Understanding the science–policy nexus in Belgium: An analysis of the drug policy debate (1996–2003)

References

• Boland P. British drugs policy: Problematizing the distinction between legal and illegal drugs and the definition of the drugs problem. Probation Journal 2008; 55: 171–187
   Google Scholar
• Burchell G, Foucault M. The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Caplan N. The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. American Behavioral Scientist 1979; 22: 459–470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carden F. Issues in assessing the policy influence of research. International Social Science Journal 2004; 56: 135–151
   Google Scholar
• De Ruyver B, Casselman J, Meuwissen K, Bullens F, van Impe K. Het Belgisch drugbeleid anno 2000: Een stand van zaken drie jaar na de aanbevelingen van de parlementaire werkgroep drugs. Onderzoeksgroep Drugbeleid, Strafrechtelijk beleid en Internationale criminaliteit, Gent 2000
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough N. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Guillain C. La politique pénale du gouvernement arc-en-ciel en matière de drogues. CRISP, Bruxelles 2003
   Google Scholar
• Guillain C, Marchand C. La réglementation du cannabis à la lumière des conventions internationales. La politique en matière de drogues en Belgique: Développements actuels, B De Ruyver, P De Somere, G Vermeulen, A Noirfalise, C Figiel. Bruylant-Maklu, Bruxelles 1998; 299–318
   Google Scholar
• Hajer M. The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1995
   Google Scholar
• Hall W. The contribution of research to the development of national cannabis policy in Australia. Addiction 2008; 103: 712–720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes CE. Evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence? The role of evidence in the development and implementation of the Illicit Drug Diversion Initiative. Drug and Alcohol Review 2007; 26: 363–368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes CE, Stevens A. A resounding success or a disastrous failure: Re-examining the interpretation of evidence on the Portuguese decriminalisation of illicit drugs. Drug and Alcohol Review 2012; 31: 101–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff S, (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Kaminski D. Les directives de politique criminelles en matière de stupéfiants. L’usage pénal des drogues, D Kaminski. De Boeck and Larcier, Bruxelles 2003; 107–140
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Longmans, London 2002
   Google Scholar
• Landry R, Amara N, Lamari M. Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy 2001; 30: 333–349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry R, Lamari M, Amara N. Extent and determinants of utilization of university research in government agencies. Public Administration Review 2003; 63: 193–205
   Google Scholar
• Lenton S. Pot, politics and the press – Reflections on cannabis law reform in Western Australia. Drug and Alcohol Review 2004; 23: 223–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom CE. Science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review 1959; 19: 79–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCoun RJ, Reuter P. Interpreting Dutch cannabis policy: Reasoning by analogy in the legalisation debate. Science 1997; 278: 47–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor S, (2012). Barriers to the influence of evidence on policy: Are politicians the problem? Paper presented at the International Society for the Study of Drug Policy, Canterbury
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan M. The complexity of evidence: Reflections on research utilization in a heavily politicised policy area. Social Policy and Society 2009; 9: 1–12
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan M. Evidence versus politics. Exploiting research in UK drug policy making?. Policy Press, Bristol 2011
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan M, Pawson R, Wicker K. The precautionary principle and evidence-based policy. Evidence and Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 2012; 8: 171–191
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer L, (2004). A critical review of evidence-based policy making. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute
   Google Scholar
• Rich RF. Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outcomes. Knowledge and Policy 1997; 10: 11–24
   Google Scholar
• Ritter A. How do drug policy makers access research evidence?. International Journal of Drug Policy 2009; 20: 70–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter A, Lancaster K. Measuring research influence on drug policy: A case example of two epidemiological monitoring systems. International Journal of Drug Policy 2013; 24: 30–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe EM. Development narratives, or making the best of blueprint development. World Development 1991; 19: 287–300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Room R, Fischer B, Hall W, Lenton S, Reuter P. Cannabis Policy: Moving beyond stalemate. Oxford University Press, New York, NY 2010
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier PA. The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 1998; 5: 98–130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolnikoff EB. The role of science in policy. The climate change debate in the United States. Environment 1999; 41: 16–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens A. Survival of the ideas that fit: An evolutionary analogy for the use of evidence in policy. Social Policy and Society 2007; 6: 25–35
   Google Scholar
• Stevens A. Drugs, crime and public health: The political economy of drug policy. Routledge, London 2011
   Google Scholar
• Vuillaume D. Changing scientific perspectives on cannabis use. Cannabis in Europe: Dynamics in perception, policy and markets, D Korf. Pabst Science, Lengerich 2008; 15–29
   Google Scholar
• Weiss CH. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review 1979; 39: 426–431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss CH, (2001). What kind of evidence in evidence-based policy? Paper presented at the International Inter-disciplinary Evidenced-Based Policies and Indicator Systems Conference, London
   Google Scholar
• Weiss CH, Murphy-Graham E, Petrosino A, Gandhi AG. The fairy godmother—and her warts making the dream of evidence-based policy come true. American Journal of Evaluation 2008; 29: 29–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell M, Taylor, S., & Yates, S.J. (Eds.). (2008). Discourse as data. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Wodak R, Meyer M. Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage, London 2001
   Google Scholar