New psychoactive substances and British drug policy: A view from the cyber-psychonauts

References

• Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2003). Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard-to-involve internet users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 185–210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barratt, M.J. (2011) Discussing illicit drugs in public internet forums: Visibility, stigma, and pseudonymity. In Kjeldskov, J., & Paay, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, 29 June 2011 (pp. 159–168). Brisbane: Association for Computing Machinery
   Google Scholar
• Barratt, M.J., & Lenton, S. (2010). Beyond recruitment? Participatory online research with people who use drugs. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 3, 69–84
   Google Scholar
• Birdwell, J., Chapman, J., & Singleton, N. (2011). Taking Drugs Seriously: A demos and UK drug policy commission report on legal highs. Retrieved from www.ukdpc.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Carhart-Harris, R.L., King, L.A., & Nutt, D.J. (2011). A web-based survey on mephedrone. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 118, 19–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caulkins, J., Reuter, P., Iguchi, M.Y., & Chebea, J. (2005). How goes the ‘war on drugs’: An assessment of US problems and policy. Retrieved from www.rand.org
   Google Scholar
• Coomber, R. (1997). Using the internet for survey research. Sociological Research Online 2
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, P.W., Kuwabara, S.A., & O’Shaughnessy, J. (2009). The public stigma of mental illness and drug addiction: Findings from a stratified random sample. Journal of Social Work, 9, 139–147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A.M. (2008). Making drug control ‘fit for purpose’: Building on the UNGASS decade. Retrieved from www.unodc.org
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, C., & Caulkins, J.P. (2011). Scheduling of newly emerging drugs: A critical review of decisions over 40 years. Addiction, 107, 766–773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darke, S., & Torok, M. (2013). Attitudes of regular injecting drug users towards the legal status of the major illicit drugs. Drug and Alcohol Review, 32, 483–488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decorte, T. (2001). ‘Drug users' perceptions of ‘controlled' and ‘uncontrolled' use'. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 297–320
   Google Scholar
• EMCDDA. (2012). Annual Report 2012: The state of the drugs problem in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.emcdda.europa.eu
   Google Scholar
• EMCDDA’s (Eds.). (2010). Harm Reduction: Evidence, impacts and challenges. Retrieved from www.emcdda.europa.eu
   Google Scholar
• EMCDDA & Europol. (2012). New drugs in Europe, 2012. Retrieved from www.emcdda.europa.eu
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Towards a stronger European Drug Policy. Brussels: COM, 689 final
   Google Scholar
• Global Commission on Drug Policy. (2011). ‘War on Drugs’ report of the Global Commission on Drug Policy. Retrieved from www.globalcommissiondrugs.org
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, R. (2010). Letters to the editor: Dangers of banning spice and the synthetic cannabinoid agonists. Addiction, 105, 373–375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B., & Winstock, A.R. (2011). Controlling new drugs under marketing regulations. Addiction, 107, 1894–1899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Narcotics Control Board [INCB]. (2011). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2011. Retrieved from www.unodc.org
   Google Scholar
• Jürgens, R. (2008). Nothing about us without us – greater meaningful involvement of people who use illegal drugs: A public health, ethical and human rights imperative. Retrieved from www.opensocietyfoundations.org
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K., Sutherland, R., & Ritter, A. (2014). Examining the opinions of people who use drugs towards drug policy in Australia. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 21, 93–101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K., Ritter, A., & Stafford, J. (2013). Public opinion and drug policy in Australia: Engaging the ‘affected community. Drug and Alcohol Review, 32, 60–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latkin, C., & Friedman, S. (2012). Drug use research: Drug users as subjects or agents of change. Substance Use and Misuse, 47, 598–599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenton, S., Boys, A., & Norcross, K. (1997). Raves, drugs and experiences: Drug use by a sample of people who attend raves in Western Australia. Addiction, 92, 1327–1337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenton, S. (2004). Pot, politics and the press – Reflections on cannabis law reform in Western Australia. Drug and Alcohol Review, 23, 223–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C. (2010). Sinning and sinned against: The stigmatisation of problem drug users. London: United Kingdom Drug Policy Commission
   Google Scholar
• McElrath, K., & O’Neill, C. (2011). Experiences with mephedrone pre-and post-legislative controls: Perceptions of safety and sources of supply. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22, 120–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measham, F. (2013). Social Issues in the use of novel psychoactive substances. In Dargan, P.I., & Wood, D.M. (Eds.), Novel psychoactive substances:Classification, pharmacology and toxicology. London: Academic Press
   Google Scholar
• Measham, F., Moore, K., & Østergaard, J. (2011a). Mephedrone, “bubble” and unidentified white powders: The contested identities of synthetic “legal highs”. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 11, 137–146
   Google Scholar
• Measham, F., Wood, D.M., Dargan, P., & Moore, K., (2011b). The rise in legal highs: Prevalence and patterns in the use of illegal drugs and first- and second-generation “legal highs” in South London gay dance clubs. Journal of Substance Use, 16, 263–272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measham, F., Moore, K., Newcombe, R., & Welch, Z. (2010). Tweaking, bombing, dabbing and stockpiling: The emergence of mephedrone and the perversity of prohibition. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 10, 14–21
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P.G., & Sønderlund, A.L. (2010). Using the internet to research hidden populations of drug users: A review. Addiction, 105, 1557–1567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P.G., Johnston, J., Mcelwee, P.R., & Noble, R. (2007). A pilot study using the internet to study patterns of drug use: Processes, findings and limitations. Drug and Alcohol Review, 26, 169–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miserez, B., Ayrton, O., & Ramsey, J. (2014). Analysis of purity and cutting agents in street mephedrone samples from South Wales. Forensic Toxicology, 32, 305–310
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C.J., Naranha, L.A., Muetzelfeldt, M., Fielding, A., & Curran, H.V. (2013). Harms and benefits associated with psychoactive drugs: Findings of an international survey of active drug users. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 27, 497–506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe R. (1999). Psychonautics: A model and method for exploring the subjective effects of psychoactive drugs. Liverpool: Newcombe, 3D Research Bureau
   Google Scholar
• Parker, H., Aldridge, J., & Measham, F. (1998). Illegal leisure: The normalization of adolescent recreational drug use. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Peretti-Watel, P. (2003). Heroin users as ‘folk devils’ and French publich attitudes toward public health policy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 14, 321–329
   Google Scholar
• Perrone, D., Helgeson, R.D., & Fischer, R.G. (2013). United States drug prohibition and legal highs: How drug testing may lead cannabis users to Spice. Drug Education, Prevention and Policy, 20, 216–224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, G., & Chatwin, C. (2011). Researching cannabis markets online: Some lessons from the virtual field. In Fountain, J., Asmussen Frank, V., & Korf, D. (Eds.), Messages, markets and methods. European perspectives on drugs. Legerich: Pabst Publications
   Google Scholar
• Reinarman, C., Cohen, P., & Kaal, H. (2004). The limited relevance of drug policy: Cannabis in Amsterdam and in San Francisco. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 836–842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, P. (2011). Options for regulating new psychoactive drugs: A review of recent experiences. London: UK Drug Policy Commission
   Google Scholar
• Seddon, T. (2014). Drug policy and global regulatory capitalism: The case of new psychoactive substances (NPS). International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 1019–1024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K., & Flatley, J. (2011). Drug misuse declared: Findings from the 2010/11 British Crime Survey. England and Wales London: HOSB, p. 12
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A., & Measham, F. (2014). The ‘drug policy ratchet’: Why do sanctions for new psychoactive substances typically only go up? Addiction, 109, 1226–1232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tackett-Gibson, M. (2008). Constructions of risk and harm in online discussions of ketamine use. Addiction, Research and Theory, 16, 245–257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tackett-Gibson, M. (2007). Voluntary use risk and online drug-use discourse. In Murguia, E., Tackett-Gibson, M., & Lessem’s, A. (Eds.), Real drugs in a virtual world. New York: Lexington Books
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Drug Policy Commission. (2010). Getting serious about stigma: The problem with stigmatising drug users. London: United Kingdom Drug Policy Commission
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime [UNODC]. (2013). The challenge of new psychoactive substances. Global Smart Programme. Vienna: UNODC
   Google Scholar
• van Hout, M.C., & Brennan, R. (2011). Bump and grind: An exploratory study of mephedrone users’ perceptions of sexuality and sexual risk. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 11, 93–103
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, C. (2014). A critical first assessment of the new pre-market approval regime for new psychoactive substances (NPS) in New Zealand. Addiction, 109, 1580–1586
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D.M., Measham, F., & Dargan, P.I. (2012). Our favourite drug: Prevalence of use and preference for mephedrone in the London night-time economy 1 year after control. Journal of Substance Use, 17, 91–97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar