Reliability, Construct Validity and Measurement Potential of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Comprehensive Core Set for Chronic Widespread Pain

References

• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. WHO, Geneva, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Ewert T, Ustün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G: Development of ICF Core Sets for patients with chronic conditions. J Rehabil Med 44 (Suppl): 9–11, 2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grill E, Ewert T, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G: ICF Core Sets development for the acute hospital and early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 27: 361–366, 2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, Ustün TB, Stucki G: Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Rehabil Med 34: 205–210, 2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Stucki G, Weigl M, Kullmann L, Stoll T, Kamen L, Kostanjsek N, Walsh N: ICF Core Sets for chronic widespread pain. J Rehabil Med 44 (Suppl): 63–68, 2004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL, Tugwell P, et al: The American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria for the Classification of Fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 33: 160–172, 1990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J, Russell IJ, Herbert L: The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 38: 19–28, 1995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA, Gabriel S, et al: Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum 58: 26–35, 2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally JD, Matheson DA, Bakowsky VS: The epidemiology of self-reported fibromyalgia in Canada. Chronic Dis Can 27: 9–16, 2006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weir PT, Harlan GA, Nkoy FL, Jones SS, Hegmann KT, Gren LH, Lyon JL: The incidence of fibromyalgia and its associated comorbidities: a population-based retrospective cohort study based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes. J Clin Rheumatol 12: 124–128, 2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White KP, Speechley M, Harth M, Ostbye T: The London Fibromyalgia Epidemiology Study: direct health care costs of fibromyalgia syndrome in London, Canada. J Rheumatol 26: 885–889, 1999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger A, Dukes E, Martin S, Edelsberg J, Oster G: Characteristics and healthcare costs of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Int J Clin Pract 61: 1498–1508, 2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burckhardt CS, Clark BD, Bennett RM: The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire: development and validation. J Rheumatol 18: 728–733, 1991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michielsen HJ, De Vries J, Van Heck GL: Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure The Fatigue Assessment Scale. J Psychosom Res 54: 345–352, 2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett RM, Friend R, Jones KD, Ward R, Han BK, Ross RL: The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR): validation and psychometric properties. Arthritis Res Ther 11: R120–133, 2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe F, Rasker JJ: The Symptom Intensity Scale, fibromyalgia, and the meaning of fibromyalgia-like symptoms. J Rheumatol 33: 2291–2299, 2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salaffi F, Sarzi-Puttini P, Girolimetti R, Gasparini S, Atzeni F, Grassi W: Development and validation of the self-administered Fibromyalgia Assessment Status: a disease-specific composite measure for evaluating treatment effect. Arthritis Res Ther 11: R125–136, 2009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vallejo MA, Rivera J, Esteve-Vives J; Group ICAF: Development of a self-reporting tool to obtain a combined index of severity of fibromyalgia (ICAF). Health Qual Life Outcomes 8: 2–8, 2010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hieblinger R, Coenen M, Stucki G, Winkelmann A, Cieza A: Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for chronic widespread pain from the perspective of fibromyalgia patients. Arthritis Res Ther 11: R67, 2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prodinger B, Salzberger T, Stucki G, Stamm T, Cieza A: Measuring Functioning in People with Fibromyalgia (FM) Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-A Psychometric Analysis. Pain Pract 12: 255–265, 2012
   Google Scholar
• Tesio L, Simone A, Bernardinello M: Rehabilitation and outcome measurement: where is Rasch analysis-going? Eura Medicophys 43: 417–426, 2007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ware JJ, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 30: 473–483, 1992
   Google Scholar
• ICF-İşlevsellik, Yetiyitimi ve Sağlığın Uluslararası Sınıflandırması TC Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresi Başkanlığı, Çevirenler: Elif Kabakçı, Ahmet Göğüş, WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data, Bilge Matbaacılık: 2004
   Google Scholar
• Bennett R: The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ): a review of its development, current version, operating characteristics and uses. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23 (Suppl 39): S154–162, 2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarmer S, Ergin S, Yavuzer G: The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Rheumatol Int 20: 9–12, 2000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocyigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, Olmez N, Memis A: Kısa form-36 (KF-36)‘nın Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirligi ve geçerliliği. Romatizmal hastalığı olan bir grup hasta ile çalısma. Ilaç ve Tedavi Dergisi 2: 102–106, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Rasch G: Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1960
   Google Scholar
• Luce RD, Tukey JW: Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. J Math Psychol 1: 1–27, 1964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newby VA, Conner GR, Grant CP, Bunderson CV: The Rasch model and additive conjoint measurement. J Appl Meas 10: 348–354, 2009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrich D: Rasch Models for Measurement. Sage Publications, London, 1988
   Google Scholar
• Masters G: A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrica 47: 149–174, 1982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Conaghan PG: The Rasch Measurement Model in Rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum 57: 1358–1362, 2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve BB, Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Cook KF, Crane PK, Teresi JA, Thissen D, et al: Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Med Care 45(Suppl 1): 22–31, 2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais I, Andrich D: Formalising dimension and response violations of local independence in the unidimensional Rasch model. J Appl Meas 9: 200–215, 2008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wainer H, Kiely GL: Item clusters and computer adaptive testing: A case for testlets. J Educ Meas 24: 185–210, 1987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich D, Lyne A, Sheridan B, Luo G: RUMM 2030. Perth: RUMM Laboratory; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG: Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 310: 170, 1995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EV Jr: Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas 3: 205–231, 2002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teresi JA, Kleinman M, Ocepek-Welikson K: Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures. Stat Med 19: 1651–1683, 2000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher WP: Reliability statistics. Rasch Measure Trans 6: 238, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16: 297–334, 1951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 314: 572, 1997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC: Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM: Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measure Trans 7: 28, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Yanık B, Gökmen D, Sarp Ü, Kurtais Aytür Y, Ergin S: Ten year results of a fibromyalgia out-patient clinic: is there a happy ending? Turk J Rheumatol 26: 19–28, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Elhan AH, Küçükdeveci AA, Tennant A: The Rasch Measurement Model. In: Advances in Rehabilitation. Research Issues in Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine. Edited by Franchignoni F. Pavia, Italy, Maugeri Foundation 89–102, 2010
   Google Scholar
• Ndosi M, Tennant A, Bergsten U, Kukkurainen ML, Machado P, Torre-Aboki JD, Viet Vieland TP, et al: Cross-cultural validation of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool in RA in 7 European countries. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12: 110, 2011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar