Measuring participation outcomes following life-saving medical interventions: the Role Checklist Version 2: Quality of Performance

References

• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levasseur M. ‘Optimal’ participation: a reflective look. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1231–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:569–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNOS. United Network for Organ Sharing. 2013. Available from: http://www.unos.org/data/ [last accessed 2011 October 15]
   Google Scholar
• Tome S, Wells JT, Said A, Lucey MR. Quality of life after liver transplantation. A systematic review. J Hepatol 2008;48:567–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saab S, Bownik H, Ayoub N, et al. Differences in health-related quality of life scores after orthotopic liver transplantation with respect to selected socioeconomic factors. Liver Transplant 2011;17:580–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott PJ. Participation in valued roles post-liver transplant. Br J Occup Ther 2010;73:517–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley F, Kielhofner G, Barris R, Reichler RK. The Role Checklist: development and empirical assessment of reliability. Occup Ther J Res 1986;6:158–70
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson AE. The role checklist. In: Hemphill-Pearson BJ, ed. Assessments in occupational therapy mental health: an integrative approach. Thorofare (NJ): SLACK; 2008
   Google Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Badley EM. Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:2335–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers MP. Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of participation: an overview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S5–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter KL, Foley NC, Jutai JW, Teasell RW. Assessment of participation outcomes in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation interventions. Int J Rehabil Res 2007;30:339–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:S22–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockow T, Cieza A, Kuhlow H, et al. Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on musculoskeletal disorders and chronic widespread pain using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. J Rehabil Med 2004;36:30–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prodinger B, Cieza A, Williams DA, et al. Measuring health in patients with fibromyalgia: content comparison of questionnaires based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:650–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepers VP, Ketelaar M, van de Port IG, et al. Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:221–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuringer M, Grill E, Boldt C, et al. Systematic review of measures and their concepts used in published studies focusing on rehabilitation in the acute hospital and in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:419–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magasi S, Post MW. A comparative review of contemporary participation measures’ psychometric properties and content coverage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S17–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M, Dijkers MPJM, Gordon WA, et al. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004;19:459--81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:577–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M. Perspectives on outcome: what disability insiders and outsiders each bring to the assessment table. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:S36–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P. For the adoption of mechanisms for the implementation of the UN convention on rights of persons with disabilities. Devellopement humain. handicap et changement social 2008;16:17–23
   Google Scholar