Impact of legal regulations and administrative policies on persons with SCI: identifying potential research priorities through expert interviews

References

• Bickenbach JE. Ethics, law, and policy. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Forst L, Friedman L, Chukwu A. Reliability of the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. J Occup Env Med 2010;52:1201–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöhr S, Bollag Y, Auerbach H, et al. Quality assessment of a randomly selected sample of Swiss medical expertises – a pilot study. Swiss Med Wkly 2011;141:w13173 . doi:10.4414/smw.2011.13173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wunderlich GS, Rice DP, Amado NL, eds. The dynamics of disability: measuring and monitoring disability for social security programs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Gerber PJ, Batalo CG, Achola EO. Dyslexia and learning disabilities in Canada and the UK: the impact of its disability employment laws. Dyslexia 2012;18:166–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber A, Weber U, Schlenker-Schulte C, Schulte K. Gesetzeskenntnis bei Studierenden mit Hörbehinderung: Ergebnisse aus dem Projekt GINKO [Knowledge of laws by students with hearing impairment: results from the GINKO-project]. Rehabilitation 2013;52:406–11
   Google Scholar
• Lee P. Has disability discrimination legislation changed the legal framework for epilepsy in the United Kingdom? Seizure 2010;19:619–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVivo MJ, Stover SL, Fine PR. The relationship between sponsorship and rehabilitation outcome following spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1989;27:470–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elrod CS, DeJong G. Determinants of utilization of physical rehabilitation services for persons with chronic and disabling conditions: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:114–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips VL, Hunsaker AE, Florence CS. Return to work and productive activities following a spinal cord injury: the role of income and insurance. Spinal Cord 2012;50:623–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu H, Shewchuk RM, Chen Y, Deutsch A. Impact of medicare prospective payment system on acute rehabilitation outcomes of patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:346–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate DG, Forchheimer M, Daugherty J, Maynard F. Determining differences in post discharge outcomes among catastrophically and noncatastrophically sponsored outpatients with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:89–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate DG, Stiers W, Daugherty J, et al. The effects of insurance benefits coverage on functional and psychosocial outcomes after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:407–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate DG, Forchheimer M, Daugherty J, Maynard F. Insurance benefits coverage for persons with spinal cord injuries: determining differences across payors. J Am Paraplegia Soc 1993;16:76–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomlinson M, Swartz L, Officer A, et al. Research priorities for health of people with disabilities: an expert opinion exercise. Lancet 2009;374:1857–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma 2004;21:1371–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilcher SJT, Craven BC, McColl MA, et al. Application of the Andersen’s health care utilization framework to secondary complications of spinal cord injury: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:531–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Reinhardt JD, Cieza A, et al. Developing Swiss paraplegic research: building a research institution from the comprehensive perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1063–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KRW. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation research: patient priorities, current deficiencies and potential directions. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1209–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Marshall M. The key informant technique. Family Practice 1996 January 1. 1996;13:92–7
   Google Scholar
• Meuser M, Nagel U. Das Experteninterview – konzeptionelle Grundlagen und methodische Anlage. In: Pickel S, Pickel G, Lauth H-J, Jahn D, eds. Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2009:465–79
   Google Scholar
• Liebold R, Trinczek R. Experteninterview. In: Kühl S, Strodtholz P, Taffertshofer A, eds. Handbuch Methoden der Organisationsforschung: Quantitative und Qualitative Methoden. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2009:33–56
   Google Scholar
• Swiss Paraplegic Centre. Executive Board. Available from: http://www.paranet.ch/en/pub/spz/about_us/executive_board.htm [last accessed 5 Nov 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Swiss Paraplegic Foundation. Annual report 2011 of the Swiss Paraplegic Group. Nottwil: Swiss Paraplegic Foundation; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 2000;23:334–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006:3;77–101
   Google Scholar
• Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods 2003;15:85–109
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea P. Judging quality: evaluative criteria and epistemic communities. In: Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P, eds. Interpretation and method: empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Armonk (NY): M.E. Sharpe; 2006:89–113
   Google Scholar
• Steinke I. Quality criteria in qualitative research. In: Flick U, von Kardoff E, Steinke I, eds. A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage Publications; 2004:184–90
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt C. The analysis of semi-structured interviews. In: Flick U, Von Kardoff E, Steinke I, eds. London: Sage Publications; 2004:253–8
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers (a synthesis of findings across OECD countries). Paris: OECD; 2010
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers (Norway, Poland and Switzerland). Paris: OECD; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Knupfer C, Stutz H. Absicherung unbezahlter Care-Arbeit von Frauen und Männern. Soziale Sicherheit CHSS 2012:9–12
   Google Scholar
• Marmor TR, Mashaw JL. Understanding social insurance: fairness, affordability, and the ‘modernization' of social security and medicare. Health Aff 2006;25:w114–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark WL, Haldeman S, Johnson P, et al. Back impairment and disability determination: another attempt at objective, reliable rating. Spine 1988;13:332–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post MWM, Brinkhof MWG, von Elm E, et al. For the SWISCI study group. Design of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011;90:S5–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar