Understanding through experience: information, experience and understanding in clinical rehabilitation practice

References

• Gillon R. Ethics needs principles – four can encompass the rest – and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”. J Med Ethics 2003;29:307–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards SD. Nursing ethics: a principle-based approach. Basingstoke, Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Agich GJ. Dependence and autonomy in old age: an ethical framework for long-term care. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Faden RR, Beauchamp TL, King NMP. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986
   Google Scholar
• Berg JW, Appelbaum PS. Informed consent: legal theory and clinical practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Maclean A. Autonomy, informed consent and medical law: a relational challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Sim J. Respect for autonomy: issues in neurological rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1998;12:3–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas J. Ethical considerations of goal setting for patient care in rehabilitation medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993;72:228–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. Assessing competence to consent to treatment: a guide for physicians and other health professionals. Oxford (NY): Oxford University Press; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Lidz CW, Arnold RM. Rethinking autonomy in long term care. Univ Miami Law Rev 1993;47:603–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mars GM, Kempen GI, Widdershoven GA, et al. Conceptualizing autonomy in the context of chronic physical illness: relating philosophical theories to social scientific perspectives. Health 2008;12:333–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proot IM, Crebolder HFJ, AbuSaad HH, et al. Facilitating and constraining factors on autonomy: the views of stroke patients on admission into nursing homes. Clin Nursing Res 2000;9:460–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proot IM, Crebolder HFJ, AbuSaad HH, et al. Stroke patients' needs and experiences regarding autonomy at discharge from nursing home. Patient Educ Couns 2000;41:275–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Thiel GJ, van Delden JJ. The principle of respect for autonomy in the care of nursing home residents. Nurs Ethics 2001;8:419–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolmsjo IA, Sandman L, Andersson E. Everyday ethics in the care of elderly people. Nurs Ethics 2006;13:249–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser A, van der Bruggen H, Spreeuwenberg C, Widdershoven G. Autonomy through identification: a qualitative study of the process of identification used by people with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:209–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven L, Post M, de Witte L, van den Heuvel W. Strategies for autonomy used by people with cervical spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:249–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; 2006. [Cited 2013 05 14]. Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Cerniauskaite M, Quintas R, Boldt C, et al. Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2009: its use, implementation and operationalisation. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:281–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for? Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:596–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelle KM, Vik K. The ups and downs of social participation: experiences of wheelchair users in Norway. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:2479–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin JM, Strauss AL, ed. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi M. The tacit dimension. Garden City (NY): Doubleday; 1967
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg RJ, Forsythe GB, Hedlund J, et al. Practical intelligence in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Holm S. Justifying patient self-management – evidence based medicine or the primacy of the first person perspective. Med Health Care Phil 2005;8:159–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R, Schillinger D. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review. Med Decis Making 2011;31:151–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers DT. Self, society, and personal choice. New York (NY): Columbia University Press; 1989
   Google Scholar
• Proot IM, ter Meulen RHJ, Abu-Saad H, Crebolder HFJM. Supporting stroke patients' autonomy during rehabilitation. Nurs Ethics 2007;14:229–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mars GM, Proot IM, Janssen PP, et al. How do people with COPD or diabetes type 2 experience autonomy? An exploratory study. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:485–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar