A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test–retest reliability and internal consistency

References

• Frymoyer J, Cats Baril W. An overview of the incidences and cost of low-back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 1991;22:263–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poiraudeau S, Rannou F, Revel M. Functional restoration programs for low back pain: a systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2007;50:425–9
   Google Scholar
• Biering-Sorenson F. Physical measurements as risk indicators for low back trouble over a one-year period. Spine 1984;9:106–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson GBJ. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 1999;354:581–5
   Google Scholar
• Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J. The Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1983;8:141–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:3115–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbank J, Pynsent P. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000;25:2940–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calmels P, Bethoux F, Condemine A, Fayolle-Minon I. Tools to measure functional parameters in low back pain: low back pain disability assessment tools. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2005;48:288–97
   Google Scholar
• Ostelo R, Deyo R, Stratford P, Waddell G. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 2008;33:90–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo R, Battie M, Beurskens A, et al. Outcomes measures for low back pain research: a proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998;15:2003–13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:197–334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach L, Meehl P. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 1955;52:281–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boscainos P, Sapkas G, Stilianessi E, et al. Greek versions of the Oswestry and Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaires. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;411:40–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osthus H, Cziske R, Jacobi E. Cross-cultural adaptation of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index and evaluation of its measurement properties. Spine 2006;31:448–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lue Y, Hsieh C, Huang M, et al. Development of a Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index Version 2.1. Spine 2008;33:2354–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough P. Validation of the Afrikaans versions of the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index [doctoral dissertation]. Johannesburg (South Africa): University of Johannesburg; 2010:94
   Google Scholar
• Ramzy R. Validation of the Arabic version of the Oswestry Disability Index developed in Tunisia for low back pain patients in the UAE [thesis]. Stellenbosch (South Africa): University of Stellenbosch; 2008:181
   Google Scholar
• Kim D, Lee S, Lee H, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2005;30:123–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valasek T, Varga P, Szoverfi Z, et al. Reliability and validity study on the Hungarian versions of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Eur Spine J 2013;4:831–918
   Google Scholar
• Pekkanen L, Kautiainen H, Ylinen J, et al. Reliability and validity study of the Finnish version 2.0 of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2011;36:332–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payares K, Lugo L, Morales V, Londono A. Validation in Colombia of the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire in patients with low back pain. Spine 2011;36:1730–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannion A, Junge A, Fairbank J, et al. Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Eur Spine J 2004;15:55–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotle M, Brox J, Vollestad N. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. J Rehabil Med 2003;35:241–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miekisiak G. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Polish version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2013;38:237–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauridsen H, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, et al. Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: cross cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations. Eur Spine J 2006;15:1705–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veena D, Raiturker P, Aditi K. Validity and reliability of English and Marathi Oswestry Disability Index in Indian population. Spine 2013;38:662–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis I, Fortin L. Development of a French–Canadian version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2011;37:439–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, et al. Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and Short-Form 36. Spine 2003;28:1601–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi S, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, et al. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian Versions. Spine 2006;31:454–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Tao H, Luo Z. Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2009;34:1211–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monticone M, Baiardi P, Ferrari S, et al. Development of the Italian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-I): a cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity study. Spine 2009;34:2090–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman J, Norvell D, Hermsmeyer J, et al. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine 2011;36:54–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J, Gandek B. Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA project approach. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:945–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo R, Diehr P, Patrick D. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 1991;12:142–58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudson-Cook N, Tomes-Nicholson K, Breen A. A revised Oswestry disability questionnaire. In: Roland MO, Jenner JR, eds. Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. New York (NY): Manchester University Press; 1989:187–204
   Google Scholar
• Fritz J, Irrgang J. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther 2001;81:667–778
   Google Scholar
• Vigatto R, Alexandre N, Filho H. Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2007;32:481–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakut E, Duger T, Oksuz C, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine 2009;29:581–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar