A Prospective Randomized Study of Automated versus Mercury Blood Pressure Recordings in Hypertensive Pregnancy (PRAM Study)

REFERENCES

• Brown MA. Pre-eclampsia: A lifelong disorder? Med J Aust 2003; 179:182–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International Society of Hypertension management Guidelines. J Hypertens 1999; 17:151–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien E. Automated blood pressure measurement. State of the market in 1998 and the need for an international validation protocol for blood pressure measuring devices. Blood Press Monit 1998; 3:205–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• High blood pressure research Council of Australia. Position Statement on the replacement of mercury sphygmomanometers. September 2006, available online at: www.hbprca.com.au (accessed December 14, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Pickering T, Hall J, Appel L, Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Blood pressure measurement in humans: A statement for the professionals from the subcommittee of professional and public education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation 2005; 111:697–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, McHugh L, Mangos G, Davis G. Automated self initiated blood pressure or 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring in pregnancy? BJOG 2004; 111:38–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, The British Hypertension Society Protocol for the elevation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. J Hypertens 1990; 8:607–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American National Standard for Manual, Electronic, or Automated Sphygmomanometers. ANSIA/AAMI SP10; 2002. Arlington, Virginia: AAMI, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta M, Shennan A, Halligan A, Taylor D, de Swiet M. Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104;350–355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• British Hypertension Society. Blood pressure devices for use in special cases, available online at: www.bhsoc.org/bp_monitors/special.stm (accessed December 14, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Buddle ML, Bennett M, Smith B, Morris R, Whitworth JA. Ambulatory blood pressure in pregnancy: Comparison of the spacelabs 90207 and Accutracker II monitors with intra-arterial readings. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 173:218–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Robinson A, Buddle ML. Accuracy of automated blood pressure recorders in pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 38:262–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanssen L, Hedner T, Dahlof B. Prospective randomised open blinded and-point (PROBE) study. A novel design for intervention trials. Blood Pressure 1992; 1:113–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown MA, Buddle ML, Farrell TJ, Davis G, Jones M. Randomised trial of management of hypertensive pregnancies by Korotkoff phase IV or phase V. Lancet 1998; 352:777–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, Van Assche A, Moutquin JM. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertension Pregnancy 2001; 20:ix–xiv.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RS, Freeman L, North RA. Evaluation of ambulatory and self-initiated blood pressure monitors by pregnant and postpartum women. Hypertension Pregnancy 2001; 20:25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Buddle ML. Hypertension in Pregnancy: Maternal and fetal outcomes according to laboratory and clinical features. Med J Aust 1996; 165:360–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien. Replacing the mercury sphygmomanometer. BMJ 2000; 320:815–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Reiter L, Smith B, Buddle ML, Morris R, Whitworth JA. Measuring blood pressure in pregnant women: A comparison of direct and indirect methods. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 171:661–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders A, Cuckson AC, Lee TJ, Shennan AH. An accurate automated blood pressure device for use in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: The Microlife 3BTO-A. BJOG 2005; 112:915–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders A, Cuckson AC, Jones CR, Poet R, O’Sullivan G, Shennan AH. Validation of the Welch Allyn “Vital signs” blood pressure measurement device in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. BJOG 2003; 110:134–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo C, Taylor RS, Gamble G, McCowan L, North RA. Use of automated home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy: Is it safe? Am J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 187:1321–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golara M, Benedict A, Jones C, Randhawa M, Poston L, Shennan AH. Inflationary oscillometry provides accurate measurement of blood pressure in pre-eclampsia. BJOG 2002; 109:1143–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomini F, Scavo M, Ferrazzani S, De Carolis S, Caruso A, Mancuso S. There is poor agreement between manual auscultatory and automated oscillometric methods for the measurement of blood pressure in normotensive pregnant women. J Maternal Fetal Med 2001. 10:398–403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Natarajan P, Shennan AH, Penny J, Halligan AW, de Swiet M, Anthony J. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric automated blood pressure monitors in the setting of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181:1203–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar