Prognostic impact of clinician-based interpretation of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography reports obtained in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

References

• Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2002;346:235–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feugier P, Van Hoof A, Sebban C, et al. Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:4117–4126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman JS, Francis IR, Kaminski MS, et al. Imaging of lymphoma with PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: correlation with CT. Radiology 1994;190:111–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thill R, Neuerburg J, Fabry U, et al.[Comparison of findings with 18-FDG PET and CT in pretherapeutic staging of malignant lymphoma]. Nuklearmedizin 1997;36:234–239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchmann I, Reinhardt M, Elsner K, et al. 2-(fluorine-18)fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the detection and staging of malignant lymphoma. A bicenter trial. Cancer 2001;91: 889–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, et al. Position emission tomography with or without computed tomography in the primary staging of Hodgkin's lymphoma. Haematologica 2006;91:482–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasnovas RO, Meignan M, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. SUVmax reduction improves early prognosis value of interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2011;118:37–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskowitz CH, Schoder H, Teruya-Feldstein J, et al. Risk-adapted dose-dense immunochemotherapy determined by interim FDG-PET in advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1896–1903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:579–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haioun C, Itti E, Rahmouni A, et al. [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome.Blood 2005;106:1376–1381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhaeel NG, Hutchings M, Fields PA, et al. FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2005;16:1514–1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings M, Mikhaeel NG, Fields PA, et al. Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET after two or three cycles of chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2005;16:1160–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhaeel NG, Timothy AR, O’Doherty MJ, et al. 18-FDG-PET as a prognostic indicator in the treatment of aggressive Non- Hodgkin's lymphoma-comparison with CT. Leuk Lymphoma 2000; 39:543–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashen AF, Dehdashti F, Luo J, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for early response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: poor predictive value of international harmonization project interpretation. J Nucl Med 2011;52:386–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meignan M, Haioun C, Itti E, et al. Value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in managing patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 2006;6:306–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin C, Itti E, Haioun C, et al. Early 18F-FDG PET for prediction of prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: SUV-based assessment versus visual analysis. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1626–1632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti E, Lin C, Dupuis J, et al. Prognostic value of interim 18F-FDG PET in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: SUV-based assessment at 4 cycles of chemotherapy. J Nucl Med 2009; 50:527–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Gingrich RD, Smith BJ, et al. 18-Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography report interpretation as predictor of outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma including analysis of “indeterminate” reports. Leuk Lymphoma 2010;51:439–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gang AO, Strom C, Pedersen M, et al. R-CHOEP-14 improves overall survival in young high-risk patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma compared with R-CHOP-14. A population-based investigation from the Danish Lymphoma Group.Ann Oncol 2012;23:147–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meignan M, Gallamini A, Meignan M, et al. Report on the First International Workshop on Interim-PET-Scan in Lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2009;50:1257–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Roux PY, Gastinne T, Le Gouill S, et al. Prognostic value of interim FDG PET/CT in Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with interim response-adapted strategy: comparison of International Harmonization Project (IHP), Gallamini and London criteria. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:1064–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrington SF, Qian W, Somer EJ, et al. Concordance between four European centres of PET reporting criteria designed for use in multicentre trials in Hodgkin lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37:1824–1833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggi A, Gallamini A, Chauvie S, et al. International validation study for interim PET in ABVD-treated, advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: interpretation criteria and concordance rate among reviewers. J Nucl Med 2013;54:683–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar