improve dropped foot in people with multiple sclerosis, measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Mult Scler 2010;16:1141–7
- Cup EH, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Thijssen MC, van Kuyk-Minis MA. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:402–9
- Dedding C, Cardol M, Eyssen IC, et al. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a client-centred outcome measurement. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:660–7
- Eyssen IC, Beelen A, Dedding C, et al. The reproducibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:888–94
- Eyssen IC, Steultjens MP, Oud TA, et al. Responsiveness of the Canadian occupational performance measure. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011;48:517–28
- Wressle E, Samuelsson K, Henriksson CR. Responsiveness of the Swedish Version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scand J Occup Ther 1999;6:84–9
- Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N, et al. Pilot testing of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: clinical and measurement issues. Can J Occup Ther 1994;61:191–7
- Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444–52
- Finlayson M, Månsson Lexell E, Forwell S. Domestic life. In: Finlayson M, ed. Multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: from impairment to participation. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2012:355–80
- Karhula ME, Kanelisto KJ, Ruutiainen J, et al. The activities and participation categories of the ICF Core Sets for multiple sclerosis from the patient perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2012;early online:1–6
- Kersten P, Ellis-Hill C, McPherson KM, Harrington R. Beyound the RCT – understanding the relationship between interventions, individuals and outcome – the example of neurological rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1028–34