Towards a consumer-informed research agenda for aphasia: preliminary work

References

• Evidence-Based Practice in Communication Disorders [Position Statement]. Rockville (MD): American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2005. Available from: www.asha.org/policy
   Google Scholar
• Erster SJ, Atkins S. Clinical reasoning and patient-centered care. In: Higgs J, Jones M, eds. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann; 2006:68–77
   Google Scholar
• Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centeredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med 2000;51:1087–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautakoski P, Korpijjaako-Huuhka AM, Klippi A. People with severe and moderate aphasia and their partners as estimators of communication skill: a client-centred evaluation. Aphasiology 2008;22:1269–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall L. The influence of professional values on the functional communication approach in aphasia. In: Worrall L, Frattali C, eds. Neurogenic communication disorders: a functional approach. New York: Thieme; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Hesketh A, Long A, Bowen A. Agreement on outcome: speaker, carer, and therapist perspectives on functional communication after stroke. Aphasiology 2011;25:291–308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend CE. Developing a comprehensive research agenda for people with intellectual disability to inform policy development and reform. J Policy Practice Intell Disab 2011;8:113–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Conference on Science. Science Agenda – Framework for Action. Text adopted July 1, 1999. Available from: http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/eng/framework
   Google Scholar
• International Association for Public Participation. IAP2 Core Values; 2007. Available from: http://www.iap2.org/
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World Report on Disability. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2011. Available from: www.who.int
   Google Scholar
• Council of Public Representatives Role of the Public in Research Work Group, Presented to NIH Director, 31 October 2008. Available from: http://copr.nih.gov/reports1/
   Google Scholar
• Abelson J, Giacomini M, Lehoux P, Gauvin, F-P. Bringing ‘the public’ into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice. Health Policy 2007;82:37–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed SM, Palermo A-GS. Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. Am J Public Health 2010;100:1380–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver S, Armes DG, Gyte G. Public involvement in setting a national research agenda: a mixed methods evaluation. Patient 2009;2:179–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet 2000;355:2037–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Public engagement and clinical trials: new models and disruptive technologies – Workshop Summary. Released October 14, 2011. Available from: http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Public-Engagement-and-Clinical-Trials-New-Models-and-Disruptive-Technologies-Workshop-Summary.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ehde DM, Wegener ST, Williams RM, et al. Developing, testing, and sustaining rehabilitation interventions via participatory action research. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2013;94:S30–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nass P, Levine S, Yancy C. Methods for involving patients in topic generation for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research – an international perspective. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2012. Available from: http://www.pcori.org/what-we-do/methodology/
   Google Scholar
• Sangvatanakal P, Hillege S, Lalor E, et al. Setting stroke research priorities: the consumer perspective. J Vasc Nurs 2010;28:121–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollock A, St. George B, Fenton M, Firkins, L. Top ten research priorities relating to life after stroke. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia LJ, Barrette J, Laroche C. Perceptions of the obstacles to work reintegration for persons with aphasia. Aphasiology 2000;14:269–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss B, Parr S, Petheram B. ‘Pick me up and not a down down, up up’: how are the identities of people with aphasia represented in aphasia, stroke and disability websites? Disab Soc 2004;19:759–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Paterson G. To what extent can people with communication difficulties contribute to health research? Nurse Res 2013;20:12–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, et al. Community Based Participatory Research: assessing the evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 99. (Prepared by RTI-University of North Carolina Evidence-Based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0016). AHRQ Publication 04-E022-2. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Chen PG, Diaz N, Lucas G, Rosenthal, MS. Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. Am J Prevent Med 2010;39:372–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbecq A, van de Ven A, Gustafson D. Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and delphi processes. Glenview: Scott, Foresman; 1975
   Google Scholar
• Hickson L, Worrall L, Yiu EML, Barnett H. Planning a communication education program for older people. Educ Gerontol 1996;22:257–69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkins BM, Worrall LE, Hickson LM. Stakeholder opinion of functional communication activities following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2004;18:696–704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuffrey-Winje I, Bernal J, Butler G, et al. Using Nominal Group Technique to investigate the views of people with intellectual disabilities on end-of-life care provision. J Adv Nurs 2007;58:80–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaining consensus among stakeholders through the Nominal Group Technique. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006. Available from: www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/pdf/brief7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williams EN, Morrow SL. Achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research: a pan-paradigmatic perspective. Psychother Res 2009;19:576–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan A, Worrall L, McKenna K. The relationship between specific features of aphasia-friendly written material and comprehension of written material for people with aphasia: an exploratory study. Aphasiology 2005;19:693–711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleligay A, Worrall LE, Rose TA. Readability of written health information provided to people with aphasia. Aphasiology 2008;22:383–407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose T, Worrall L, McKenna K. The effectiveness of aphasia-friendly principles for printed health education materials for people with aphasia following stroke. Aphasiology 2003;17:947–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadden BB, Hagstrom F, Koski PR. Neurogenic communication disorders: life stories and the narrative self. San Diego (CA): Plural Publishing; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Laures-Gore J, Hamilton A, Matheny K. Coping resources, perceived stress, and recent life experiences in individuals with aphasia. J Med Speech-Language Pathol 2007;15:423–31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland AL. Counseling families and adults with speech and language disorders: the view from a wellness perspective. In: Ball MJ, Damico JS, eds. Clinical aphasiology: future directions, a festschrift for Chris Code. New York (NY): Psychology Press; 2007
   Google Scholar
• LaPointe LL. Foundations: adaptation, accommodation, aristos. In: Lapointe LL, ed. Aphasia and related neurogenic language disorders. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Thieme; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Zirkelback EA, Reese RJ. A review of psychotherapy outcome research: considerations for school-based mental health care providers. Psychol Schools 2010;47:1084–100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams SE. The impact of aphasia on marital satisfaction. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1993;74:361–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr S. Living with severe aphasia: tracking social exclusion. Aphasiology 2007;21:98–123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avent J, Glista S, Wallace S, et al. Family information needs about aphasia. Aphasiology 2010;19:365–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar