Acceptance of illicit drug use in the Netherlands and Norway: A cross-national survey

References

• Best SJ, Krueger B, Hubbard C, Smith A. An assessment of the generalizability of Internet surveys. Social Science Computer Review 2001; 19: 131–145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongers IMB, van de Goor LAM, Garretsen HFL. Social climate on alcohol in Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Public opinion on drinking behaviour and alcohol control measures. Alcohol and Alcoholism 1998; 33: 141–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen JW. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences2nd. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 1988
   Google Scholar
• Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method2nd. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, NY 2007
   Google Scholar
• Duff C. Party drugs and party people: Examining the ‘normalization’ of recreational drug use in Melbourne, Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy 2005; 16: 161–170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garretsen HFL. The Dutch and their drugs: The end of an era? Reflections on Dutch policies towards tobacco, alcohol and illegal drugs. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2010; 17: 485–495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesbrecht N, Greenfield TK. Public opinions on alcohol policy issues: A comparison of American and Canadian surveys. Addiction 1999; 94: 521–531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesbrecht N, Ialomiteanu A, Anglin L. Drinking patterns and perspectives on alcohol policy: Results from two Ontario surveys. Alcohol and Alcoholism 2005; 40: 132–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibell B, Guttormsson, U., Ahlström, S., Balakireva, O., Bjarnason, T., Kokkevi, A., & Kraus, L. (2009). The 2007 ESPAD report. Substance use among students in 35 European countries. The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs, Stockholm, Sweden: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)
   Google Scholar
• Holmila M, Mustonen H, Österberg E, Raitasalo K. Public opinion and community-based prevention of alcohol-related harms. Addiction Research and Theory 2009; 17: 360–371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korf DJ, Riper H, Bullington B. Windmills in their minds?: Drug policy and drug research in the Netherlands. Journal of Drug Issues 1999; 29: 451–472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine HG. Global drug prohibition: Its uses and crises. International Journal of Drug Policy 2003; 14: 145–153
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart A. Comparative politics and the comparative method. The American Political Science Review 1971; 65: 682–693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health Welfare and Sports. Drug policy in the Netherlands: Basic principles and enforcement in practice. Ministry of Health Welfare and Sports, The Hague 2003
   Google Scholar
• National Government of The Netherlands (2011). http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/drugs/vraag-en-antwoord/ben-ik-strafbaar-als-ik-drugs-bezit-gebruik-produceer-of-verhandel.html. Retrieved from http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/drugs
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (2005). The drug situation in Norway 2005. Annual report to the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction–EMCDDA. Oslo: SIRUS
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Health Care Services (2009). Norwegian drug policy in international flora. Memorandum. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/HOD/Dokumenter%20FHA/SAN/Narko%20eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ødegård E. Comparative research in the drug field. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 1998; 6: 357–367
   Google Scholar
• Parker H. Normalization as a barometer: Recreational drug use and the consumption of leisure by younger Britons. Addiction Research and Theory 2005; 13: 205–215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker HJ, Aldridge J, Measham F. Illegal leisure: The normalization of adolescent recreational drug use. Routledge, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Parker H, Williams L, Aldridge J. The normalization of 'Sensible' recreational drug use: Further evidence from the north west England longitudinal study. Sociology 2002; 36: 941–964
   Google Scholar
• Rodenburg G, Spijkerman, R., van den Eijnden, R., & van de Mheen, D. (2007). Nationaal Prevalentie Onderzoek Middelengebruik 2005 [National Prevalence Survey Substance Use 2005]. Rotterdam: IVO
   Google Scholar
• Room R, Graves K, Giesbrecht N, Greenfield T. Trends in public opinion about alcohol policy initiatives in Ontario and the US 1989–1991. Drug and Alcohol Review 1995; 14: 35–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiner M, Newburn T. Definitely, maybe not? The normalisation of recreational drug use amongst young people. Sociology 1997; 31: 511–529
   Google Scholar
• Skretting A, & Storvoll, E.E. (Eds.). (2011). Utviklingstrekk på rusmiddelfeltet. Grunnlagsmateriale til regjeringens stortingsmelding om rusmiddelpolitikken [Developmental trends in the drug field. Documentation for the Government's white paper on drug policy]. Oslo: SIRUS
   Google Scholar
• Sznitman SR. An examination of the normalisation of cannabis use among 9th grade school students in Sweden and Switzerland. Addiction Research and Theory 2007; 15: 601–616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Sar R, Brouwers EPM, van de Goor LAM, Garretsen HFL. The opinion on Dutch cannabis policy measures: A cross-sectional survey. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2011; 18: 161–171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibberley JF, Price C. Young people's drug use: Facts and feelings—Implications for the normalization debate. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2000; 7: 147–162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright KB. Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2005; 10: article 11., Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/wright.html
   Google Scholar