Microbubble-mediated ultrasonic techniques for improved chemotherapeutic delivery in cancer

References

• American Cancer Society. (2010). Cancer facts and figures. Atlanta, Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Anwer K, Kao G, Proctor B, Anscombe I, Florack V, Earls R, Wilson E, McCreery T, Unger E, Rolland A, Sullivan SM. (2000). Ultrasound enhancement of cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer to primary tumors following systemic administration. Gene Ther, 7, 1833–1839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argiris A, Karamouzis MV, Raben D, Ferris RL. (2008). Head and neck cancer. Lancet, 371, 1695–1709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo AH, Hou JC, Lan YH, Tian YT, Zhang JY. (2008). Over-expression of EGFR on breast cancer. Chin J Cancer Res, 20, 69–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracco Diagnostics. (2001). SonoVue package insert.
   Google Scholar
• Calliada F, Campani R, Bottinelli O, Bozzini A, Sommaruga MG. (1998). Ultrasound contrast agents: Basic principles. Eur J Radiol, 27, 157–160.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron IL, Short N, Sun L, Hardman WE. (2005). Endothelial cell pseudopods and angiogenesis of breast cancer tumors. Cancer Cell Int, 5, 17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, Karaca G, Troester MA, Tse CK, Edmiston S, Deming SL, Geradts J, Cheang MC, Nielsen TO, Moorman PG, Earp HS, Millikan RC. (2006). Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the carolina breast cancer study. JAMA, 295, 2492–2502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeleit P, Jain RK. (2000). Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature, 407, 249–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey G, Cashman JP, Morrissey D, Whelan MC, Larkin JO, Soden DM, Tangney M, O’Sullivan GC. (2010). Sonoporation mediated immunogene therapy of solid tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol, 36, 430–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalecki D. (2004). Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 6, 229–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta S, Coussios CC, Ammi AY, Mast TD, de Courten-Myers GM, Holland CK. (2008). Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis using Definity as a cavitation nucleation agent. Ultrasound Med Biol, 34, 1421–1433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong N, Frinking PJ, Bouakaz A, Ten Cate FJ. (2000). Detection procedures of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasonics, 38, 87–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkman J. (1975). Tumor angiogenesis: A possible control point in tumor growth. Ann Intern Med, 82, 96–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkman J. (1985). Tumor angiogenesis. Adv Cancer Res, 43, 175–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes MM, Steinberg RL, O’Brien WD Jr. (2011). Frequency-dependent evaluation of the role of definity in producing sonoporation of Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Ultrasound Med, 30, 61–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes MM, Steinberg RL, O’Brien WD Jr. (2008). Examination of inertial cavitation of Optison in producing sonoporation of chinese hamster ovary cells. Ultrasound Med Biol, 34, 2009–2018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler RD, Burford WB, Hamiton Jr. JM, Sweet R, Weber C, Kasper J, Litant I. (1947). Synthesis of fluorocarbons. Ind Eng Chem Res, 39, 292–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haran EF, Maretzek AF, Goldberg I, Horowitz A, Degani H. (1994). Tamoxifen enhances cell death in implanted MCF7 breast cancer by inhibiting endothelium growth. Cancer Res, 54, 5511–5514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinkhani H, Aoyama T, Ogawa O, Tabata Y. (2003). Ultrasound enhances the transfection of plasmid DNA by non-viral vectors. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 4, 109–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huber PE, Pfisterer P. (2000). In vitro and in vivo transfection of plasmid DNA in the Dunning prostate tumor R3327-AT1 is enhanced by focused ultrasound. Gene Ther, 7, 1516–1525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang JH, Brayman AA, Reidy MA, Matula TJ, Kimmey MB, Crum LA. (2005). Vascular effects induced by combined 1-MHz ultrasound and microbubble contrast agent treatments in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol, 31, 553–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwanaga K, Tominaga K, Yamamoto K, Habu M, Maeda H, Akifusa S, Tsujisawa T, Okinaga T, Fukuda J, Nishihara T. (2007). Local delivery system of cytotoxic agents to tumors by focused sonoporation. Cancer Gene Ther, 14, 354–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain RK. (2001). Delivery of molecular and cellular medicine to solid tumors. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 46, 149–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamaev PP, Hutcheson JD, Wilson ML, Prausnitz MR. (2004). Quantification of optison bubble size and lifetime during sonication dominant role of secondary cavitation bubbles causing acoustic bioeffects. J Acoust Soc Am, 115, 1818–1825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karshafian R, Bevan PD, Williams R, Samac S, Burns PN. (2009). Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: Effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability. Ultrasound Med Biol, 35, 847–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsan A, Yee E, Harlan JM. (1996). Endothelial cell death induced by tumor necrosis factor-α is inhibited by the Bcl-2 family member, A1. J Biol Chem, 271, 27201–27204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama T, Aoi A, Watanabe Y, Horie S, Kodama M, Li L, Chen R, Teramoto N, Morikawa H, Mori S, Fukumoto M. (2010). Evaluation of transfection efficiency in skeletal muscle using nano/microbubbles and ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol, 36, 1196–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs C, Odwin CS, Fleischer AC. (2004). Appleton and lange review for the ultrasonography examination. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lantheus Medical Imaging. (2008). Definity Packagage Insert.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil PL, Steinhardt RA. (2003). Plasma membrane disruption: Repair, prevention, adaptation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 19, 697–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Averkiou MA, Brayman AA, Everbach EC, Holland CK, Wible JH Jr, Wu J. (2008). Bioeffects considerations for diagnostic ultrasound contrast agents. J Ultrasound Med, 27, 611–32; quiz 633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Bao S, Gies RA, Thrall BD. (1999). Ultrasonic enhancement of gene transfection in murine melanoma tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol, 25, 1425–1430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Pislaru SV, Greenleaf JE. (2002). Sonoporation: Mechanical DNA delivery by ultrasonic cavitation. Somat Cell Mol Genet, 27, 115–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller DL, Quddus J. (2000). Sonoporation of monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast-agent gas bodies. Ultrasound Med Biol, 26, 661–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee D, Wong J, Griffin B, Ellis SG, Porter T, Sen S, Thomas JD. (2000). Ten-fold augmentation of endothelial uptake of vascular endothelial growth factor with ultrasound after systemic administration. J Am Coll Cardiol, 35, 1678–1686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD, Almond J, Link K, Beger H, Bassi C, Falconi M, Pederzoli P, Dervenis C, Fernandez-Cruz L, Lacaine F, Pap A, Spooner D, Kerr DJ, Friess H, Büchler MW. European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. (2001). Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 358, 1576–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orive G, Hernández RM, Rodríguez Gascón A, Domínguez-Gil A, Pedraz JL. (2003). Drug delivery in biotechnology: Present and future. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 14, 659–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan H, Zhou Y, Izadnegahdar O, Cui J, Deng CX. (2005). Study of sonoporation dynamics affected by ultrasound duty cycle. Ultrasound Med Biol, 31, 849–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim A, Taylor SL, Bush NL, ter Haar GR, Bamber JC, Porter CD. (2006). Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol, 32, 1269–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RxMed. (1999). Levovist package insert.
   Google Scholar
• Schlicher RK, Radhakrishna H, Tolentino TP, Apkarian RP, Zarnitsyn V, Prausnitz MR. (2006). Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol, 32, 915–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider M. (1999). SonoVue, a new ultrasound contrast agent. Eur Radiol, 9 Suppl 3, S347–S348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang X, Wang P, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Xue Y. (2011). Mechanism of low-frequency ultrasound in opening blood-tumor barrier by tight junction. J Mol Neurosci, 43, 364–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi WT, Forsberg F, Vaidyanathan P, Tornes A, Østensen J, Goldberg BB. (2006). The influence of acoustic transmit parameters on the destruction of contrast microbubbles in vitro. Phys Med Biol, 51, 4031–4045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian IV, Devineni S, Ghebre R, Ghosh G, Joshi HP, Jing Y, Truskinovsky AM, Ramakrishnan S. (2011). AAV-P125A-endostatin and paclitaxel treatment increases endoreduplication in endothelial cells and inhibits metastasis of breast cancer. Gene Ther, 18, 145–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassernan AA, Kazavchinskii YZ, Rabinovich VA. (1966). Thermophysical properties of air and air components. Moscow, Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• van Wamel A, Kooiman K, Harteveld M, Emmer M, ten Cate FJ, Versluis M, de Jong N. (2006). Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: Drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. J Control Release, 112, 149–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward M, Wu J, Chiu JF. (1999). Ultrasound-induced cell lysis and sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents. J Acoust Soc Am, 105, 2951–2957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Pepe J, Rincón M. (2006). Sonoporation, anti-cancer drug and antibody delivery using ultrasound. Ultrasonics, 44 Suppl 1, e21–e25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yeh CK, Su SY. (2008). Effects of acoustic insonation parameters on ultrasound contrast agent destruction. Ultrasound Med Biol, 34, 1281–1291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zderic V, Vaezy S, Martin RW, Clark JI. (2002). Ocular drug delivery using 20-kHz ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol, 28, 823–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YZ, Gao HS, Zhou ZC, Tang QQ, Lu CT, Jin Z, Tian JL, Xu YY, Tian XQ, Wang L, Kong FL, Li XK, Huang PT, He HL, Wu Y. (2010). Experiment on the factors for enhancing the susceptibility of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drug by ultrasound microbubbles. J Drug Target, 18, 430–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar