The use of goal attainment scaling in neuropsychological rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis

References

• Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:1139–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdon DW. Cognition in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 2011;24:244–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca J, Nocentini U. Neuropsychological, medical and rehabilitative management of persons with multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabilitation 2011;29:197–219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer S, Khan F, Kesselring J. Rehabilitation interventions in multiple sclerosis: an overview. J Neurol 2012;259:1994–2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien AR, Chiaravalloti N, Goverover Y, DeLuca J. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis: a review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:761–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosti-Otajärvi EM, Hämäläinen PI. Neuropsychological rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2:CD009131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2008;4:141–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurn J, Kneebone I, Cropley M. Goal setting as an outcome measure: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:756–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J 1968;4:443–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu M, Law AV. Goal-attainment scaling: a review and applications to pharmacy practice. Res Soc Admin Pharm 2012;8:102–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwens SFM, van Heugten CM, Verhey FRJ. The practical use of goal attainment scaling for people with acquired brain injury who receive cognitive rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:310–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockwood K, Joyce B, Stolee P. Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in cognitive rehabilitation patients. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:581–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan F, Pallant JF, Turner-Stokes L. Use of goal attainment scaling in inpatient rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:652–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuifbergen AK, Becker H, Timmerman GM, Kullberg V. The use of individualized goal setting to facilitate behavior change in women with multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs 2003;35:94–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Learmonth YC, Paul L, Miller L, et al. The effects of a 12-week leisure centre-based, group exercise intervention for people moderately affected with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil 2012;26:579–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasny-Pacini A, Hiebel J, Pauly F, et al. Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation: a literature-based update. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2013;56:212–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Müller M, Strobl R, Grill E. Goals of patients with rehabilitation needs in acute hospitals: goal achievement is an indicator for improved functioning. J Rehabil Med 2011;43:145–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann S, Decker J, Müller M, et al. The ICF forms a useful framework for classifying individual patient goals in post-acute rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2011;43:151–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kus S, Müller M, Strobl R, Grill E. Patient goals in post-acute geriatric rehabilitation: goal attainment is an indicator for improved functioning. J Rehabil Med 2011;43:156–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntynen A, Rosti-Otajärvi E, Koivisto K, et al. Neuropsychological rehabilitation does not improve cognitive performance but reduces perceived cognitive deficits in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomised, controlled, multi-centre trial. Mult Scler 2014;20:99–107
   Google Scholar
• Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983;13:227–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict RHB, Munschauer F, Linn R, et al. Screening for multiple sclerosis cognitive impairment using a self-administered 15-item questionnaire. Mult Scler 2003;9:95–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith A. The symbol-digit modalities test: a neuropsychological test of learning and other cerebral disorders. In: Helmuth J, ed. Learning disorders. Seattle: Special Child Publications; 1968:83–91
   Google Scholar
• Rao SM, ed. A manual for the brief repeatable battery of neuropsychological tests in multiple sclerosis. New York, NY: National Multiple Sclerosis Society; 1990
   Google Scholar
• Sarajuuri J, Koskinen S. Computer-administered cognitive rehabilitation: FORAMEN-rehab programs. 4th world congress on brain injury research, innovations, and quality of life for the new millennium, 2001 5–9 May; Toronto, Italy
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:362–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepulcre J, Vanotti S, Hernández R, et al. Cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis using the brief repeatable battery-neuropsychology test. Mult Scler 2006;12:187–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 1935;18:643–62
   Google Scholar
• Reitan RM. Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Motor Skill 1958;8:271–6
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan MJ, Edgley K, Dehoux E. A survey of multiple sclerosis: I. Perceived cognitive problems and compensatory strategy use. Can J Rehabil 1990;4:99–105
   Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart J, Lamping D, Fitzpatrick R, et al. The multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29). A new patient-based outcome measure. Brain 2001;124:962–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner IK, Raselli C, Stöcklin M, et al. The fatigue scale for motor and cognitive functions (FSMC): validation of a new instrument to assess multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. Mult Scler 2009;15:1509–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization QHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 1998;28:551–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:205–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:212–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soberg HL, Finset A, Roise O, Bautz-Holter E. Identification and comparison of rehabilitation goals after multiple injuries: an ICF analysis of the patients’, physiotherapists’ and other allied professionals’ reported goals. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:340–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Grimby G. Foreword: applying the ICF in medicine. J Rehabil Med 2004;44:5–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar