Influence of mechanical agitation on the pH profile of total, soluble and insoluble filter paper activity of Hypocrea jecorina cellulase preparations

References

• Andreaus J, Campos R, Gubitz G, Cavaco-Paulo A. 2000. Influence of cellulases on indigo backstaining. Text Res J 70:628–632.
   Google Scholar
• Andreaus J, Filho EXF, Bon EPS. 2008. Biotechnology of Holocellulose-Degrading Enzymes. In: Hou CT, Shaw J-F (eds). Biocatalysis and Bioenergy. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 197–230.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo H, Bishop D, Cavaco-Paulo A. 2000. Effects of agitation level on the adsorption, desorption, and activities on cotton fabrics of full length and core domains of EGV (Humicola insolens) and CenA (Cellulomonas fimi). Enzym Microb Tech 27:325–329.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camassola M, De Bittencourt LR, Shenem NT, Andreaus J, Dillon AJP. 2004. Characterization of the cellulase complex of Penicillium echinulatum. Biocatal Biotransform 22:391–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaco-Paulo A. 1998. Mechanism of cellulase action in text processes. Carbohydr Polymer 37:273–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaco-Paulo A, Almeida L. 1994. Cellulase hydrolysis of cotton cellulose – the effects of mechanical action, enzyme concentration and dyed substrates. Biocatalysis 10:353–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaco-Paulo A, Almeida L, Bishop D. 1996. Effects of agitation and endoglucanase pretreatment on the hydrolysis of cotton fabrics by a total cellulase. Text Res J 66:287–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaco-Paulo A, Almeida L, Bishop D. 1998. Hydrolysis of cotton cellulose by engineered cellulases from trichoderma reesei. Text Res J 68:273–280.
   Google Scholar
• CavacoPaulo A, Cortez JZ, Almeida L. 1997. The effect of cellulase treatment in textile washing processes. J Soc Dyers Colour 113:218–222.
   Google Scholar
• Gama FM, Mota M. 1997a. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose.1. Relationship between kinetics and physico-chemical parameters. Biocatal Biotransform 15:221–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gama FM, Mota M. 1997b. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose.2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies on cellulase adsorption. Effect of the surfactant Tween 85. Biocatal Biotransform 15:237–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose TK. 1987. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikinheimo L, Buchert J, Miettinen-Oinonen A, Suominen P. 2000. Treating denim fabrics with Trichoderma reesei cellulases. Text Res J 70:969–973.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson J, Siika-aho M, Tenkanen M, Tjerneld F. 2002. Enzymatic properties of the low molecular mass endoglucanases Cel12A (EG III) and Cel45A (EG V) of Trichoderma reesei. J Biotechnol 99:63–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV. 2008. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35:377–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenting HBM, Warmoeskerken MMCG. Mechanism of interaction between cellulase action and applied shear force, an hypothesis. J Biotechnol 2001;89:217–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine SE, Fox JM, Blanch HW, Clark DS. A mechanistic model of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 2010;107:37–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lide DR. 2009. Handbook of chemistry and physics. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Martins LF, Kolling D, Camassola M, Dillon AJP, Ramos LP. 2008. Comparison of penicillium echinulatum and trichoderma reesei cellulases in relation to their activity against various cellulosic substrates. Bioresour Technol 99:1417–1424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller GL. 1959. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinovich ML, Melnick MS, Bolobova AV. 2002. The structure and mechanism of action of cellulolytic enzymes. Biochemistry-Moscow 67:850–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rau M, Heidemann C, Pascoalin AM, Filho EXF, Camassola M, Dillon AJP, Das Chagas CF, Andreaus J. 2008. Application of cellulases from acrophialophora nainiana and penicillium echinulatum in textile processing of cellulosic fibres. Biocatal Biotransform 26:383–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahlberg J, Johansson G, Pettersson G. 1993. Trichoderma- Reesei has no true exo-cellulase – all intact and truncated cellulases produce new reducing end groups on cellulose. Biochim Biophys Acta 1157:107–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teeri TT. 1997. Crystalline cellulose degradation: new insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases. Trends Biotechnol 15:160–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengerdy RP, Szakacs G. 2003. Bioconversion of lignocellulose in solid substrate fermentation. Biochem Eng J 13:169–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzanov T, Andreaus J, Guebitz G, Cavaco-Paulo A. 2003. Protein interactions in enzymatic processes in textiles. Electron J Biotechnol 6:313–321.
   Google Scholar
• Wada M, Ike M, Tokuyasu K. 2010. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose I is greatly accelerated via its conversion to the cellulose II hydrate form. Polymer Degrad Stabil 95:543–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood TM, Bhat KM. 1988. Methods for measuring cellulase activities. Meth Enzymol 160:87–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YHP, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR. 2006. Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv 24:452–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar