538
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Rehabilitation and Practice

Evaluating health services with point of service feedback: perspectives and experiences of patients, staff and community volunteers in an inpatient rehabilitation facility

, , &
Pages 1997-2005 | Received 16 Apr 2014, Accepted 04 Dec 2014, Published online: 06 Jan 2015

References

  • Goodrich J, Cornwell J. Seeing the person in the patient. The Point of Care review paper. London: The Kings Fund; 2008
  • Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Medicine Io, editor. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001
  • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. Patient-centred care: improving quality and safety by focusing care on patients and consumers. Canberra; 2011
  • Cleary PD. Satisfaction may not suffice!: a commentary on ‘a Patient's Perspective’. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1998;14:35–7
  • Bleich SN, Ozaltin E, Murray CK. How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient experience? Bull World Health Organ 2009;87:271–8
  • Coulter A, Fitzpatrick R, Cornwell J. Point of care. Measures of patients’ experience in hospital: purpose, methods and uses. London: The Kings Fund; 2009
  • Cleary PD. The increasing importance of patient surveys. BMJ 1999;319:721–2
  • Davies E, Cleary PD. Hearing the patient's voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:428–32
  • Jensen HI, Ammentorp J, Kofoed P-E. User satisfaction is influenced by the interval between a health care service and the assessment of the service. Soc Sci Med 2010;70:1882–7
  • Dirocco DN, Day SC. Obtaining patient feedback at point of service using electronic kiosks. Am J Manag Care 2011;17:e270–6
  • CFS. 2006 17 March. Customer feedback systems Australasia. In Customer Feedback Systems Australasia. Customer Feedback Systems Australasia Available from: http://www.cfs-australasia.com/ [last accessed 17 March 2010]
  • de Silva D. Measuring patient experience. London: The Health Foundation; 2013
  • England NHS. 2013 16 April. Putting patients first. The NHS England business plan for 2013/14–2015/16. Available from: http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/ppf-1314-1516.pdf [last accessed 16 April 2014]
  • Department of Health. Victorian patient satisfaction monitor. Wave 18 report for McKellar Centre. Melbourne, Victoria: Department of Health; 2010
  • Gill SD. Point-of-service questionnaires can reliably assess patients’ experiences. Eur J Person Centered Healthcare 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
  • Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2009
  • Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research. London, UK: Sage Publications; 2006
  • ACSQHC. National safety and quality health service standards. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2011
  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CAHPS Hospital Survey (HCAHPS) Quality Assurance Guidelines, version 8. 2013
  • Livneh H, Antonak RF. Psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and disability: a primer for counselors. J Counsel Dev 2005;83:12–20
  • Ellis-Hill CS, Horn S. Change in identity and self-concept: a new theoretical approach to recovery following a stroke. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:279–87
  • Vickery CD, Sepehri A, Evans CC. Self-esteem in an acute stroke rehabilitation sample: a control group comparison. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:179–87
  • Paulhus DL, Vazire S. The self-report method. In: Robins RW, Fraley RC, Krueger RF, eds. Handbook of research methods in personality psychology. New York: Guilford; 2007:224–39
  • Sitzia J. How valid and reliable are patien satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1999;11:319–28
  • Wensing M, Elwyn G. Research on patients' views in the evaluation and improvement of quality of care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:153–7
  • Paulhus DL. Measurement and control of response bias. In: Robinson JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS, eds. Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press; 1991:17–59
  • Dainton M, Zelley ED. Explaining theories of interpersonal communication. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2004

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.