SpermBlue®: A new universal stain for human and animal sperm which is also amenable to automated sperm morphology analysis

References

• Belletti ME, Melo ML (2004) Comparison between the toluidine blue stain and the Feulgen reaction for evaluation of rabbit sperm chromatin condensation and their relationship with sperm morphology. Theriogenology 62: 398–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorndahl L, Soderlund I, Kvist U (2003) Evaluation of the one-step eosin-nigrosin staining technique for human sperm vitality assessment. Hum. Reprod. 18: 813–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan PJ, Corselli JU, Jacobson JD, Patton WC, King A (1999) Spermac stain analysis of human sperm acrosomes. Fertil. Steril. 72: 124–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler JE, Painter CL, Adkinson RW, Memon MA, Hoyt PG (1988) Semen quality characteristics of dairy goats. J. Dairy Sci. 71: 1638–1646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie B (2000) Doctors revise Declaration of Helsinki. BMJ. 321: 913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coetzee K, Bermes N, Krause W, Menkveld R (2001) Comparison of normal sperm morphology outcomes from two different computer-assisted semen analysis systems. Andrologia 33: 159–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coetzee K, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ (1999) Repeatability and variance analysis on multiple computer-assisted (IVOS) sperm morphology readings. Andrologia 31: 163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Ghobashy AA, West CR (2003) The human sperm head: a key for successful fertilization. J. Androl. 24: 232–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enginsu ME, Dumoulin JCM, Pieters MHEC, Bras M, Evers JLH, Geraedts JPM (1991) Evaluation of human sperm morphology using strict criteria after Diff-Quik staining: correlation of morphology with fertilization in vitro. Hum. Reprod. 6: 854–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gago C, Pérez-Sánchez F, Yeung CH, Tablado L, Cooper TG, Soler C (1998) Standardization of sampling and staining methods for the morphometric evaluation of sperm heads in the Cynomolgus Monkey (Macaca fascicularis) using computer-assisted image analysis. Int. J. Androl. 21: 169–176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• García-Herreros M, Aparicio IM, Barón FJ, García-Marín LJ, Gil M (2006) Standardization of sample preparation, staining and sampling methods for automated sperm head morphometry analysis of boar spermatozoa. Int. J. Androl. 29: 553–563.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrett C, Baker GHW (1995) A new fully automated system for the morphometric analysis of human sperm heads. Fertil. Steril. 63: 1306–1317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravance CG, Champion ZJ, Casey PJ (1998) Computer-assisted sperm head morphometry analysis (ASMA) of cryopreserved ram spermatozoa. Theriogenology 49: 1219–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkel R, Schreiber G, Sturmhoefel A, Hipler U, Zermann DH, Menkveld R (2007) Comparison of three staining methods for the morphological evaluation of human spermatozoa. Fertil. Steril. 89: 449–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo M, Rodríguez I, Dorado J (2006) Influence of staining and sampling procedures on goat sperm morphometry using the Sperm Class Analyzer. Theriogenology 66: 996–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirai M, Boersma A, Hoeflich A, Wolf E, Föll J, Aumüller R, Braun J (2001) Objectively measured sperm motility and sperm head morphometry in boars (Sus scrofa): relation to fertility and seminal plasma growth factors. J. Androl. 22: 104–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jager S, Kuiken J, Kremer J (1984) Triple staining of human sperm: technical aspects. Arch. Androl. 12 Suppl:53–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jasko DJ, Lein DH, Foote RH (1990) The relationship between sperm morphological classification and fertility in the stallion. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 197: 389–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz DF, Overstreet JW, Samuels SJ, Niswander PW, Bloom TD, Lewis EL (1986) Morphometric analysis of spermatozoa in the assessment of human male fertility. J. Androl. 7: 203–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kruger TF, Ackerman SB, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Brugo SS, Acosta AA (1987) A quick, reliable staining technique for human sperm morphology. Arch. Androl. 18: 275–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehninger S (1988) Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 49: 112–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leubane-Janse van Rensburg TM (1998) What constitutes morphological normal and abnormal human sperm heads. PhD Thesis, Department of Physiological Sciences, University of the Western Cape, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Foote RH (1998) Bull sperm motility and membrane integrity in media varying in osmolality. J. Dairy Sci. 81: 1868–1873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukaszewicz E, Jerysz A, Partyka A, Siudzinska A (2008) Efficacy of evaluation of rooster sperm morphology using different staining methods. Res. Vet. Sci. 85: 583–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkveld R, El-Garem Y, Schill WB, Henkel R (2003) Relationship between human sperm morphology and acrosomal function. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet 20: 432–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkveld R, Stander FSH, Kotze TJW, Kruger TF, Van Zyl JA (1990) The evaluation of morphological characteristics according to stricter criteria. Hum. Reprod. 5: 586–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meschede D, Keck C, Zander M, Cooper TG, Yeung CH, Nieschlag E (1993) Influence of three different preparation techniques on the results of human sperm morphology analysis. Int. J. Androl. 16: 362–369.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mortimer D, Menkveld R (2001) Sperm morphology assessment: historical perspectives and current opinions. J. Androl. 22: 192–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oettle EE (1986) Using a new acrosome stain to evaluate sperm morphology. Vet. Med. 81: 263–265.
   Google Scholar
• Papanicolaou GN (1942) A new procedure for staining vaginal smears. Science 95: 438–439.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pérez-Sánchez F, de Monserrat JJ, Soler C (1994) Morphometric analysis of human sperm morphology. Int. J. Androl. 17: 248–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross KFA (1953) Cell shrinkage caused by fixative and paraffin-wax embedding in ordinary cytological preparations. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 94: 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Rutlland J, Pommer AC, Meyers SA (2003) Osmotic tolerance limits and properties of rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) spermatozoa. J. Androl. 24: 534–541.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saravia F, Núñez-Martínez I, Morán JM, Soler C, Muriel A, Rodríguez-Martínez H, Peña FJ (2007) Differences in boar sperm head shape and dimensions recorded by computer-assisted sperm morphometry are not related to chromatin integrity. Theriogenology 68: 196–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrader SM, Turner TW, Simon SD (1990) Longitudinal study of semen quality of unexposed workers: sperm head morphometry. J. Androl. 11: 32–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shorr E (1941) A new technique for staining vaginal smears. Ill: a single differential stain. Science 94: 545–546.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sousa APM, Tavares RS, De la Calle JFV, Figueiredo H, Almeida V, Almeida-Santos T, Ramalho-Santos J (2009) Dual use of Diff-Quik-like stains for the simultaneous evaluation of human sperm morphology and chromatin status. Hum. Reprod. 24: 28–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuset VM, Dietrich GJ, Wojtczak M, Slowinska M, De Monserrat J, Ciereszko A (2008) Comparison of three staining techniques for the morphometric study of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) spermatozoa. Theriogenology 69: 1033–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Horst G, Kitchin RM, Van der Horst M, Atherton RW (2009) The effect of the breeding season, cryopreservation and physiological extender on selected sperm and semen parameters of four ferret species: implications for captive breeding in the endangered black-footed ferret. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 21: 351–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO (1999) WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar