Linear low-dose extrapolation for noncancer health effects is the exception, not the rule

References

• Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (2007). Toxicological Profile for Arsenic (Final). 559 p. Available at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp2.pdf. Accessed on 14 November, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Albert RE. (1994). Carcinogen risk assessment in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Crit Rev Toxicol 24(1):75–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aldridge WN. (1986). The biological basis and measurement of thresholds. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 26:39–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). (2006). 2006 TLVs and BEIs: Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). 228 p.
   Google Scholar
• Barton HA, Andersen ME, Clewell HJ. (1998). Harmonization: Developing consistent guidelines for applying mode of action and dosimetry information to cancer and noncancer risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 4(1):75–115.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdanffy MS, Daston G, Faustman EM, Kimmel CA, Kimmel GL, Seed J, Vu V. (2001). Harmonization of cancer and noncancer risk assessment: Proceedings of a consensus-building workshop. Toxicol Sci 61:18–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer M, Brumm J, Vedal S, Petkau AJ. (2002). Exposure misclassification and threshold concentrations in time series analyses of air pollution health effects. Risk Anal 22(6):1183–1193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burke TA, Dominici F, Fox M, White RH, Cote I, Burke TA, Hattis DB, Samet JM, White PD, Zeise L. (2009). Linear low-dose extrapolation for noncancer responses: Burke et al. respond Letter. Environ Health Perspect 117(4):A142–A143.
   Google Scholar
• Cakmak S, Burnett RT, Krewski D. (1999). Methods for detecting and estimating population threshold concentrations for air pollution-related mortality with exposure measurement error. Risk Anal 19(3):487–496.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calabrese EJ, Baldwin LA. (2003). Hormesis: The dose-response revolution. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 43:175–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese EJ, Blain R. (2005). The occurrence of hormetic dose responses in the toxicological literature, the hormesis database: An overview. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 202(3):289–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell JP, Alvarez JA. (1989). Acute arsenic intoxication. Am Fam Physician 40(6):93–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA, Crainiceanu CM. (2006). Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective. (2nd edition). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Clark AJ. (1937). Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology: General Pharmacology (Excerpts). Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer, 1-17, 105–123.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen BL. (2002). Cancer risk from low-level radiation. Am J Roentgenol 179(5):1137–1143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conolly RB, Thomas RS. (2007). Biologically motivated approaches to extrapolation from high to low doses and the advent of systems biology: The road to toxicological safety assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 13:52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford M, Wilson R. (1996). Low-dose linearity: The rule or the exception? Human Ecol Risk Assessment 2:305–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump KS. (2005). The effect of random error in exposure measurement upon the shape of the exposure response. Dose Response 3:456–464.
   Google Scholar
• Crump KS, Hoel DG, Langley CH, Peto R. (1976). Fundamental carcinogenic processes and their implications for low dose risk assessment. Cancer Res 36:2973–2979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels MJ, Dominici F, Zeger SL, Samet JM. (2004). The National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study. Part III: PM10 Concentration-Response Curves and Thresholds for the 20 Largest US Cities. HEI Research Report 94 Part III. Boston, MA: Health Effects Institute (Boston, MA); HEI Research Report 94 Part III. 30p., May.
   Google Scholar
• Dourson M, Haber L. (2010). Linear low-dose extrapolation. In: Hsu C-H, Stedeford T, eds. Cancer Risk Assessment—Chemical Carcinogenesis, Hazard Evaluation, and Risk Quantification. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Ch. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Dourson M, Haber L. (2010). Linear low-dose extrapolation. In: Hsu C-H, Stedeford T, eds. Cancer Risk Assessment− —Chemical Carcinogenesis, Hazard Evaluation, and Risk Quantification. New York: John Wiley and Sons, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, DL, Gilbert, SG. (2008). Principles of toxicology. In: Casarett and Doull’’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons. (7th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo, MA. (2008). History and cscope of toxicology. In: Casarett and Doull’’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons. (7th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring PJ, Watanabe PG, Park CN. (1978). Resolution of dose-response toxicity data for chemicals requiring metabolic activation: Example—Vinyl chloride. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 44:581–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman JE, Dodge DG, Bailey LA. (2010). A framework for assessing causality and adverse effects in humans with a case study of sulfur dioxide. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 58:308–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattis D, Russ A, Goble R, Banati P, Chu M. (2001). Human interindividual variability in susceptibility to airborne particles. Risk Anal 21(4):585–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ideker T, Galitski T, Hood L. (2001). A new approach to decoding life: Systems biology. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2:343–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCS. (2009). Risk Assessment for Combined Exposures to Multiple Chemicals: A WHO/IPCS Framework. Draft. Available at: http://www.who.int/ipcs/methods/harmonization/areas/combinedexposure.pdf. Accessed on 3 December 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper RA, Rayes JR, Bogdanffy MS. (2007). Metabolism: A determination of toxicity. In: Hayes AW, ed. Principles and Methods of Toxicology. 5th edition. New York: Informa Healthcare, 103–178.
   Google Scholar
• Küchenhoff H, Carroll RJ. (1997). Segmented regression with errors in predictors: Semi-parametric and parametric methods. Stat Med 16(1-3):169–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuha J, Temple J. (2003). Covariate measurement error in quadratic regression. Int Stat Rev 71(1):131–150.
   Google Scholar
• Levin-Scherz JK, Patrick JD, Weber FH, Garabedian C. (1987). Acute arsenic ingestion. Ann Emerg Med 16(6):702–704.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lusis AJ. (2006). A thematic review series: Systems biology approaches to metabolic and cardiovascular disorders. J Lipid Res. 47(9):1887–1890.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lutz WK. (1990). Commentary: Dose-response relationship and low dose extrapolation in chemical carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 11(8):1243–1247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McClellan RO. (1999). Human health risk assessment: A historical overview and alternative paths forward. Inhal Toxicol 11:447–518.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan MG, Henrion M, Small M. (1990). Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Naciff JM, Hess KA, Overmann GJ, Torontali SM, Carr GJ, Tiesman JP, Foertsch LM, Richardson BD, Martinez JE, Daston GP. (2005). Gene expression changes induced in the testis by transplacental exposure to high and low doses of 17-ethynyl estradiol, genistein, or bisphenol A. Toxicol Sci 86(2):396–416.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (1977). Drinking Water and Health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (1983). Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (1996). Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2007a). Toxicity Testing in the Twenty-first Century: A Vision and a Strategy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2007b). Applications of Toxicogenomic Technologies to Predictive Toxicology and Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2008). Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment. Committee on Improving Risk Analysis Approaches Used by EPA. 36p., December 2.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2009). Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment. Committee on Improving Risk Analysis Approaches Used by the U.S. EPA. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parascandola J. (1981). The theoretical basis of Paul Ehrlich’s chemotherapy. J Hist Med Allied Sci 36: 19–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petito-Boyce C, Lewis AS, Sax SN, Eldan M, Cohen SM, Beck BD. (2008). Probabilistic analysis of human health risks associated with background concentrations of inorganic arsenic: Use of a margin of exposure approach. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 14:1159–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quatrehomme G, Ricq O, Lapalus P, Jacomet Y, Ollier A. (1992). Acute arsenic intoxication: Forensic and toxicologic aspects (an observation). J Forensic Sci 37(4):1163–1171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhomberg LR. (2004). Mechanistic considerations in the harmonization of dose-response methodology: The role of redundancy at different levels of biological organization. In: McDaniels T, Small MJ, eds. Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhomberg LR. (2010). Practical risk assessment and management issues arising were we to adopt low-dose linearity for all endpoints. Dose Response (in press).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodricks JV, Gaylor, DW, Turnbull D. (2007). Quantitative extrapolations in toxicology. In: Hayes AW, ed. Principles and Methods of Toxicology. 5th edition. New York: Informa Healthcare, 453–474.
   Google Scholar
• Sadava D, Berenbaum MR, Orians GH, Purves WK, Heller CH. (2009). Life: The Science of Biology. (9th edition). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, W.H. & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Samoli E, Analitis A, Touloumi G, Schwartz J, Anderson HR, Sunyer J, Bisanti L, Zmirou D, Vonk JM, Pekkanen J, Goodman P, Paldy A, Schindler C, Katsouyanni K. (2005). Estimating the exposure-response relationships between particulate matter and mortality within the APHEA multicity project. Environ Health Perspect 113(1):88–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz J. (2004). The effects of particulate air pollution on daily deaths: A multi-city case crossover analysis. Occup Environ Med 61(12):956–961.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz J, Zanobetti A. (2000). Using meta-smoothing to estimate dose-response trends across multiple studies, with application to air pollution and daily death. Epidemiology 11:666–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz J, Coull B, Laden F, Ryan L. (2008). The effect of dose and timing of dose on the association between airborne particles and survival. Environ Health Perspect 116:64–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sielken RL, Stevenson DE. (1998). Modeling to incorporate defense mechanisms into the estimation of dose responses. Environ Health Perspect 106(Suppl 1):341–348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simmons SO, Fan CY, Ramabhadran R. (2009). Cellular stress response pathway system as a sentinel ensemble in toxicological screening. Toxicol Sci 111(2):202–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stebbing AR. (2003). Adaptive responses account for the beta-curve-hormesis is linked to acquired tolerance. Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med 1(4):493–511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stebbing AR. (2009). Interpreting ‘‘dose-response’’ curves using homeodynamic data: With an improved explanation for hormesis. Dose Response 7(3):221–233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• US EPA. (1986). Guidelines for the health risk assessment of chemical mixtures. Federal Register 51(185):34014–34025.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. (2000). Supplementary Guidance for Conducting Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures. EPA/630/R-00/002. Washington, DC: US EPA; August.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. (2005). Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment (Final). Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC: Risk Assessment Forum. EPA/630/P-03/001B. Available at: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=116283. Accessed on 30 March, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. (2009). Integrated Science Assessment for Particulate Matter. Washington, DC: US EPA. EPA/600/R-08/139F. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ncea/pdfs/partmatt/Dec2009/PM_ISA_full.pdf. Accessed 3 February 2010.
   Google Scholar
• White RH, Cote I, Zeise L, Fox M, Dominici F, Burke TA, White PD, Hattis DB, Samet JM. (2009). State-of-the-Science Workshop Report: Issues and Approaches in Low Dose–Response Extrapolation for Environmental Health Risk Assessment. Available at: http://www.ehponline.org/members/2008/11502/11502.pdf. Accessed on 3 December 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Zeger SL, Thomas D, Dominici F, Samet JM, Schwartz J, Dockery D, Cohen A. (2000). Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: Concepts and consequences. Environ Health Perspect 108(5):419–426.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar