Service user involvement in methadone maintenance programmes: The ‘philosophy, the ideal and the reality’

References

• Berridge V. Harm minimisation and public health: An historical perspective. Psychoactive drugs and harm reduction: From faith to science, N Heather, A Wodak, E Nadelmann, P O’Hare. Whurr Publishers, London 1993; 55–64
   Google Scholar
• Branfield F, Beresford P, Andrews E, Chambers P, Staddon P, Wise G, Williams-Finlay B. Making user involvement work: Supporting service user networking and knowledge. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York 2006
   Google Scholar
• Bryant J, Saxon M, Madden A, Bath N, Robinson S. Consumer participation in the planning and delivery of drug treatment services: The current arrangements. Drug and Alcohol Review 2008a; 27: 130–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant J, Saxon M, Madden A, Bath N, Robinson S. Consumers and providers perspectives about consumer participation in drug treatment services: Is there support to do more? What are the obstacles?. Drug and Alcohol Review 2008b; 27: 138–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler S. Alcohol, drugs and health promotion in modern Ireland. IPA, Dublin 2002
   Google Scholar
• Butler S, Mayock P. An Irish solution to an Irish problem: Harm reduction and ambiguity in the drug policy of the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Drug Policy 2005; 16: 415–422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr J, Matheson D, Tipene-Leach D. The public health response to hard to reach population. Oxford handbook of public health practice (2nd ed., pp. 266–275). , D Pencheon, C Guest, D Melzer, JA Muir Gray. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006
   Google Scholar
• Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs (2007). National Drug Strategy 2001–2008 Rehabilitation. Report of the working group on drugs rehabilitation, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Children. Quality and fairness: A health system for you. Stationery Office, Dublin 2001
   Google Scholar
• Department of Tourism, Sport and Recreation. Building on experience: National drugs strategy 2001–2008. Stationery Office, Dublin 2001
   Google Scholar
• Diamond B, Parkin G, Morris K, Bettinis J, Bettesworth C. User involvement: Substance or spin?. Journal of Mental Health 2003; 12: 613–626
   Google Scholar
• Fischer J, Neale J. Involving drug users in treatment decisions: An exploration of potential problems. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2008; 15: 161–175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer J, Jenkins N, Bloor M, Neale J, Berney L. Drug user involvement in treatment decisions. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York 2007
   Google Scholar
• Fry C, Treloar C, Maher L. Ethical challenges and responses in harm reduction research: Promoting applied communitarian ethics. Drug and Alcohol Review 2005; 24(50)449–459
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hathaway A. Shortcomings of harm reduction: Toward a morally invested drug reform strategy. International Journal of Drug Policy 2001; 12(2)125–137
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunt N. Public health or human rights: What comes first. International Journal of Drug Policy 2004; 15(4)231–237
   Google Scholar
• Keane H. Critiques of harm reduction, morality and the promise of human rights. International Journal of Drug Policy 2003; 14: 227–232
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann H, Hunt G. Drug treatment systems in an international perspective: Drugs, demons, and delinquents. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Lammers J, Happell B. Consumer participation in mental health services: Looking from a consumer perspective. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2003; 10: 385–392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacCoun RJ. Toward a psychology of harm reduction. American Psychologist 1998; 53(11)1199–1208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlatt GA. Basic principles and strategies of harm reduction. Harm reduction: Pragmatic strategies for managing high-risk behaviour, GA Marlatt. The Guilford Press, New York, NY 1998; 49–66
   Google Scholar
• Newman J, Vidler E. Discriminating customers, responsible patients, empowered users: Consumerism and the modernisation of health care. Journal of Social Policy 2006; 35: 193–209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinarman C. Public health and human rights: The virtues of ambiguity. International Journal of Drug Policy 2004; 15: 239–241
   Google Scholar
• Ridley J, Jones L. User and public involvement in health services: A literature review. Partners in Change, Edinburgh 2002
   Google Scholar
• Riley D, O’Hare P. Harm reduction: History, definition, and practice. Harm reduction: National and international perspectives, J Incardi, L Harrison. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 2000; 1–26
   Google Scholar
• Schulte S, Moring J, Meier PS, Barrowclough C. User involvement and desired service developments in drug treatment services: Service user and providers views. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2007; 14: 277–287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimson G. Harm reduction – coming of age: A local movement with global impact. International Journal of Drug Policy 2007; 18: 67–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidler E, Clarke J. Creating citizen-consumers: New labour and the remaking of public services. Public Policy and Administration 2005; 20(2)19–37
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (1978). Primary Health Care (Report of the International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, September 6–12 1978, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Ottawa charter for health promotion. Geneva 1986
   Google Scholar