Biomedical and psychosocial factors influencing transtibial prosthesis fit: a Delphi survey among health care professionals

References

• Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grisé MC, Potvin D. Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:706–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, MacKenzie EJ, et al. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:723–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansam K, Neumann V, O’Connor R, Bhakta B. Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: a systematic review of the literature. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:593–603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P. Introduction to the special issue on psychosocial perspectives on amputation and prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:827–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legro MW, Reiber G, del Aguila M, et al. Issues of importance reported by persons with lower limb amputations and prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36:155–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD, Fox J. Body image and prosthesis satisfaction in the lower limb amputee. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:925–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond D, MacLachlan M. Psychological issues in prosthetic and orthotic practice: a 25 year review of psychology in Prosthetics and Orthotics International. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002;26:182–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher K, Hanspal R. Body image and patients with amputations: does the prosthesis maintain the balance? Int J Rehabil Res 1998;21:355–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales and quality of life in people with lower-limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:730–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD. The social meanings of prosthesis use. J Health Psychol 2005;10:425–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybarczyk B, Nyenhuis DL, Nicholas JJ, et al. Body image, perceived social stigma, and the prediction of psychosocial adjustment to leg amputation. Rehabil Psychol 1995;40:95–110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetterhahn KA, Hanson C, Levy CE. Effect of participation in physical activity on body image of amputees. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:194–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD. Being like everybody else: the personal meanings of being a prosthesis user. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:573–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond DM, MacLachlan M. Affective distress and amputation-related pain among older men with long-term, traumatic limb amputations. J Pain Symptom Manage 2006;31:362–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WC, Zhang M. Using computational simulation to aid in the prediction of socket fit: a preliminary study. Med Eng Phys 2007;29:923–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond D, Gallagher P, Henderson-Slater D, Chatfield R. Pain and psychosocial adjustment to lower limb amputation amongst prosthesis users. Prosthet Orthot Int 2008;32:244–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell P, Noroozi S, Vinney J, Andrews S. Developments in the trans-tibial prosthetic socket fitting process: a review of past and present research. Prosthet Orthot Int 2000;24:97–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linde H, Hofstad CJ, Geurts AC, et al. A systematic literature review of the effect of different prosthetic components on human functioning with a lower-limb prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004;41:555–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linde H, Hofstad CJ, Van Limbeek J, et al. Use of the Delphi technique for developing national clinical guidelines for prescription of lower-limb prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42:693–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenbelt HE, Geertzen JH, Jonkman MF, Dijkstra PU. Determinants of skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:74–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ, Burgess AR. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations: a long-term outcome study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:563–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamson MA, Skinner HB, Effeney DJ, Wilson LA. Prescription options for the below knee amputee. A review. Orthopedics 1985;8:210–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins DM, Karmarkar A, Relich R, et al. Review of research on prosthetic devices for lower extremity amputation. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2006;34:379–438
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lilya M, Johansson T, Öberg T. Movement of the tibial end in a PTB prosthesis socket. A sagittal X-ray study of the PTB prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993;17:21–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polliack AA, Craig DD, Sieh RC, et al. Laboratory and clinical tests of a prototype pressure sensor for clinical assessment of prosthetic socket fit. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002;26:23–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanspal RS, Fisher K, Nieveen R. Prosthetic socket fit comfort score. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:1278–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grisé MC. Prosthetic profile of the amputee questionnaire: validity and reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1309–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legro MW, Reiber GD, Smith DG, et al. Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:931–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffalitzky E, Gallagher P, MacLachalan M, Wegener ST. Developing consensus on important factors associated with lower limb prosthetic prescription and use. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:2085–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff A, Havey R, Carandang G, et al. Quantification of shear stress within a transtibial prosthetic socket. Foot Ankel Int 2014;35:779–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholizadeh H, Abu Osman NA, Eshraghi A, Ali S. The effects of suction systems on transtibial amputees’ gait performance. PLoS One 2014;9:e94520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond R, Grant RC, Pencharz PB, et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi Studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:401–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:1008–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. PARE 2007;12:1–7
   Google Scholar
• Hachisuka K, Nakamura T, Ohmine S, et al. Hygiene problems of residual limb and silicone liners in transtibial amputees wearing the total surface bearing socket. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1286–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilja M, Hoffmann P, Öberg T. Morphological changes during early trans-tibial prosthetic fitting. Prosthet Orthot Int 1998;22:115–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baars ECT, Geertzen JHB. A patient with donning related stump wounds: a case report. Prosthet Orthot Int 2008;32:219–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WC, Deathe AB, Speechley M, Koval J. The influence of falling, fear of falling, and balance confidence on prosthetic mobility and social activity among individuals with a lower extremity amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1238–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan-Hall MK, Yardley L, Watts RJ. Engagement in activities revealing the body and psychosocial adjustment in adults with a trans-tibial prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002;26:15–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WC, Speechley M, Deathe B. The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1031–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen CC. A survey of amputees: functional level and life satisfaction, information needs, and the prosthetist’s role. JPO 1991;3:125–9
   Google Scholar