Development of maternal and neonatal composite outcomes for trials evaluating management of late-onset pre-eclampsia

References

• Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries. Saving Mothers Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safe: 2006–2008. The Eighth Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2011;118:1–203
   Google Scholar
• Von Dadelszen P, Payne B, Li J, et al; PIERS Study Group. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model. Lancet 2011;377:219–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans C, Bijlenga D, Groen H, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 week’ gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:979–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backes C, Markham K, Moorehead P, et al. Maternal pre-eclampsia and neonatal outcomes. J Pregnancy 2011 ; Article ID 214365, 7 pages. doi:10.1155/2011/214365
   Google Scholar
• Khashu M, Narayanan M, Bhargava S, Osiovich H. Perinatal outcomes associated with preterm birth at 33 to 36 weeks’ gestation: a population-based cohort study. Pediatrics 2009;123:109–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju T, Higgins RD, Stark AR, Leveno KJ. Optimizing care and outcome for late-preterm (near-term) infants: a summary of the workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Pediatrics 2006;118:1207–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre D, Leveno KJ. Neonatal mortality and morbidity rates in late preterm births compared with births at term. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:35–41
   Google Scholar
• Huddy C, Johnson A, Hope PL. Educational and behavioural problems in babies of 32-35 weeks gestation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;85:F23–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron I, Erickson K, Ahronovich MD, et al. Visuospatial and verbal fluency relative deficits in ‘complicated' late-preterm preschool children. Early Hum Dev 2009;85:751–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caravale B, Tozzi C, Albino G, Vicari S. Cognitive development in low risk preterm infants at 3–4 years of life. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90:F474–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suppo de Souza Rugolo L, Bentlin MR, Trindaade CEP. Pre-eclampsia: effet on the fetus and newborn. Neoreviews 2011;12:e198–206
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Hypertension in pregnancy. CG107. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Sibai B. Diagnosis, management and prevention of eclampsia. ACOG 2005;105:402--10
   Google Scholar
• Montori V, Permanyer-Miralda G, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, et al. Validity of composite end points in clinical trials. BMJ 2005;330:594–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangaratinam S, Coomarasamy A, O'Mahony F, et al. Estimation of proteinuria as a predictor of complications of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. BMC Med 2009;7:10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangaratinam S, Gallos ID, Meah N, et al; TIPPS (Tests in Prediction of Pre-eclampsia's Severity) Review Group. How accurate are maternal symptoms in predicting impending complications in women with preeclampsia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:564–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangaratinam S, Ismail KM, Sharp S, et al; TIPPS (Tests in Prediction of Pre-eclampsia Severity) review group. Prioritisation of tests for the prediction of preeclampsia complications: a Delphi survey. Hypertens Pregnancy 2007;26:131–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha I, Smyth RL, Williamson PR. Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLoS Med 2011;8:e1000393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordoba G, Schwartz L, Woloshin S, et al. Definition, reporting and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ 2010;341:c3920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freemantle N, Calvert M, Wood J, et al. Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty? JAMA 2003;289:2554–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna H. The Delphi technique: a worthwhile approach to nursing? J Adv Nurs 1994;19:1221–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langeveld J, Broekhuijsen K, van Baaren G, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia between 34 and 37 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT-II): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011;11:50
   Google Scholar
• de Wit M, Abma T, Koelewijn-van Loon M, et al. Involving patient research partners has a significant impact on outcome research: a evaluation of the international OMERACT conferences. BMJ 2013;3:e002241. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudding T, Heron J, Thakkinstian A, et al. Factor V leiden is associated with pre-eclampsia but not with fetal growth restriction: a genetic association study and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2008;6:1869–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar