Utility of the Community Integration Questionnaire in a sample of adults with neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders receiving prevocational training

References

• World Health Organization. International classification of impairment, disabilities, and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1993
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Levak W, McPherson K, McNaughton H. Success in the workplace following traumatic brain injury: are we evaluating what is most important? Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:290–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reistetter TA, Abreu BC. Appraising evidence on community integration following brain injury: a systematic review. Occup Therap Int 2005;12:196–217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sander A, Clark A, Pappadis MR. What is community integration anyway? Defining meaning following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010;25:121–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, et al. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993;8:75–87
   Google Scholar
• Sander A, Fuchs KL, High WM Jr, et al. The Community Integration Questionnaire revisited: assessment of factor structure and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1303–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie L, Wright-StClair V, Keogh J, Gray M. Community integration after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of the clinical implications of measurement and service provision for older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:163–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalemans RJ, de Witte LP, Beurskens AJ, et al. Psychometric properties of the Community Integration Questionnaire adjusted for people with aphasia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:395–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalemans RJ, de Witte LP, Lemmens J, et al. Measures for rating social participation in people with aphasia: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:542–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M, Nissim EN, Wood K, Tulsky D. Objective and subjective handicap following spinal cord injury: interrelationships and predictors. J Spinal Cord Med 2002;25:11–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McVeigh SA, Hitzig SL, Craven BC. Influence of sport participation on community integration and quality of life: a comparison between sport participants and non-sport participants with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2009;32:115–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratz AL, Chadd E, Jensen MP, et al. An examination of the psychometric properties of the community integration questionnaire (CIQ) in spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2015;38:446–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gontkovsky ST, Russum P, Stokic DS. Comparison of the CIQ and chart short form in assessing community integration in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: a pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation 2009;24:185–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Slot WM, Roebroeck ME, Landkroon AP, et al. Everyday physical activity and community participation of adults with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:179–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehde DM, Osborne TL, Hanley MA, et al. The scope and nature of pain in persons with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis 2006;12:629–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauser DR, Wagner S, Wong AW. Enhancing psychosocial outcomes for young adult childhood CNS cancer survivors: importance of addressing vocational identity and community integration. Int J Rehabil Res 2012;35:311–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh AT, Braden AL, Craggs JG, Jensen MP. Psychometric properties of the Community Integration Questionnaire in a heterogeneous sample of adults with physical disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:1602–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla D, Devi B, Agrawal A. Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011;113:435–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan CP. The community integration questionnaire with new scoring guidelines: concurrent validity and need for appropriate norms. Brain Injury 2001;15:725–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Relationships between personality disorders, social disturbances and physical disability following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1987;2:57–69
   Google Scholar
• Kay T, Cavallo M, Ezrachi O, Vavagiakis P. The head injury family interview: a clinical and research tool. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1995;10:12–31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, deBoer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Measuring the long-term outcomes of traumatic brain injury: a review of the Community Integration Questionnaire. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1997;12:74–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers DP, Kendall M, Fleming J, Tate R. Comparison of the Sydney Psychological Reintegration Scale (SPRS) with the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ): psychometric properties. Brain Injury 2004;18:161–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lequetica AH, Chiaravalloti ND, Sander AM, et al. The Community Integration Questionnaire: Factor structure across racial/ethnic groups in persons with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2013;28:E14–E22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt MF, Garvin LJ, Heinemann AW, et al. Gender- and age-related role changes following brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1995;10:14–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The Community Integration Questionnaire: a comparative examination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:103–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar