Return to work or job transition? Employer dilemmas in taking social responsibility for return to work in local workplace practice

References

• Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and wellbeing? London: The Stationery Office; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Immervoll H. Activation Policies in OECD Countries: An Overview of Current Approaches. IZA J Labor Policy 2012;1:9
   Google Scholar
• MacEachen E, Ferrier S, Kosny A, Chambers L. A deliberation on ‘‘hurt versus harm’’ logic in early return to work policy. Policy Pract Health Safety 2007;5:41–62
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkel R, Hornemann Møller I. Active social policies in the EU: inclusion through participation? Glasgow: Policy Press; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Kuoppala J, Lamminpaa A. Rehabilitation and work ability: a systematic literature review. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:796–804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franche R-L, Cullen K, Clarke J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:607–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 1998;8:113–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw W, Robertson MM, McLellan RK, et al. A controlled case study of supervisor training to optimize response to injury in the food processing industry. Work 2006;26:107–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hees HL, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Koeter MWJ, et al. Towards a new definition of return-to-work outcomes in common mental disorders from a multi-stakeholder perspective. PLoS One 2012;7:1–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:507–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haafkens JA, Kopnina H, Meerman MGM, Van Dijk FJH. Facilitating job retention for chronically ill employees: perspectives of line managers and human resource managers. BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11:104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren K, Ivanoff S D. Supervisors' views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:93–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemieux P, Durand M, Hong QN. Supervisors' perception of the factors influencing the return to work of workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2011;21:293–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JHAM, De Boer AGEM, et al. Supervisory behavior as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work due to mental health problems. Occup Environ Med 2004;61:817–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjulin Å, MacEachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors' experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil 2009;20:311–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunstan D, MacEachen E. Bearing the brunt: co-workers' experiences of work reintegration processes. J Occup Rehabil 2013;23:44–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjulin Å, MacEachen E, Stiwne EE, Ekberg K. The social interaction of return to work explored from co-workers' experiences. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1979–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne-Jones G, Buck R, Porteous C, et al. What happens to work if you're unwell? beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting. J Occup Rehabil 2011;21:31–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachen E, Kosny A, Scott-Dixon K, et al. Workplace health understandings and processes in small businesses: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:180–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz MS, Carroll AB. Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach. Bus Ethics Q 2003;13:503–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Work Environments Authority's Statute Book: work adjustments and rehabilitation (1994)
   Google Scholar
• Iseskog T. Arbetsgivarens rehabiliteringsansvar [The employer's rehabilitation responsibility]. Mölnlycke: Norsteds Juridik AB; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Lippel K, Lötters F. Public insurance systems: a comparison of cause – based and disability-based income support systems. In: Loisel P, Anema H, eds. Handbook of work disability: prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson M, Berglund T. Labour market policies in transition: from social engineering to standby-ability. In: Larsson B, Letell M, Thörn H, eds. Transformation of the Swedish Welfare State From Social Engineering to Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Hetzler A. Labor market activation policies for the long term ill – a sick idea?. Eur J Soc Security 2010;11:369–403
   Google Scholar
• Socialförsäkringsutredningen P. Sveriges socialförsäkringar i jämförande perspektiv En institutionell analys av sjuk-, arbetsskade- och arbetslöshetsförsäkringarna i 18 OECD-länder 1930 till 2010 [Sweden's social insurances in a comparative perspective: an institutional analysis of the sickness-, workplace injury and unemployment insurance in 18 OECD-contries 1930 until 2010]. Stockholm: Statens offentliga utredningar; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Proposition. En reformerad sjukskrivningsprocess för ökad återgång i arbete [A reformed sick-leave process for increased return to work] 2007/08:136
   Google Scholar
• SOU. Mera försäkring och mera arbete [More insurance and more work]. Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs; 2006:86
   Google Scholar
• Ståhl C, Müssener U, Svensson T. Implementation of standardized time limits in sickness insurance and return-to-work: experiences of four actors. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:1404–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SSIA. Sjukfrånvarons utveckling – Delrapport 1, år 2014 [The development of sickness absence – report 1, year 2014]. Stockholm: SSIA; 2014
   Google Scholar
• Ekberg K, Wåhlin C, Persson J, et al. Early and late return to work after sick leave – predictors in a cohort of sick-listed individuals with mental disorders. (Submitted)
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim U, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:209–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. London: SAGE; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1227–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist R. Att sätta gränser: organisationer och reformer i arbetsrehabilitering [Set limits: organizations and reforms in work rehabilitation]. Umeå: Boréa; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Eakin JM. Leaving it up to the workers: sociological perspectives on the management of health and safety in small workplaces. Int J Health Serv 1992;22:689–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin J, MacEachen E, Clarke J. ‘Playing it smart’ with return to work: small workplace experience under Ontario’s policy of self-reliance and early return. Policy Pract Health Safety 2003;1:19–42
   Google Scholar
• Seing I, Ståhl C, Nordenfelt L, et al. Policy and practice of work ability. A negotiation of responsibility in organizing return to work. J Occup Rehabil 2012;22:553–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny DT. Employers’ perspectives on the provision of suitable duties in occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil 1999;9:267–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baril R, Berthelette D, Massicotte P. Early return to work of injured workers: multidimensional patterns of individual and organizational factors. Safety Sci 2003;41:277–300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell B, Ladipo D, Wilkingson F. (eds). Job insecurity and work intensification. London: Routledge; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Burke RJ, Cooper CL. The organization in crisis: downsizing, restructuring, and privatization. Oxford: Blackwell; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Gowing MK, Kraft JD, Quick JC (eds). The new organizational reality: downsizing, restructuring, and revitalization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1997
   Google Scholar
• Gallie D, White M, Cheng Y, Tomlinson M. Restructuring the employment relationship. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Howard A. The changing nature of work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Hood C. A public management for all seasons?. Public Adm 1991;69:3–19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes OE. Public management and administration: an introduction. New York: Palgrave; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt C, Bouckaert G. Public management reform. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Vahtera J, Kivimäki M, Pentti J, Theorell T. Effect of change in the psychosocial work environment on sickness absence: a seven year follow up of initially healthy employees. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2000;54:484–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahtera J, Kivimäki M, Pentti J. Effect of organisational downsizing on health of employees. Lancet 1997;350:1124–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson N, Schalk R. The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect. J Organ Behav 1998;19:637–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway N, Briner RB. Understanding psychological contracts at work: a critical evaluation of theory and research. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Seing I, MacEachen E, Ståhl C, Ekberg K. Early-return-to-work in the context of an intensification of working life and changing employment relationships. J Occup Rehabil 2014. DOI 10.1007/s10926-014-9526-5. [E-pub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Meyer J, Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 1977;83:340–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. The iron cage revisted; Institutionalized isomorphism and collective identity in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 1983;48:147–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thedvall R. Rituals of legitimation. Organising accountability in EU employment policy. In: Boström M, Garsten G, eds. Organizing transnational accountability mobilization, tools, challenges. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Westergård A. Arbetsgivarens ökade ansvar för sjuklön och rehabilitering kontra arbetstagarnas integritet – Går det att förena? [Employers' increased responsibility for sick pay and rehabilitation versus workers' integrity]. Uppsala; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Ståhl C. Samverkan kring återgång i arbete: var är arbetsgivarna? [Cooperation on return to work: where are the employers?]. Socialmedicinsk Tidskrift 2009;86:265–74
   Google Scholar
• Melén D. Med arbetsförmåga, utan anställningsbarhet [With work ability, without employability]. Socialmedicinsk Tidskrift 2009;86:265–74
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. Sweden: Will the Recent Reforms Make it?; 2009
   Google Scholar
• SOU. Fokus på åtgärder – En plan för effektiv rehabilitering i arbetslivet [Focus on measures – A plan for an effective rehabilitation in working life]. Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Bergendorff S. Rehabilitering – ett långt lidandes historia [Rehabilitation – a long history of suffering]. Stockholm: Sverige; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Riksrevisionen. Tas sjukskrivnas arbetsförmåga tillvara? Försäkringskassans kontakter med arbetsgivare [Is the sick-listed workers' work ability concidered? The Swedish Social Insurance Agency's contacts with employers]. Stockholm; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield L, MacEachen E, Tompa E, Kalcevich C. A critical review of literature on experience-rating in workers’ compensation systems. Policy Pract Health Safety 2012;10:3–25
   Google Scholar
• van Oorschot W BK. The battle against numbers: disability policies in the Netherlands. Eur J Soc Security 2000;2:343–61
   Google Scholar
• MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Chambers L. The “toxic dose” of system problems: why some injured workers don't return to work as expected. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:349–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar