Measuring blood pressure in pregnancy and postpartum: assessing the reliability of automated measuring devices

References

• NSW Ministry of Health: Maternity – management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. NSW Ministry of Health Policy Directives; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Roberts CL, Algert CS, Morris JM, et al. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a population-based study. Med J Aust 2005;182:332–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence. New South Wales Mothers and Babies 2010. Sydney: NSW Ministry of Health; 2012
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Antenatal care: NICE clinical guideline 62. 2008. London, United Kingdom
   Google Scholar
• Lowe SA, Brown MA, Dekker G, et al. Guidelines for the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 2008. SOMANZ: Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, et al. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregn 2001;20:IX–XIV
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johenning AR, Karrison TG, Barron WM. Interobserver variability in the measurement of diastolic blood pressure in pregnancy. Hypertens Pregn 1995;14:301–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders LW, Mos CN, Thornton C, et al. Time poor: rushing decreases the accuracy and reliability of blood pressure measurement technique in pregnancy. Hypertens Pregn 2006;25:81–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shennan A, Gupta M, Halligan A, et al. Lack of reproducibility in pregnancy of Korotkoff phase IV as measured by mercury sphygmomanometry. Lancet 1996;347:139–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shennan AH, De Greeff A. Measuring blood pressure in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. In: Lyall F, Belfort M, eds. Pre-eclampsia: etiology and clinical practice. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2007:258–75
   Google Scholar
• Beevers G, Lip GY, O'Brien E. ABC of hypertension. Blood pressure measurement. Part II-conventional sphygmomanometry: technique of auscultatory blood pressure measurement. Br Med J 2001;322:1043–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Exposure to mercury: a major public health concern. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2007. Available from: http://www.who.int/phe/news/Mercury-flyer.pdf [last accessed 1 Apr 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Waugh JJ, Gupta M, Rushbrook J, et al. Hidden errors of aneroid sphygmomanometers. Blood Press Monit 2002;7:309–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Affordable technology: blood pressure measuring devices for low resource settings. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2005. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2005/9241592648.pdf [last accessed 10 Mar 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Nelson MR, Quinn S, Bowers-Ingram L, et al. Cluster-randomized controlled trial of oscillometric vs. manual sphygmomanometer for blood pressure management in primary care (CRAB). Am J Hypertens 2009;22:598–603
   Google Scholar
• Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial. Br Med J 2011;342:d286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn M. Automated blood pressure measurement devices: a potential source of morbidity in preeclampsia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1303–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders A, Cuckson AC, Lee JT, Shennan AH. An accurate automated blood pressure device for use in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: the Microlife 3BTO-A. BJOG 2005;112:915–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Greeff A, Beg Z, Gangji Z, et al. Accuracy of inflationary versus deflationary oscillometry in pregnancy and preeclampsia: OMRON-MIT versus OMRON-M7. Blood Press Monit 2009;14:37–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reinders A, Cuckson AC, Jones CR, et al. Validation of the Welch Allyn ‘Vital Signs' blood pressure measurement device in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. BJOG 2003;110:134–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Roberts L, Davis G, Mangos G. Can we use the Omron T9P automated blood pressure monitor in pregnancy? Hypertens Pregn 2011;30:188–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien E, Atkins N, Stergiou G, et al. European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 2010;15:23–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American National Standard for Non-invasive sphygmomanometers -- Part 2: clinical validation of automated measurement type. Arlington: AAMI; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Roberts LM, Mackenzie C, et al. A prospective randomized study of automated versus mercury blood pressure recordings in hypertensive pregnancy (PRAM Study). Hypertens Pregn 2012;31:107–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JJ, Rabinowitz D, Shea S. Sources of variability in blood pressure measurement using the Dinamap PRO 100 automated oscillometric device. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:1218–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Omron Healthcare. Automatic blood pressure monitor: model HEM-7200 Instruction Manual. Kyoto, Japan
   Google Scholar
• Topouchian J, Agnoletti D, Blacher J, et al. Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2011;7:709–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension 2005;45:142–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, et al. Measurement of blood pressure in the office: recognizing the problem and proposing the solution. Hypertension 2010;55:195–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar