The performance quality rating scale (PQRS): reliability, convergent validity, and internal responsiveness for two scoring systems

References

• Dawson DR, Gaya A, Hunt A, et al. Using the cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance approach with adults with traumatic brain injury. Can J Occup Ther 2009;76:115–27
   Google Scholar
• McEwen SE, Polatajko HJ, Huijbregts MPJ, Ryan JD. Inter-task transfer of meaningful, functional skills following a cognitive-based treatment: results of three multiple baseline design experiments in adults with chronic stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2010;20:541–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwen SE, Polatajko HJ, Huijbregts MP, Ryan JD. Exploring a cognitive-based treatment approach to improve motor-based skill performance in chronic stroke: results of three single case experiments. Brain Inj 2009;23:1041–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller L, Polatajko HJ, Missiuna C, et al. A pilot of a cognitive treatment for children with developmental coordination disorder. Human Mov Sci 2001;20:183–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McColl MA, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1990;57:82–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forbes DA. Goal attainment scaling. A responsive measure of client outcomes. J Gerontol Nurs 1998;24:34–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemmens RJ, Timmermans AA, Janssen-Potten YJ, et al. Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: a systematic review. BMC Neurol 2012;12:21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini R, Polatajko H. Verbal self-guidance as a treatment approach for children with developmental coordination disorder: a systematic replication study. Occupat Therap J Res 1998;18:157–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan S, Steinke L, Mandich A. Exploring a cognitive intervention for children with pervasive developmental disorder. Can J Occup Ther 2009;76:23–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polatajko HJ, McEwen SE, Ryan JD, Baum CM. Pilot randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive strategy use to improve goal performance after stroke. Am J Occup Ther 2012;66:104–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodger S, Ireland S, Vun M. Can cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP) help children with Asperger’s syndrome to master social and organisational goals? Br J Occup Ther 2008;71:23–32
   Google Scholar
• Gowland C, VanHullenaar S, Torresin W, et al. Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment. Development, validation, and administration manual. Hamilton, ON: Chedoke-McMaster Hospitals and McMaster University; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Martini R, Mandich A, Green D. (2014) Implementing a modified cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance approach for use in a group format. Br J Occup Ther 2014;77:214–19
   Google Scholar
• Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement assessment battery for children – second edition (movement ABC-2). London, UK: The Psychological Corporation; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Phipps S, Richardson P. Occupational therapy outcomes for clients with traumatic brain injury and stroke using the Canadian occupational performance measure. Am J Occup Ther 2007;61:328–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Darrah J, Pollock N, et al. Focus on function – a randomized controlled trial comparing two rehabilitation interventions for young children with cerebral palsy. BMC Pediatr 2007;7:31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eyssen IC, Beelen A, Dedding C, et al. The reproducibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:888–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Babtiste S, Carswell-Opzoomer A, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, 3th ed. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics: the bare essentials, 3rd ed. Toronto, Canada: BC Decker; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res 1998;7:301–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bragante KC, Nascimento DM, Motta NW. Evaluation of acute radiation effects on mandibular movements of patients with head and neck cancer. Rev Bras Fisioter 2012;16:141–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:459–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meek GE, Ozgur C, Dunning K. Comparison of the t vs. Wilcoxon signed-rank test for Likert scale data and small samples. J Modern Appl Statist Meth [Internet]. Revised 2007;6:91–106
   Google Scholar
• Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res 2001;10:571–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lexell JE, Downham DY. How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:719–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu WS, Wang CH, Lin JH, et al. The minimal detectable change of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement measure. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:615–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Publications; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Jones G, Noble ADL, Schauer B, Cogger N. Measuring the attenuation in a subject-specific random effect with paired data. J Data Sci 2009;7:179–88
   Google Scholar
• Pitman-Morgan Test: test the difference between correlated variances. Available from: http://how2stats.blogspot.ca/2011/06/testing-difference-between-correlated.html [last accessed 14 Oct 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Middel B, van Sonderen E. Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research. Int J Integr Care 2002;2:e15 (2–18)
   Google Scholar
• Wang CY, Sheu CF, Protas EJ. Test-retest reliability and measurement errors of six mobility tests in the community-dwelling elderly. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr 2009;4:8–13
   Google Scholar
• Cup EH, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Thijssen MC, van Kuyk-Minis MA. Reliability and validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:402–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan CCH, Lee TMC. Validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure. Occupat Therap Int 1997;4:231–49
   Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Hobbs Qadri L. A behavioral observation system for quantifying arm activity in daily life after stroke. Rehabil Psychol 2009;54:398–403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar