Is personalized medicine a dream or a reality?

References

• Carleton BC, Smith MA. Drug safety: side effects and mistakes or adverse reactions and deadly errors? BC Medical J 2006;48:329–33
   Google Scholar
• IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. The use of medicines in the United States: Review of 2011; 2012. Available from: http://www.imshealth.com/ims/Global/Content/Insights/IMS%20Institute%20for%20Healthcare%20Informatics/IHII_Medicines_in_U.S_Report_2011.pdf [last accessed 14 Jan 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Gong IY, Kim RB. Importance of pharmacokinetic profile and variability as determinants of dose and response to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Can J Cardiol 2013;29:S24–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly RA, Aggeler PM, Leong LS. Studies on the coumarin anticoagulant drugs: the pharmacodynamics of warfarin in man. J Clin Invest 1963;42:1542–51
   Google Scholar
• Lu MC. Antithrombotics, thrombolytics, antiplatelets, and coagulants. In: Lemke TL, Williams DA, eds. Foye’s Principles of Medicinal Chemistry. 7th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013:841–76
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly RA. Interaction of several coumarin compounds with human and canine plasma albumin. Mol Pharmacol 1971;7:209–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristol Myers Squibb Company. COUMADIN prescribing information. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/009218s107lbl.pdf. 2011 [last accessed 14 Jan 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Routledge PA, Chapman PH, Davies DM, Rawlins MD. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin at steady state. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1979;8:243–7
   Google Scholar
• Gong IY, Schwarz UI, Crown N, et al. Clinical and genetic determinants of warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during treatment initiation. PLoS One 2011;6:e27808
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gage BF, Eby C, Johnson JA, et al. Use of pharmacogenetic and clinical factors to predict the therapeutic dose of warfarin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008;84:326–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Yang J, Zhang H, Yang J. Prediction of warfarin maintenance dose in Han Chinese patients using a mechanistic model based on genetic and non-genetic factors. Clin Pharmacokinet 2013;52:567–81
   Google Scholar
• Perera MA, Cavallari LH, Limdi NA, et al. Genetic variants associated with warfarin dose in African–American individuals: a genome-wide association study. Lancet 2013;382:790–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez W, Gamazon ER, Aquino-Michaels K, et al. Ethnicity-specific pharmacogenetics: the case of warfarin in African Americans. Pharmacogenomics J 2014;14:223–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naud J, Nolin TD, Leblond FA, Pichette V. Current understanding of drug disposition in kidney disease. J Clin Pharmacol 2012;52:10S–22S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreisbach AW, Lertora JJ. The effect of chronic renal failure on hepatic drug metabolism and drug disposition. Semin Dial 2003;16:45–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott MJ, Zimmerman D, Holden RM. Warfarin anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review of bleeding rates. Am J Kidney Dis 2007;50:433–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinow ME, Garwood CL, Clemente JL, Whittaker P. Effect of chronic kidney disease on warfarin management in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic. J Manag Care Pharm 2011;17:523–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limdi NA, Limdi MA, Cavallari L, et al. Warfarin dosing in patients with impaired kidney function. Am J Kidney Dis 2010;56:823–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rettie AE, Wienkers LC, Gonzalez FJ, et al. Impaired (S)-warfarin metabolism catalysed by the R144C allelic variant of CYP2C9. Pharmacogenetics 1994;4:39–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furuya H, Fernandez-Salguero P, Gregory W, et al. Genetic polymorphism of CYP2C9 and its effect on warfarin maintenance dose requirement in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy. Pharmacogenetics 1995;5:389–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Andrea G, D’Ambrosio RL, Di Perna P, et al. A polymorphism in the VKORC1 gene is associated with an interindividual variability in the dose-anticoagulant effect of warfarin. Blood 2005;105:645–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlquist JF, Horne BD, Muhlestein JB, et al. Genotypes of the cytochrome p450 isoform, CYP2C9, and the vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 conjointly determine stable warfarin dose: a prospective study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2006;22:191–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz UI, Ritchie MD, Bradford Y, et al. Genetic determinants of response to warfarin during initial anticoagulation. N Engl J Med 2008;358:999–1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong IY, Tirona RG, Schwarz UI, et al. Prospective evaluation of a pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin loading and maintenance dose regimen for initiation of therapy. Blood 2011;118:3163–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook A, Schulman S, Witt DM, et al. Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012;141:e152S–84S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JA, Gong L, Whirl-Carrillo M, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guidelines for CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes and warfarin dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;90:625–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirmohamed M, Burnside G, Eriksson N, et al. A randomized trial of genotype-guided dosing of warfarin. N Engl J Med 2013;369:2294–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel SE, French B, Kasner SE, et al. A pharmacogenetic versus a clinical algorithm for warfarin dosing. N Engl J Med 2013;369:2283–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrold M. Antihyperlipoproteinemics and inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis. In: Lemke TL, Williams DA, eds. Foye's Principles of Medicinal Chemistry. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013:815–40
   Google Scholar
• Patel J, Abd T, Blumenthal RS, et al. Genetics and personalized medicine – a role in statin therapy? Curr Atheroscler Rep 2014;16:384
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joy TR, Hegele RA. Narrative review: statin-related myopathy. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:858–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasternak RC, Smith Jr SC, Bairey-Merz CN, et al. ACC/AHA/NHLBI Clinical Advisory on the Use and Safety of Statins. Stroke 2002;33:2337–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee E, Ryan S, Birmingham B, et al. Rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics in white and Asian subjects residing in the same environment. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;78:330–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AstraZeneca. CRESTOR Prescribing Information. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/021366s028s029lbl.pdf. 2013 [last accessed 14 Jan 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Hatanaka T. Clinical pharmacokinetics of pravastatin: mechanisms of pharmacokinetic events. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000;39:397–412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scripture CD, Pieper JA. Clinical pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001;40:263–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalliokoski A, Niemi M. Impact of OATP transporters on pharmacokinetics. Br J Pharmacol 2009;158:693–705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Group SC, Link E, Parish S, et al. SLCO1B1 variants and statin-induced myopathy – a genomewide study. N Engl J Med 2008;359:789–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi M, Pasanen MK, Neuvonen PJ. SLCO1B1 polymorphism and sex affect the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin but not fluvastatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006;80:356–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda K, Ieiri I, Yasuda K, et al. Effects of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 haplotype on pharmacokinetics of pravastatin, valsartan, and temocapril. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006;79:427–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwinyi J, Johne A, Bauer S, et al. Evidence for inverse effects of OATP-C (SLC21A6) 5 and 1b haplotypes on pravastatin kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2004;75:415–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGorter MK, Tirona RG, Schwarz UI, et al. Clinical and pharmacogenetic predictors of circulating atorvastatin and rosuvastatin concentrations in routine clinical care. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2013;6:400–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nies AT, Niemi M, Burk O, et al. Genetics is a major determinant of expression of the human hepatic uptake transporter OATP1B1, but not of OATP1B3 and OATP2B1. Genome Med 2013;5:1. doi: 10.1186/gm405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong IY, Kim RB. Impact of genetic variation in OATP transporters to drug disposition and response. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2013;28:4–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskitalo JE, Zolk O, Fromm MF, et al. ABCG2 polymorphism markedly affects the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009;86:197–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasman DI, Giulianini F, MacFadyen J, et al. Genetic determinants of statin-induced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction: the Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2012;5:257–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HK, Hu M, Lui S, et al. Effects of polymorphisms in ABCG2, SLCO1B1, SLC10A1 and CYP2C9/19 on plasma concentrations of rosuvastatin and lipid response in Chinese patients. Pharmacogenomics 2013;14:1283–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson B, Hu M, Lee VW, et al. ABCG2 polymorphism is associated with the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to rosuvastatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010;87:558–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey KM, Romaine SP, Jackson BM, et al. Hepatic metabolism and transporter gene variants enhance response to rosuvastatin in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the GEOSTAT-1 Study. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010;3:276–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskitalo JE, Pasanen MK, Neuvonen PJ, Niemi M. Different effects of the ABCG2 c.421C > A SNP on the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin. Pharmacogenomics 2009;10:1617–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho RH, Choi L, Lee W, et al. Effect of drug transporter genotypes on pravastatin disposition in European- and African-American participants. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2007;17:647–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsushima S, Maeda K, Kondo C, et al. Identification of the hepatic efflux transporters of organic anions using double-transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney II cells expressing human organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1)/multidrug resistance-associated protein 2, OATP1B1/multidrug resistance 1, and OATP1B1/breast cancer resistance protein. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2005;314:1059–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelissen IC, McLachlan AJ. The pharmacogenomics of statins. Pharmacol Res 2013. pii: S1043-6618(13)00269-7. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2013.12.002. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Lamba J, Hebert JM, Schuetz EG, et al. PharmGKB summary: very important pharmacogene information for CYP3A5. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2012;22:555–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangravite LM, Engelhardt BE, Medina MW, et al. A statin-dependent QTL for GATM expression is associated with statin-induced myopathy. Nature 2013;502:377–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fareed J, Jeske W, Thethi I. Metabolic differences of current thienopyridine antiplatelet agents. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2013;9:307–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibbing D, Morath T, Stegherr J, et al. Impact of proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel. Thromb Haemost 2009;101:714–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilard M, Arnaud B, Cornily JC, et al. Influence of omeprazole on the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel associated with aspirin: the randomized, double-blind OCLA (Omeprazole CLopidogrel Aspirin) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:256–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassen JA, Choudhry NK, Avorn J, Schneeweiss S. Cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients using clopidogrel with proton pump inhibitors after percutaneous coronary intervention or acute coronary syndrome. Circulation 2009;120:2322–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutz RP, Stanek EJ, Aubert R, et al. Impact of proton pump inhibitors on the effectiveness of clopidogrel after coronary stent placement: the clopidogrel Medco outcomes study. Pharmacotherapy 2010;30:787–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates ER, Lau WC, Angiolillo DJ. Clopidogrel-drug interactions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1251–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein JA, Ishizaki T, Chiba K, et al. Frequencies of the defective CYP2C19 alleles responsible for the mephenytoin poor metabolizer phenotype in various Oriental, Caucasian, Saudi Arabian and American black populations. Pharmacogenetics 1997;7:59–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desta Z, Zhao X, Shin JG, Flockhart DA. Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002;41:913–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim SC, Risinger C, Dahl ML, et al. A common novel CYP2C19 gene variant causes ultrarapid drug metabolism relevant for the drug response to proton pump inhibitors and antidepressants. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006;79:103–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KA, Park PW, Hong SJ, Park JY. The effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel: a possible mechanism for clopidogrel resistance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008;84:236–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umemura K, Furuta T, Kondo K. The common gene variants of CYP2C19 affect pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in an active metabolite of clopidogrel in healthy subjects. J Thromb Haemost 2008;6:1439–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong IY, Crown N, Suen CM, et al. Clarifying the importance of CYP2C19 and PON1 in the mechanism of clopidogrel bioactivation and in vivo antiplatelet response. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2856–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuldiner AR, O’Connell JR, Bliden KP, et al. Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy. JAMA 2009;302:849–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang JS, Cho KI, Jin HY, et al. Meta-analysis of cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among coronary artery disease patients of different ethnic groups treated with clopidogrel. Am J Cardiol 2012;110:502–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao L, Jian C, Changzhi L, et al. Cytochrome CYP2C19 polymorphism and risk of adverse clinical events in clopidogrel-treated patients: a meta-analysis based on 23 035 subjects. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2013;106:517–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JA, Roden DM, Lesko LJ, et al. Clopidogrel: a case for indication-specific pharmacogenetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012;91:774–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Stein CM, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy: 2013 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2013;94:317–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MD, Zuo H, Lee KH, et al. Pharmacological characterization of 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl tamoxifen, a novel active metabolite of tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004;85:151–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stearns V, Johnson MD, Rae JM, et al. Active tamoxifen metabolite plasma concentrations after coadministration of tamoxifen and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:1758–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teft WA, Gong IY, Dingle B, et al. CYP3A4 and seasonal variation in vitamin D status in addition to CYP2D6 contribute to therapeutic endoxifen level during tamoxifen therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;139:95–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Desta Z, Stearns V, et al. CYP2D6 genotype, antidepressant use, and tamoxifen metabolism during adjuvant breast cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:30–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges S, Desta Z, Li L, et al. Quantitative effect of CYP2D6 genotype and inhibitors on tamoxifen metabolism: implication for optimization of breast cancer treatment. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006;80:61–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly CM, Juurlink DN, Gomes T, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and breast cancer mortality in women receiving tamoxifen: a population based cohort study. BMJ 2010;340:c693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dezentje VO, van Blijderveen NJ, Gelderblom H, et al. Effect of concomitant CYP2D6 inhibitor use and tamoxifen adherence on breast cancer recurrence in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2423–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachse C, Brockmoller J, Bauer S, Roots I. Cytochrome P450 2D6 variants in a Caucasian population: allele frequencies and phenotypic consequences. Am J Hum Genet 1997;60:284–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdter TE, Schroth W, Bacchus-Gerybadze L, et al. Activity levels of tamoxifen metabolites at the estrogen receptor and the impact of genetic polymorphisms of phase I and II enzymes on their concentration levels in plasma. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;89:708–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz MP, Suman VJ, Hoskin TL, et al. CYP2D6 metabolism and patient outcome in the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group trial (ABCSG) 8. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:500–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan MM, Leyland-Jones B, Bouzyk M, et al. CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen response in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: the breast international group 1–98 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012;104:441–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyotani K, Mushiroda T, Nakamura Y, Zembutsu H. Pharmacogenomics of tamoxifen: roles of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2012;27:122–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Province MA, Goetz MP, Brauch H, et al. CYP2D6 genotype and adjuvant tamoxifen: meta-analysis of heterogeneous study populations. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2014;95:216–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyotani K, Mushiroda T, Zembutsu H, Nakamura Y. Important and critical scientific aspects in pharmacogenomics analysis: lessons from controversial results of tamoxifen and CYP2D6 studies. J Hum Genet 2013;58:327–33
   Google Scholar
• Teft WA, Mansell SE, Kim RB. Endoxifen, the active metabolite of tamoxifen, is a substrate of the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (multidrug resistance 1). Drug Metab Dispos 2011;39:558–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iusuf D, Teunissen SF, Wagenaar E, et al. P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) transports the primary active tamoxifen metabolites endoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen and restricts their brain penetration. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2011;337:710–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan R, Higgins CF. Interaction of tamoxifen with the multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein. Br J Cancer 1995;71:294–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyotani K, Mushiroda T, Imamura CK, et al. Significant effect of polymorphisms in CYP2D6 and ABCC2 on clinical outcomes of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1287–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annas GJ, Elias S. 23andMe and the FDA. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:985–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R, Mias GI, Li-Pook-Than J, et al. Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes. Cell 2012;148:1293–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusko WJ, Ko HC, Ebling WF. Convergence of direct and indirect pharmacodynamic response models. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1995;23:5–8; discussion 9–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar