Stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders (report from an EBMT preceptorship meeting)

References

• Kyle RA, Durie BG, Rajkumar SV, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia. 2010;24:1121–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Avet-Loiseau H, Oliva S, et al. Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: a Report from International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2863–2869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel DS, Desikan KR, Mehta J, et al. Age is not a prognostic variable with autotransplants for multiple myeloma. Blood. 1999;93:51–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:91–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Cavallo F, Gay F, et al. Autologous transplantation and maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:895–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno B, Rotta M, Patriarca F, et al. A comparison of allografting with autografting for newly diagnosed myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1110–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan A, Pasquini MC, Ewell M, et al. Tandem autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplants (AuHCT) with or without maintenance therapy (auto-auto) versus single AuHCT followed by HLA matched sibling non- myeloablative allogeneic HCT (auto-allo) for patients with standard risk (SR) multiple myeloma (MM); results from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 0102 trial. Blood. 2010;116:24–25 (#41 abstr).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. Recent major improvement in long-term survival of younger patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008;111:2521–2526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1875–1883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koreth J, Cutler CS, Djulbegovic B, et al. High-dose therapy with single autologous transplantation versus chemotherapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (Review). Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:183–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahuerta JJ, Mateos MV, Martinez-López J, et al. Busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m2 versus melphalan 200 mg/m2 as conditioning regimens for autologous transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients included in the PETHEMA/GEM2000 study. Haematologica. 2010;95:1913–1920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musto P, Simeon V, Grossi A, et al. Predicting poor peripheral blood stem cell collection in patients with multiple myeloma receiving pre-transplant induction therapy with novel agents and mobilized with cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor: results from a Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell’Adulto Multiple Myeloma Working Party study. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivieri A, Marchetti M, Lemoli R, et al. Proposed definition of ‘poor mobilizer’ in lymphoma and multiple myeloma: an analytic hierarchy process by ad hoc working group Gruppo ItalianoTrapianto di Midollo Osseo. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012;47:342–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanza F, Lemoli RM, Olivieri A, et al. Factors affecting successful mobilization with plerixafor: an Italian prospective survey in 215 patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma. Transfusion. 2014;54:331–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Glasmacher A, et al. Tandem versus single autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:100–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs MJ, Davies GA, Chapman JA, et al. Thalidomide-prednisone maintenance following autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma: effect on thrombin generation and procoagulant markers in NCIC CTG MY.10. Br J Haematol. 2015;168:511–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC, et al. Lenalidomide after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1770–1781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Marit G, et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1782–1791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey EV, Dunn JA, Kanis JA, et al. Long-term follow-up of a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of clodronate in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2001;113:1035–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan GJ, Child JA, Gregory WM, et al. Effects of zoledronic acid versus clodronic acid on skeletal morbidity in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MRC Myeloma IX): secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:743–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garderet L, Iacobelli S, Moreau P, et al. Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone over the dual combination of thalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma progressing or relapsing after autologous transplantation: the MMVAR/IFM 2005-04 Randomized Phase III Trial from the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2475–2482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocio EM, Richardson PG, Rajkumar SV, et al. New drugs and novel mechanisms of action in multiple myeloma in 2013: a report from the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG). Leukemia. 2014;28:525–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1953–1959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonial S, Dimopoulos M, Palumbo A, et al. Elotuzumab therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:621–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanackovic D, Schilling G. Second autologous transplant as salvage therapy in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2013;163:565–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvares CL, Davies FE, Horton C, et al. The role of second autografts in the management of myeloma at first relapse. Haematologica. 2006;91:141–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook G, Williams C, Brown JM, et al. High-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation as consolidation therapy in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma after previous autologous stem-cell transplantation (NCRI Myeloma X Relapse [Intensive trial]): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:874–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroger N, Shimoni A, Schilling G, et al. Unrelated stem cell transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning for patients with multiple myeloma relapsing after autologous transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2010;148:323–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patriarca F, Einsele H, Spina F, et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma relapsed after autograft: a multicenter retrospective study based on donor availability. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18:617–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freytes CO, Vesole DH, Lerademacher J, et al. Second transplants for multiple myeloma relapsing after a previous autotransplant-reduced-intensity allogeneic vs autologous transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49:416–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Petrucci MT, et al. Intermediate-dose melphalan improves survival of myeloma patients aged 50 to 70: results of a randomized controlled trial. Blood. 2004;104:3052–3057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facon T, Mary JY, Hulin C, et al. Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99-06): a randomised trial. Lancet 2007;370:1209–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badros A, Barlogie B, Siegel E, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly multiple myeloma patients over the age of 70 years. Br J Haematol. 2001;114:600–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, et al. Impact of age and serum creatinine value on outcome after autologous blood stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;39:605–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantunen E, Itälä M, Siitonen T, et al. Blood stem cell mobilization and collection in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a nationwide analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008;41:239–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar SK, Dingli D, Lacy MQ, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation in patients of 70 years and older with multiple myeloma: results from a matched pair analysis. Am J Hematol. 2008;83:614–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muta T, Miyamoto T, Fujisaki T, et al. Evaluation of the feasibility and efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Intern Med. 2013;52:63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz M, Neben K, Raab MS, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation for elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:189–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auner HW, Szydlo R, Hoek J, et al. Trends in autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in Europe: increased use and improved outcomes in elderly patients in recent years. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50:209–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Zhang MJ, Zhong X, et al. Older patients with myeloma derive similar benefit from autologous transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20:1796–1803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Mateos MV, et al. Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: an International Myeloma Working Group report. Blood. 2015;125:2068–2074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahrton G, Iacobelli S, Björkstrand B, et al. Autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation vs autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma: long-term results of the EBMT-NMAM2000 study. Blood. 2013;121:5055–5063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björkstrand B, Iacobelli S, Hegenbart U, et al. Tandem autologous/reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem-cell transplantation versus autologous transplantation in myeloma: long-term follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3016–3022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armeson KE, Hill EG, Costa LJ. Tandem autologous vs autologous plus reduced intensity allogeneic transplantation in the upfront management of multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of trials with biological assignment. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:562–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger N, Badbaran A, Lioznov M, et al. Post-transplant immunotherapy with donor-lymphocyte infusion and novel agents to upgrade partial into complete and molecular remission in allografted patients with multiple myeloma. Exp Hematol. 2009;37:791–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladetto M, Ferrero S, Drandi D, et al. Prospective molecular monitoring of minimal residual disease after non-myeloablative allografting in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1038/leu.2015.269.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger N, Badbaran A, Zabelina T, et al. Impact of high-risk cytogenetics and achievement of molecular remission on long-term freedom from disease after autologous-allogeneic tandem transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19:398–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger N, Zabelina T, Klyuchnikov E, et al. Toxicity-reduced, myeloablative allograft followed by lenalidomide maintenance as salvage therapy for refractory/relapsed myeloma patients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:403–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneppers E, van der HB, Kersten MJ, et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma is not feasible: results of the HOVON 76 trial. Blood. 2011;118:2413–2419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsina M, Becker PS, Zhong X, et al. Lenalidomide maintenance for high-risk multiple myeloma after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20:1183–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caballero-Velázquez T, López-Corral L, Encinas C, et al. Phase II clinical trial for the evaluation of bortezomib within the reduced intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) and post-allogeneic transplantation for high-risk myeloma patients. Br J Haematol. 2013;162:474–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishihori T, Ochoa-Bayona JL, Kim J, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for consolidation of VGPR or CR for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:1179–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaccone L, Storer B, Patriarca F, et al. Long-term follow-up of a comparison of nonmyeloablative allografting with autografting for newly diagnosed myeloma. Blood. 2011;117:6721–6727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrero S, Drandi D, Mantoan B, et al. Minimal residual disease detection in lymphoma and multiple myeloma: impact on therapeutic paradigms. Hematol Oncol. 2011;29:167–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paiva B, Gutiérrez NC, Rosiñol L, et al. High-risk cytogenetics and persistent minimal residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry predict unsustained complete response after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2012;119:687–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladetto M, Brüggemann M, Monitillo L, et al. Next-generation sequencing and real-time quantitative PCR for minimal residual disease detection in B-cell disorders. Leukemia. 2014;28:1299–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Lopez J, Lahuerta JJ, Pepin F, et al. Prognostic value of deep sequencing method for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2014;123:3073–3079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paiva B, van Dongen JJ, Orfao A. New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2015;125:3059–3068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaccone L, Brunello L, Festuccia M, et al. Clinical impact of immunophenotypic remission after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50:511–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faham M, Zheng J, Moorhead M, et al. Deep-sequencing approach for minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2012;120:5173–5180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corradini P, Voena C, Tarella C, et al. Molecular and clinical remissions in multiple myeloma: role of autologous and allogeneic transplantation of hematopoietic cells. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:208–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corradini P, Cavo M, Lokhorst H, et al. Molecular remission after myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation predicts a better relapse-free survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2003;102:1927–1929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakkus MH, Bouko Y, Samson D, et al. Post-transplantation tumour load in bone marrow, as assessed by quantitative ASO-PCR, is a prognostic parameter in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2004;126:665–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenk R, Ak M, Kobbe G, et al. Levels of minimal residual disease detected by quantitative molecular monitoring herald relapse in patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2004;89:557–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladetto M, Pagliano G, Ferrero S, et al. Major tumor shrinking and persistent molecular remissions after consolidation with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with autografted myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2077–2084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palladini G, Hegenbart U, Milani P, et al. A staging system for renal outcome and early markers of renal response to chemotherapy in AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2014;124:2325–2332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dispenzieri A, Seenithamby K, Lacy MQ, et al. Patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation have superior outcomes compared with patients with multiple myeloma: a retrospective review from a tertiary referral center. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:1302–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cibeira MT, Sanchorawala V, Seldin DC, et al. Outcome of AL amyloidosis after high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation: long-term results in a series of 421 patients. Blood. 2011;118:4346–4352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönland SO, Lokhorst H, Buzyn A, et al. Allogeneic and syngeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with amyloid light-chain amyloidosis: a report from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood. 2006;107:2578–2584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonland SO, Kroger N, Wolschke C, et al. Donor lymphocyte infusions in amyloid light chain amyloidosis: induction of a “graft-versus-plasma cell-dyscrasia effect”. Haematologica. 2009;94:439–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Souza A, Lacy M, Gertz M, et al. Long-term outcomes after autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with POEMS syndrome (osteosclerotic myeloma): a single-center experience. Blood. 2012;120:56–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank C, Brown I, Peterson AC, et al. PD-L1/B7H-1 inhibits the effector phase of tumor rejection by T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic CD8 + T cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64:1140–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha A, Aoyama K, Taylor PA, et al. Host programmed death ligand 1 is dominant over programmed death ligand 2 expression in regulating graft-versus-host disease lethality. Blood. 2013;122:3062–3073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfall AL, Fraietta JA, Maus MV. Immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptors for multiple myeloma. Discov Med. 2014;17:37–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rapoport AP, Stadtmauer EA, Binder-Scholl GK, et al. NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-engineered T cells mediate sustained antigen-specific antitumor effects in myeloma. Nat Med. 2015;21:914–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfall AL, Maus MV, Hwang WT, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells against CD19 for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1040–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castella B, Riganti C, Fiore F, et al. Immune modulation by zoledronic acid in human myeloma: an advantageous cross-talk between Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, αβ CD8 + T cells, regulatory T cells, and dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2011;187:1578–1590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter DL, Levine BL, Kalos M, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:725–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochenderfer JN, Dudley ME, Feldman SA, et al. B-cell depletion and remissions of malignancy along with cytokine-associated toxicity in a clinical trial of anti-CD19 chimeric-antigen-receptor-transduced T cells. Blood. 2012;119:2709–2720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grupp SA, Kalos M, Barrett D, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1509–1518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casucci M, Nicolis di Robilant B, Falcone L, et al. CD44v6-targeted T cells mediate potent antitumor effects against acute myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma. Blood. 2013;122:3461–3472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenga H, Schaap N, Maas F, et al. Partial T cell-depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation following reduced-intensity conditioning creates a platform for immunotherapy with donor lymphocyte infusion and recipient dendritic cell vaccination in multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:320–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bringhen S, Petrucci MT, Larocca A, et al. Carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a multicenter, phase 2 study. Blood. 2014;124:63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet-Loiseau H, Leleu X, Roussel M, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone induction improves outcome of patients with t(4;14) myeloma but not outcome of patients with del(17p). J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4630–4634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar